The next version of the DSM is being planned with some potentially major changes. Will we get a giant leap forward or just baby steps?
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual is an official list and definition of psychiatric disorders.Questions remain about whether the DSM can better reflect current science and remain practical for clinicians.
, otherwise known as the DSM. This book is often described erroneously as psychiatry’s “bible,” although “dictionary” would be a much more accurate comparison. The DSM provides the official list of psychiatric conditions and the specific criteria that must be met for someone to qualify for each diagnosis. We are now in the 5th edition of the DSM, which came out in 2013 and was gently revised a few years ago. What the DSM says has real consequences. Medical students, psychiatric trainees, and students of other mental health professionals are taught and tested on these disorders. Insurance companies also use it, and another system known as TheAt the same time, the DSM has many limitations and has been a punching bag for the many critics of psychiatry who make fun of the ever-expanding number of diagnoses, the reliance on subjective history rather than more concrete evidence like lab tests or brain scans in making diagnoses, and some of its past mistakes that in today’s world look rather foolish—like when being gay was considered a mental illness. Even daily consumers of the DSM harbor a lot of skepticism about it. As a psychiatrist in training, I was expected to learn it but also to take its content with the proverbial “grain of salt.” The more experience we gain, the more we understand how frequently the people who come to us for assessment and treatment don’t fit into these tidy boxes that the DSM creates. The diagnostic definitions are created by committees of experts. These experts rely on research and field trials as much as possible, but no one denies the degree to whichHaving the DSM be more of a “living document” that exists primarily online and can be more easily modified.Allowing for less-precise diagnoses in situations in which a more specific diagnosis is difficult . Having diagnoses be more context-dependent with regard to life experience, socioeconomic status, and a person’s individual view of their challenges. Giving greater weight to an individual’s quality of life and level of functioning when determining whether they meet criteria for a specific disorder. In some ways, some of this feels like the classic “going backward to go forward” scenario. Earlier editions of the DSM did provide more definition with regard to assessment of functioning andIt will be interesting to see how far the new DSM takes its hope to include more objective information, like lab tests, genetic markers, or neuroimaging data, into its framework. While the idea makes perfect sense theoretically and many of us have longed for this, we need to be careful about rolling this out prematurely. There are already products on the market that claim to help guide. There’s also a well-known clinic chain that claims to be able to make more accurate diagnoses and treatment recommendations based on getting a specific brain scan. The evidence for some of these claims are pretty sketchy and often overhyped. I’m confident we’ll get there someday, but whether this is ready for primetime now is debatable. Relatedly, another thorny issue that keeps coming up has to do with the way that the DSM attempts to make diagnoses binary—like, you either have it or you don’t—when ever accumulating evidence shows that this is just not how most things work. With perhaps a few exceptions, most conditions, from ADHD tobetween disorder and non-disorder. I often tell my patients that diagnosing someone with ADHD is like declaring that someone is “tall.” This dimensionality is likely one of the reasons it has been so difficult to find clear lab tests or brain scan benchmarks for psychiatric illness.Previous DSM editions got into big arguments about this issue, with many experts acknowledging the dimensionality of our conditions but being concerned about how to deal with this practically. Personally, I don’t think it is that impossible—just look at some of the most common physical illness diagnoses, from hypertension to high cholesterol to diabetes, which are also highly dimensional in nature. Overall, there is wide agreement from both within and outside the psychiatric community that significant changes are needed in our diagnostic system and approach. I look forward to some substantive improvements with the next edition but won’t be holding my breath that DSM-6 will either fix all these problems or quiet its many critics.Oquendo MA, Abi-Dargham A, et al. Initial strategy for the future of DSM. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2026. AJP in advance.Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
5 Thoughts From Purdue's 72-67 Loss to IndianaNo. 12 Purdue lost its third straight game on Tuesday, falling 72-67. Here are a few thoughts, as the Boilermakers continue to slide in the Big Ten standings.
Read more »
Dot Richardson Shares Early Thoughts on Liberty Softball’s Upcoming SeasonUSA Softball icon and Lady Flames head coach shares insight and expectations on current team heading into 2026 season.
Read more »
Character advances when you control your thoughts and choices.Self‑governance, strength of character, and self-empowerment are not promises of ease or rapid transformation. This insight involves choices.
Read more »
Trump Slammed For 'Shameful' Response After Ilhan Omar Was Attacked — And Experts Have ThoughtsKimberley Richards is a senior reporter at HuffPost, where she covers a wide range of trending news topics, including politics, lifestyle and issues on race and discrimination.
Read more »
Tom Brady shares his thoughts on Pro Football Hall of Fame snubA future Pro Football Hall of Famer shares his thoughts on the shocking snub of his former head coach.
Read more »
Garrett Nussmeier cites Finebaum when sharing thoughts on LSU’s Lane KiffinThe former LSU quarterback is participating in the Senior Bowl this week.
Read more »