OPINION: A better way to balance Alaska’s budget

Pfd News

OPINION: A better way to balance Alaska’s budget
TaxStateIncome

It is possible to preserve a “statutory” PFD and increase education funding without draining the Permanent Fund.

The Alaska State Senate chamber, photographed on Monday, Jan. 16, 2023 at the Alaska State Capitol in Juneau. We’re all familiar with the slogan, “You can’t cut your way to prosperity.” Its less disputable corollary is rarely heard: You can cut your way to continued decline.

This thought comes from Michele Anderson, who in her recent book, “Re-Imagining Discarded America,” wrote about poor places struggling to reverse their long downward spiral. Alaska isn’t poor like the towns Anderson chronicled — at least not yet. But we seem to be. heading that way as fast as we can. Alaska’s public disinvestment over the past seven years is astonishing. We’ve cut public services right and left, even as we blew through billions of dollars of savings. But like Anderson’s places, the cuts didn’t create more efficiencies; they just cut services. Alaska has cut public health, ferries, road maintenance, troopers, university, schools : everything — except prisons. The state nowLeaders in Anderson’s book eventually realized that to climb out of their poverty trap, they had to start investing in people. That is much harder to do with a depleted tax base. Many writers on these pages have also called for a long-delayed jump in spending on K-12 public schools, too. Most who considered how to pay for the increase, like Rep. Zack Fields,After 40 years, the dividend is deeply embedded in the economy. Many Alaskans rely on it to make ends meet. Do you think employers will give workers a 10% pay increase to offset a $1,000 cut in the dividend? Let’s be honest. A cut in the PFD is a tax — the most regressive tax ever proposed. A $1,000 cut will pushbelow the poverty line. It will increase homelessness and food insecurity. A low-income family loses $1,000 per person, while a high-income family loses about $700 per person, because their federal income taxes drop. Progressives like Fields who advocate for using PFD cuts to pay for public spending should think again. It is possible to preserve a “statutory” PFD and increase education funding without draining the Permanent Fund. What if our legislators and governor mustered the courage to ask us to pay taxes, and we distributed the statutory PFD as a refundable tax credit? The feds already do something like this with the child tax credit.Here’s how it would work: We start paying a state income tax, perhaps a flat percentage — say 15%, for example — of our federal income tax liability. The PFD would be paid as a credit against the state taxes owed. If the PFD exceeded our individual tax liability, the state would issue us a check for the difference. Alaskans earning too little to pay income taxes get the whole PFD. Nonresidents would pay the state a lot more, because they would not get the tax credit. Higher-income Alaskans would come out ahead, too. A PFD tax credit isn’t taxable income, so the feds couldn’t tax it. One complication — actually a benefit for Alaskans — is that the PFD Division would have to calculate and pay out the dividend much earlier in the year, along with income tax refunds. Don’t like this idea? OK, what is your plan? How does it compare to this proposal? How fair is it? How much do nonresidents pay relative to residents? Yes, there would be details to work out, but that’s true of any plan. It’s time for our elected officials to lead and ask us to pay taxes. Putting off the tough decisions just digs us deeper into our hole of decline.is Professor of Economics at the UAA Institute of Social and Economic Research . The views expressed are his own, and do not represent the views of ISER or the University of Alaska Anchorage. The views expressed here are the writer’s and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a broad range of viewpoints. To submit a piece for consideration, email

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

adndotcom /  🏆 293. in US

Tax State Income Way Alaska People Dividend Credit Anderson Cut Person Family Plan Iser Book Decline Alaskans Alaskans Adncom University Spending Spiral Slogan Corollary

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Did Biden's Border Executive Order Increase His Reelection Chances?Did Biden's Border Executive Order Increase His Reelection Chances?See multiple perspectives from National Review (Opinion), New York Times (Opinion), and Reuters at AllSides.com.
Read more »

How Can World Leaders Honor, Uphold the Ideals Fought for in WWII?How Can World Leaders Honor, Uphold the Ideals Fought for in WWII?See multiple perspectives from New York Times (Opinion), CNN (Opinion), and BBC News at AllSides.com.
Read more »

What Do the EU Election Results Mean for Europe and the United States?See multiple perspectives from CNN (Opinion), Reuters, and Wall Street Journal (Opinion) at AllSides.com.
Read more »

What Does Moore v. United States Mean for a Future Wealth Tax?What Does Moore v. United States Mean for a Future Wealth Tax?See multiple perspectives from National Review (Opinion), National Review (Opinion), and Vox at AllSides.com.
Read more »

Should Democrats Replace Joe Biden with Kamala Harris?Should Democrats Replace Joe Biden with Kamala Harris?See multiple perspectives from New York Times (Opinion) and Wall Street Journal (Opinion) at AllSides.com.
Read more »

Should Democrats Replace Joe Biden with Kamala Harris?Should Democrats Replace Joe Biden with Kamala Harris?See multiple perspectives from New York Times (Opinion) and Wall Street Journal (Opinion) at AllSides.com.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-05-19 16:53:50