23 DACA recipients from the Chicago area crossed the US-Mexico border with Advance Parole, allowing them to travel internationally and potentially pave the way for citizenship or residency. This comes as many DACA recipients seek to secure their status before Donald Trump's potential second term, during which he previously attempted to eliminate both DACA and the Advance Parole program.
ByWhat is DACA ? Trump sought to eliminate the program allowing some undocumented immigrants who were brought to the US illegally to live and work there.With the clock ticking down to a second Donald Trump presidency, 23 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipients, most of them from the Chicago area, crossed the land border between the United States and Mexico on Thursday with a paper in hand allowing them to come back.ABC7 Chicago is now streaming 24/7.
Over the years, tens of thousands of people have used it to erase their initial illegal entry into the country. "This was an invitation that we got from Tamaulipas, from the university from the professors there with this amazing curriculum so that fit the bill," Lozano said.
DACA Advance Parole Immigration Donald Trump Citizenship
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era policy that shielded immigrants who arrived in the US illegally as children. The decision, which marks the latest setback for DACA, prohibits the federal government from accepting new applications while current beneficiaries can renew their permits. While the ruling does not immediately change the status of DACA recipients, it raises concerns about the program's future and its vulnerability to further legal challenges.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against DACA, an Obama-era policy that protects immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, while not immediately changing the status of current beneficiaries, blocks new applications and raises concerns about the program's future. The ruling could lead to a third Supreme Court case on DACA.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAIn a significant setback for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a federal appeals court ruled against the Obama-era policy that shields young immigrants brought to the US illegally as children. While the ruling doesn't immediately impact the over 500,000 beneficiaries who can renew their permits, it blocks new applications, raising concerns about the program's future.
Read more »
Appeals court rules DACA, Obama-era immigration policy, is unlawfulTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the challenge on behalf of Republican-led states, called the ruling 'a major victory'
Read more »
Appeals Court Rejects Obama-Era DACA PolicyA federal appeals court ruled against an Obama-era policy that protected immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children, dealing a setback to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. While the decision doesn't immediately affect current beneficiaries, the inability to accept new applications raises concerns about the program's future.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Biden's DACA PolicyA federal appeals court struck down a Biden-era policy reviving the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, citing executive overreach. The ruling, which does not immediately change the status quo for existing DACA recipients, blocks new applications and raises the possibility of a third Supreme Court appeal.
Read more »