The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Havana Docks, a U.S. company, whose dock operations in the Cuban capital were confiscated by Fidel Castro's regime in 1945.
FILE – An American flag waves in front of the Supreme Court building on Capitol Hill in Washington, on Nov. 2, 2020. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in favor of owners of Cuban property that was confiscated by Fidel Castro ’s government more than 65 years ago.
By an 8-1 vote, the justices revived claims filed by a U.S. company, Havana Docks, that operated docks in the Cuban capital. The suit targets four cruise lines that brought tourists to Cuba during the brief thaw in relations during the Obama administration. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court that the federal appeals court in Atlanta was wrong to dismiss the claims, holding that “the cruise lines used confiscated property to which Havana Docks owns the claim.
” The court’s ruling is not a final decision in the suit filed by Havana Docks. But it comes amid heightened pressure on Cuba from President Donald Trump’s administration, including Wednesday’s indictment ofThe Supreme Court case turned on a provision of the federal law known as Helms-Burton that Congress passed in response to the shootdowns. Title III of the law allows Americans to sue almost any company that engages in commercial activity or benefits from property confiscated by Cuba’s government.
Before the first Trump administration, every president had suspended the provision because of objections from U.S. allies doing business in Cuba and the effect on future negotiated settlements between the U.S. and Cuba. In 2016, President Barack Obama used a joint news conference with Castro to announce that cruise lines could resume service to Cuba.
Carnival, Norwegian, Royal Caribbean and MSC Cruises began making stops in Havana that allowed cruise travelers to go on excursions to local nightclubs, landmarks, rivers and beaches. Ruling in the lawsuit filed by Havana Docks, U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in Miami found the cruise lines liable for their use of the Havana terminal the company once controlled. Licenses by Obama’s Treasury Department to carry American passengers to Cuba did not shield the cruise lines from the lawsuit, Bloom ruled.
She awarded Havana Docks, more than $400 million in all. A federal appeals court ruled for the cruise lines, reversing the judgment. The case now returns to the appeals court. Thomas acknowledged that the cruise lines have additional arguments that have yet to be ruled on.
Supreme Court Havana Docks Helms-Burton Act Naval Blockade Act Trump Administration Castro Havana Cruise Lines Property Confiscation Joint News Conference
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Justice Jackson's Supreme Court warning amid approval crisisSupreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson issued a new warning about 'public confidence' in the court.
Read more »
The Supreme Court Weighs How Much Google Surveillance Can Be Used Against You in CourtThose questions do not have clean answers. But the instinct underlying the Fourth Amendment remains surprisingly stable across centuries.
Read more »
Supreme Court sides with US company in claims over property seized in Cuban revolutionThe Supreme Court has ruled in favor of owners of Cuban property that was confiscated by Fidel Castro’s government more than 65 years ago.
Read more »
Supreme Court sides with US company in claims over property seized in Cuban revolutionThe Supreme Court has ruled in favor of owners of Cuban property that was confiscated by Fidel Castro’s government more than 65 years ago.
Read more »