A federal appeals court has struck down a law prohibiting the sale of long guns to people under 21, citing the Second Amendment. The ruling, handed down by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, reverses previous decisions by the court and follows a trend in other states where similar laws have been challenged.
The Giffords Center called the ruling reckless and that it hoped the Supreme Court would uphold the law.The ruling, handed down by a panel of three judges on the conservative U.S. 5th U.S.
The Supreme Court, meanwhile, decided to keep a federal gun law on the books last year. The high court overturned a different ruling from the 5th Circuit and upheld a law intended to protect victims of domestic violence.Those challenging the ban included the Firearms Policy Coalition, the Second Amendment Foundation and the Louisiana Shooting Association.
Federal law requires a person to be 21 to purchase a handgun from a licensed firearm dealer and 18 to buy a long gun from a dealer, according to Everytown for Gun Safety. There is an 18-year-old minimum for handgun purchases from unlicensed sellers and no minimum age for long guns, according to the group’s research.
The Giffords Law Center called the decision reckless and said age restrictions help prevent violence. “We hope the current law will be ultimately upheld,” legal director David Pucino said.
Second Amendment Gun Control Age Restrictions Firearms Appeals Court
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Appeals Court Rules Against DACA, Setting Up Potential Supreme Court ShowdownA federal appeals court dealt a blow to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, ruling against an Obama-era policy that shielded young immigrants who arrived in the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, which bars the federal government from accepting new DACA applications, could lead to another Supreme Court battle over the program's future.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, an Obama-era policy that shielded immigrants who arrived in the US illegally as children. The decision, which marks the latest setback for DACA, prohibits the federal government from accepting new applications while current beneficiaries can renew their permits. While the ruling does not immediately change the status of DACA recipients, it raises concerns about the program's future and its vulnerability to further legal challenges.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAA federal appeals court has ruled against DACA, an Obama-era policy that protects immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children. The decision, while not immediately changing the status of current beneficiaries, blocks new applications and raises concerns about the program's future. The ruling could lead to a third Supreme Court case on DACA.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against DACAIn a significant setback for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, a federal appeals court ruled against the Obama-era policy that shields young immigrants brought to the US illegally as children. While the ruling doesn't immediately impact the over 500,000 beneficiaries who can renew their permits, it blocks new applications, raising concerns about the program's future.
Read more »
Federal Appeals Court Rules Against Biden's DACA PolicyA federal appeals court struck down a Biden-era policy reviving the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, citing executive overreach. The ruling, which does not immediately change the status quo for existing DACA recipients, blocks new applications and raises the possibility of a third Supreme Court appeal.
Read more »
Appeals Court Rules Against Obama-Era DACA ProgramA federal appeals court has dealt a blow to the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, blocking the government from accepting new applications. The ruling, while not immediately impacting the over 500,000 current beneficiaries who can renew their permits, raises concerns about the future of the program established by President Obama to protect immigrants brought to the U.S. illegally as children.
Read more »