Judge warns Trump administration from changing plaintiffs immigration status in First Amendment case

Constitutional Law News

Judge warns Trump administration from changing plaintiffs immigration status in First Amendment case
TrialsLawsuitsCourts
  • 📰 ABC
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 231 sec. here
  • 19 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 145%
  • Publisher: 51%

A federal judge ruled that the academics, who are party to a lawsuit alleging U.S. policy singles out noncitizens for detention or deportation over their pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, can seek relief from the court if their immigration ...

A federal judge ruled that the academics, who are party to a lawsuit alleging U.S. policy singles out noncitizens for detention or deportation over their pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, can seek relief from the court if their immigration .

..United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio walks down stairs after a meeting during the Annual Meeting of the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Wednesday, Jan. 21, 2026. alleging U.S. policy singles out noncitizens for detention or deportation over their pro-Palestinian activism on college campuses, can seek relief from the court if their immigration status is changed as retribution for taking part in the case. The ruling from U.S. District Judge William Young comes in the wake of trial last year, in which he ruled the Trump administration violated the Constitution when it targeted non-U.S. citizens for deportation solely for supporting Palestinians and. Young repeatedly chastised the administration for violating the First Amendment rights of the plaintiffs and, on Thursday, issued what he described as “remedial sanction to protect certain of the Plaintiffs’ noncitizen members from any retribution for the free exercise of their constitutional rights.” During the hearing in the case earlier this month, Young maintained that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and their agents had engaged in an “unconstitutional conspiracy” to limit the free speech of the plaintiffs, creating a chilling effect on their rights by their attempts to “pick off certain people.” “The big problem in this case is that the cabinet secretaries, ostensibly and president of the United States, are not honoring the First Amendment,” said Young, an appointee of the late Republican President Ronald Reagan. “There doesn’t seem to be an understanding of what the First Amendment is by this government.” In his ruling, Young said that a noncitizen challenging his or her immigration status change would have to prove that they were a member of the American Association of University Professors and Middle East Studies Association, the two groups that sued, between March 25, 2025, and Sept. 30, 2025. They would also have to show their immigration status had not expired and had not committed any crime after Sept. 30, 2025. The Associated Press is not aware of any members of these groups whose status has changed because they are part of the lawsuit. “Upon such proof, it shall be presumed that the alteration in immigration status is in retribution for the exercise during the course of the present case of their First Amendment rights,” Young wrote.During last year's trial, witnesses for the government acknowledged that the campaign targeted more than 5,000 pro-Palestinian protesters. Other witnesses for the plaintiffs testified to how the campaign stoked fear among academics and prompted some to stop their activism.The three-judge panel of the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals didn’t decide the key issue in Khalil’s case: whether the Trump administration’s effort to throw Khalil out of the U.S. over his campus activism and criticism of Israel was unconstitutional. But in its 2-1 decision, the panel ruled a federal judge in New Jersey didn’t have jurisdiction to decide the matter at this time. Federal law requires the case to fully move through the immigration courts first, before Khalil can challenge the decision, they wrote.The decision marked a major win for the Trump administration’s sweeping campaign to detain and deport noncitizens who joined protests against Israel. But it was not immediately clear whether the government would seek to detain Khalil, a legal permanent resident, again while his legal challenges continue.. She said she was illegally detained following an op-ed piece she co-wrote last year criticizing her school’s response to Israel's war in Gaza. During the latest hearing in the case, Young repeatedly seemed baffled that the country's top leaders would attempt to implement such a policy. “How could this happen? How could our government’s highest officials seek to so infringe on the rights of people lawfully here in the United States,” he told the court. “The record in this case convinces me that these high officials, and I include the president of the United States, have a fearful view of freedom.” Ramya Krishnan, senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute, which argued for relief in court, said the “administration’s lawless efforts to deport pro-Palestinian advocates has spread terror in our campus communities.” “Students and scholars shouldn’t have to live in fear that ICE agents could seize them from their homes merely for engaging in political expression,” she said. “Today’s judgment makes emphatically clear that the administration’s campaign of intimidation must end.”

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

ABC /  🏆 471. in US

Trials Lawsuits Courts Legal Proceedings Politics Journalism Immigration Washington News General News Race And Ethnicity Education U.S. News Article 129475979

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

5 Democratic states asking judge to keep Trump from withholding money for child care5 Democratic states asking judge to keep Trump from withholding money for child careThe states say the move was instead intended to damage Trump’s political adversaries.
Read more »

Judge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in 5 states for nowJudge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in 5 states for nowA federal judge says the Trump administration must keep the money flowing for now for programs aimed at helping low-income families with children in five states.
Read more »

Judge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in 5 states for nowJudge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in 5 states for nowThe ruling extends by two weeks an earlier one ordering money to continue to flow.
Read more »

Don Lemon Issues Challenge After Judge Rejects Trump DOJ’s ChargesDon Lemon Issues Challenge After Judge Rejects Trump DOJ’s ChargesLemon vowed to keep reporting after a judge refused to sign a complaint tied to his presence at a protest at a Minnesota church.
Read more »

Judge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in Colorado — for nowJudge rules Trump administration must keep funding child care subsidies in Colorado — for nowThe judge said he’d decide later whether the money is to remain in place while a challenge to cutting it off works its way through the courts.
Read more »

Republican-appointed judge tosses Trump admin's voter lawsuitRepublican-appointed judge tosses Trump admin's voter lawsuitA Georgia judge tossed a Justice Department lawsuit seeking voter data after finding it was filed in the wrong federal district.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-01 08:18:39