Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Biden's DACA Policy

Politics News

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Biden's DACA Policy
DACAImmigrationBiden
  • 📰 FoxNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 110 sec. here
  • 9 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 68%
  • Publisher: 87%

A federal appeals court struck down a Biden-era policy reviving the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, citing executive overreach. The ruling, which does not immediately change the status quo for existing DACA recipients, blocks new applications and raises the possibility of a third Supreme Court appeal.

A federal appeals court ruled against an Obama-era policy providing amnesty and a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants who entered the U.S. as children. A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans unanimously determined that a new version of the policy issued by President Biden in 2022 exceeded the executive branch's authority.

The decision, made by two Republican-appointed judges and one Democratic-appointed judge, is a setback for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which has faced numerous legal challenges over the past decade, leaving 500,000 so-called Dreamers in limbo. While the ruling does not immediately change the status quo, program beneficiaries can still renew their temporary permits to live and work in the United States without fear of deportation. However, the federal government remains barred from processing new DACA applications. This decision, however, opens the possibility for DACA to be appealed to the Supreme Court for the third time. It coincides with the impending presidency of Donald Trump, who campaigned on a platform of mass deportations of illegal immigrants, making the timing particularly significant.Trump attempted to terminate DACA during his first term but also made statements indicating his willingness to allow Dreamers to remain in the U.S. Obama established DACA in 2012, citing Congress's inaction on legislation that would provide a path to legal status for those brought to the U.S. as children. Legal battles ensued, including two Supreme Court hearings. Biden's 2022 update to the policy, while largely substantively unchanged, underwent public comment as part of a formal rule-making process aimed at strengthening its legal standing. Ken Paxton, the Texas Attorney General who spearheaded the legal challenge on behalf of Republican-led states, hailed the ruling as a 'major victory.' Paxton stated his intention to collaborate with President-elect Trump to 'ensure that the rule of law is restored, and the illegal immigration crisis is finally stopped.' The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a Fox News Digital request for comment. In 2016, with a Supreme Court vacancy, justices deadlocked 4-4 on an expanded DACA and a program version for parents of DACA recipients, upholding a lower court decision to block the benefits. In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA by failing to adhere to federal procedures, allowing the program to remain in effect

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

FoxNews /  🏆 9. in US

DACA Immigration Biden Trump Supreme Court Appeals Court

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Federal Appeals Court Rules DACA Unlawful, Raising Concerns for 'Dreamers'Federal Appeals Court Rules DACA Unlawful, Raising Concerns for 'Dreamers'A federal appeals court has declared the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy unlawful, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the future of hundreds of thousands of 'Dreamers' brought to the U.S. as children. The ruling, while partially stayed, could ultimately lead to the Supreme Court deciding the fate of this long-debated program. The Biden administration's efforts to codify DACA were deemed to violate U.S. immigration law, with the court focusing its impact on Texas, the state leading the legal challenge against DACA. The ruling's implications for current DACA beneficiaries remain unclear, pending further court decisions.
Read more »

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAFederal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era policy that shielded immigrants who arrived in the US illegally as children. The decision, which marks the latest setback for DACA, prohibits the federal government from accepting new applications while current beneficiaries can renew their permits. While the ruling does not immediately change the status of DACA recipients, it raises concerns about the program's future and its vulnerability to further legal challenges.
Read more »

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAFederal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against DACA, an Obama-era policy that protects immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, while not immediately changing the status of current beneficiaries, blocks new applications and raises concerns about the program's future. The ruling could lead to a third Supreme Court case on DACA.
Read more »

Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAFederal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAIn a significant setback for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a federal appeals court ruled against the Obama-era policy that shields young immigrants brought to the US illegally as children. While the ruling doesn't immediately impact the over 500,000 beneficiaries who can renew their permits, it blocks new applications, raising concerns about the program's future.
Read more »

Appellate Court Allows Joe Biden to Open Obamacare to DACA Illegal AliensAppellate Court Allows Joe Biden to Open Obamacare to DACA Illegal AliensSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »

Supreme Court Denies Big Oil's Attempt to Shift Climate Liability Cases to Federal CourtSupreme Court Denies Big Oil's Attempt to Shift Climate Liability Cases to Federal CourtThe Supreme Court has rejected Big Oil's effort to move climate liability cases to federal court, allowing state courts to continue deciding on lawsuits that could hold fossil fuel companies responsible for climate damages. This decision is a significant victory for climate activists and communities seeking accountability from the oil and gas industry. The ruling comes amidst a global climate crisis fueled by fossil fuel emissions and follows a string of recent legal setbacks for Big Oil.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-12 19:09:55