Harvey Weinstein's #MeToo retrial date and whether it will include an extra allegation are set to be decided by a judge. Weinstein, 72, wants the new charge thrown out, arguing it is an attempt to strengthen the prosecution’s case after his 2020 conviction was overturned. His lawyer has also requested the trial be prioritized due to Weinstein's declining health.
NEW YORK — Harvey Weinstein is due back in court Wednesday as a judge is set to decide when the disgraced movie mogul’s #MeToo retrial will start and whether it will include an allegation involving a woman who wasn’t in the original case.
Weinstein, 72, wants the extra charge thrown out, arguing through lawyers that Manhattan prosecutors only brought it to bolster their case with a third accuser after New York’s highest court overturned his 2020 conviction on rape and sexual assault charges involving two women. Judge Curtis Farber is expected to rule on that and other matters, including the trial date — a task that’s been complicated by an increasingly crowded court calendar. Weinstein’s lawyer, Arthur Aidala, is representing conservative strategist Steve Bannon in a border wall fraud trial that’s set to start March 4 before a different Manhattan judge. Meanwhile, Farber has a murder trial in March. Before Bannon’s trial date was set last week, Aidala had suggested that Weinstein’s trial go first in “the interest of humanity,” citing the ex-studio boss’ declining health. Weinstein is being treated for numerous medical conditions, including chronic myeloid leukemia and diabetes. “They know that Mr. Weinstein is dying of cancer and is an innocent man right now in the state of New York,” Aidala argued in court last week. He pleaded to prosecutors: “Can I try this dying man’s case first?” Weinstein is being retried on charges that he forcibly performed oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant in 2006 and raped an aspiring actor in 2013. The additional charge, filed last September, alleges he forced oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006. The Manhattan district attorney’s office said in court papers that the woman, who has not been identified publicly, came forward to prosecutors just days before the start of Weinstein’s first trial but was not part of that case. Prosecutors said they did not pursue the women’s allegations after Weinstein was convicted and sentenced to 23 years in prison, but they revisited them and secured a new indictment after the state’s Court of Appeals threw out his conviction last April.Weinstein’s lawyers contend that prosecutors prejudiced him by waiting nearly five years to bring the additional charge, suggesting they had elected not to include the allegation in his first trial so they could use it later if his conviction were reversed. Prosecutors called that thinking “absurd,” countering that Weinstein’s lawyers would have also been outraged if he had been charged based on the third woman’s allegation either during his first trial or immediately after his conviction. Weinstein “would likely have characterized that timing as a vindictive and gratuitous pile-on,” prosecutors wrote in a court filing last month. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office said the previously uncharged allegation “required a sensitive investigation” and serious contemplation before seeking an indictment, in part because there are no eyewitnesses to the alleged assault and no scientific or other physical evidence. Weinstein co-founded the film and television production companies Miramax and The Weinstein Company and was once one of the most powerful people in Hollywood, having produced films such as “Pulp Fiction” and “The Crying Game.” In 2017, he became the most prominent villain of the #MeToo movement, which erupted when women began going public with accounts of his behavior.In vacating Weinstein’s conviction, the Court of Appeals ruled that the trial judge, James M. Burke, unfairly allowed testimony against him based on allegations from other women that were not part of the case. Burke is no longer on the bench. Weinstein was convicted in Los Angeles in 2022 of another rape. His 16-year prison sentence in that case still stands, but his lawyers appealed in June, arguing he did not get a fair trial. Weinstein has remained in custody in New York’s Rikers Island jail complex, with occasional trips to a hospital for medical treatment, while awaiting the retrial.Former Democrat New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez Sentenced to 11 YearsTrump Thanks First Responders for ‘Incredible Work’ After Collision at Reagan AirportMarlow on Kudlow: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Is a ‘Subtle Genius’Former Democrat New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez Sentenced to 11 YearsCarney on Kudlow: Trump’s Tariffs Could ‘Almost Eliminate the Corporate Tax’ Dershowitz: Good to See Trump Admin. Acting on Antisemites ‘Abusing’ Visas, They Aren’t ‘Entitled’ to Be Here
HARVEY WEINSTEIN #METOO TRIAL RETRIAL NEW YORK COURT LAWYER HEALTH
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Harvey Weinstein to Return to Court for Retrial Amidst Health ConcernsDisgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein faces a retrial in New York after his 2020 rape conviction was overturned. A judge will decide on the retrial date and whether to include allegations from a woman not in the original case. Meanwhile, Weinstein's lawyer claims he is suffering from leukemia and other health issues.
Read more »
Harvey Weinstein Pleads for Earlier Trial Date Due to Health ConcernsHarvey Weinstein, facing charges of sexual assault, urged the court to move his trial date sooner citing his deteriorating health and the harsh conditions at Rikers Island. Weinstein, who is in a wheelchair and battling leukemia, claims the prison environment is a 'medieval situation' and he fears for his well-being.
Read more »
Harvey Weinstein to Face Retrial in New York on Rape ChargesDisgraced Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein will face a retrial in New York on rape charges starting April 15, a judge announced. Weinstein was previously convicted in 2020 but that conviction was overturned last year. The new trial will include a new allegation from a woman who was not part of the original case.
Read more »
Harvey Weinstein Seeks Earlier Retrial Date Citing Health Concerns and Rikers Island ConditionsHarvey Weinstein, the disgraced former film producer, requested an earlier start date for his upcoming rape retrial, citing deteriorating health and the harsh conditions at Rikers Island jail. Weinstein, who is wheelchair-bound and frail, argued that he wouldn't be able to withstand the current April 15 start date and appealed to the judge for a more lenient schedule. His lawyer stated that Weinstein's health was severely impacted by the constant back-and-forth between Rikers Island, court, and Bellevue Hospital.
Read more »
Harvey Weinstein Back in Court as Judge Weighs Scope of #MeToo Rape RetrialSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
Harvey Weinstein Urges Speedy Retrial, Citing Declining Health and Jail ConditionsDisgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein, while facing a retrial on sexual assault charges, appealed to a judge to expedite the proceedings, citing his deteriorating health and the harsh conditions at Rikers Island jail. He requested a date swap with another trial, expressing concern over his ability to endure the wait.
Read more »