The text discusses how Wikipedia's early commitment to a neutral point of view evolved into the site becoming the voice of the establishment, primarily due to the implementation of a 'reliable sources' policy.
. So how, you might ask, could a project committed to a “neutral point of view,” which in its early years featured quirky facts and honest opinions, end up being the voice of the establishment?
In the beginning, Wikipedia acknowledged that it was reasonable for extreme minority views to receive less attention than majority views. In August 2005, Wikipedians began to discourage giving “undue weight” to discredited ideas, which became the focus of a new policy push. By August 2011, Wikipedia wasand brandishing the loaded term “false balance” — a concept used by left-wing journalists to justify entirely omitting “false” ideas.
But this required that Wikipedia itself declare certain ideas to be false, which violated the original neutrality policy. No matter. A similar shift took place over how to deal with “pseudoscience. ” The original policy was to explain the mainstream scientific views of theories held to be pseudoscience, while also explaining what the theories themselves say.
By February 2009, however, Wikipedia had officially decided to label some theories as “fringe” in its own voice, again, despite this being directly contrary to the original neutrality policy. But, you might ask, who gets to decide which views are “false” and “fringe”? Maybe such labels are okay, if they really are applied only to “crazy talk. ” And so it might have been, at first.
The answer came in the form of the policy on “reliable sources,” introduced in 2005. Which views are “false” and “fringe”? Wikipedia’s answer: those that “reliable sources” uniformly regard as false or fringe. Initially, the policy had some good points.
But over the years, what “sources” were declared “unreliable” became increasingly restricted. Within a few years, Wikipedia had declared some sources “generally unreliable”; over the next decade, the screws gradually tightened. A watershed moment on the platform came in July 2018, when a giant table of so-called “perennial sources” was introduced, summarizing the results of “reliable source” discussions.
At about the same time, Wikipedia began systematically reviewing and restricting most conservative and non-establishment sources.sources regarded as “reliable,” many views that were previously tolerated on Wikipedia were branded “fringe” because they could not be supported by “reliable sources. ” The consequences range from absurd to outrageous. With a few exceptions, the Bible and other religious writings generally cannot be used, and anything suggesting the supernatural — including rigorous academic work by confessional Bible scholars — is ignored.
What happened in Gaza recently is described, in Wikipedia’s own voice, as a “genocide. ” Of course, acupuncture and chiropractic are labeled “pseudoscience”; but so are osteopathy and modern approaches to the quite ancient Argument from Design for the existence of God. The COVID-19 lab leak theory, which is now supported by many distinguished scientists, is dismissed in Wikipedia’s own voice as having “no evidence.
” The article helpfully adds, “Many scenarios proposed for a lab leak are characteristic of conspiracy theories. ” The political bias that results from omitting so many conservative sources is striking and easily demonstrated. Just compare the articles about Joe Biden and Donald Trump, or look at “Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory,” “Gamergate,” or “transgender youth. ” Consider just how frequently “conspiracy theorist” is applied to ordinary Republicans and conservative commentators.
A 2024 Manhattan Institute study by David Rozado did a rigorous analysis showing that there was far more negative sentiment attached to right-leaning politicians than to left-leaning ones. As icing on the cake, Wikipedia recently decided to label the GOP “a right-wing to far-right political party in the United States. ” The source for the label: the V-Dem Institute, a Sweden-based academic group that polls a small but highly international roster of political science professors, who are, of course,
Wikipedia Neutrality Establishment Reliable Sources Reliable Sources Policy Neutrality Policy Pseudoscience Fringe False Balance Undue Weight
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Citywide Quest: Do you know where these golf-themed photos were taken?The PGA Championship is happening now! We’ll show you a golf-themed photo taken in the city; you drop a pin where you think it was taken. Closer to the location results in a better score. Good luck!
Read more »
The Rise of Women's Handball in the U.S. and the Quest for an Olympic TeamThis article explores the growing interest in women's handball in the U.S. and the efforts to establish a competitive national team capable of representing the country at the Olympic Games. The article highlights the challenges faced by USA Handball in terms of resources, funding, and the lack of a strong and sustained program. It also introduces readers to Devyn Holbrook, a handball enthusiast who is on the road to becoming a professional handball player in the U.S., and the contributions of Sarah Gascon to the team and the program.
Read more »
Clothing Range Launched for Nudists as UK's Naturist Community Marks a Sarcastic ShiftA clothing line with humorous references to nudism has been launched by a body representing the UK's naturist community. The new range is marketed as ironic, even though it sells garments for people who prefer to be naked. The British Naturism website declares: 'A clothing line for people who don't like wearing clothes? That has to be the purest form of irony. Sometimes life insists you put something on. That doesn't mean turning your back on your principles.' Other products include beach-towels and sun-hats for naked get-togethers. The clothing line is part of a broader movement towards a more relaxed interpretation of naturism in the UK.
Read more »
Premium Brands Accelerate Shift from Plastic to Glass PackagingCompanies across food, beverage and beauty sectors are increasingly choosing glass over plastic to enhance perception, performance and positioning. A 2025 survey shows 89% of premium brands plan to switch to glass by 2026, driven by premiumization, consumer trust and the visual transparency glass provides, as well as its non‑porous, chemically inert qualities that appeal to health‑conscious shoppers.
Read more »