In a significant setback for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a federal appeals court ruled against the Obama-era policy that shields young immigrants brought to the US illegally as children. While the ruling doesn't immediately impact the over 500,000 beneficiaries who can renew their permits, it blocks new applications, raising concerns about the program's future.
A federal appeals court on Friday ruled against DACA , an Obama-era policy to shield immigrants who came to the country illegally as young children. The unanimous decision by a panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans - two judges appointed by Republican presidents, Ronald Reagan and George W.
Bush, and one by Democrat Barack Obama - is the latest blow for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, whose beneficiaries have lived in legal limbo for more than a decade. It signals no immediate change for its more than 500,000 beneficiaries, who can renew temporary permits to live and work in the United States. But the federal government cannot take new applications, leaving an aging and thinning pool of recipients. The decision may tee up the policy for a third visit to the Supreme Court. Trump sought to end DACA during his first term, but he also occasionally expressed wishes that beneficiaries be allowed to stay. Obama introduced DACA in 2012, citing inaction by Congress on legislation aimed at giving those brought to the U.S. as children a path to legal status. Legal battles followed, including two trips to the Supreme Court. This latest case involves a new version of the rule issued by President Joe Biden in 2022. It represented little substantive change from the 2012 memo that created DACA, but it was subject to public comment as part of a formal rule-making process intended to improve its chances of surviving legal muster. U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen in Houston said the executive branch had overstepped its authority and barred the government from approving new applications. He left it intact for current beneficiaries while appeals played out in court.Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the challenge on behalf of Republican-led states, called Friday's ruling 'a major victory.' 'I look forward to working with President-elect Donald Trump to ensure that the rule of law is restored, and the illegal immigration crisis is finally stopped,' Paxton said. The U.S. Homeland Security Department didn't immediately respond to a message seeking comment late Friday. In 2016, with one vacancy on the Supreme Court, the justices deadlocked 4-4 over an expanded DACA and a version of the program for parents of DACA recipients, keeping in place a lower court decision for the benefits to be blocked. In 2020, the high court ruled 5-4 that the Trump administration improperly ended DACA by failing to follow federal procedures, allowing it to stay in place
DACA Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals Immigration Supreme Court Federal Appeals Court Biden Administration
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Appeals Court Rules DACA Unlawful, Raising Concerns for 'Dreamers'A federal appeals court has declared the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) immigration policy unlawful, casting a shadow of uncertainty over the future of hundreds of thousands of 'Dreamers' brought to the U.S. as children. The ruling, while partially stayed, could ultimately lead to the Supreme Court deciding the fate of this long-debated program. The Biden administration's efforts to codify DACA were deemed to violate U.S. immigration law, with the court focusing its impact on Texas, the state leading the legal challenge against DACA. The ruling's implications for current DACA beneficiaries remain unclear, pending further court decisions.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era policy that shielded immigrants who arrived in the US illegally as children. The decision, which marks the latest setback for DACA, prohibits the federal government from accepting new applications while current beneficiaries can renew their permits. While the ruling does not immediately change the status of DACA recipients, it raises concerns about the program's future and its vulnerability to further legal challenges.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against DACA, an Obama-era policy that protects immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, while not immediately changing the status of current beneficiaries, blocks new applications and raises concerns about the program's future. The ruling could lead to a third Supreme Court case on DACA.
Read more »
Appeals Court Rejects Obama-Era DACA PolicyA federal appeals court ruled against an Obama-era policy that protected immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children, dealing a setback to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. While the decision doesn't immediately affect current beneficiaries, the inability to accept new applications raises concerns about the program's future.
Read more »
Appeals court rules DACA, Obama-era immigration policy, is unlawfulTexas Attorney General Ken Paxton, who led the challenge on behalf of Republican-led states, called the ruling 'a major victory'
Read more »
Federal Judge Sets Court Date After NASCAR Appeals 23XI Racing And FRM Lawsuit MilestoneA federal judge has set a court date for January 2025 to address NASCAR's motion to dismiss an antitrust lawsuit by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports.
Read more »