Behind the numbers: Learn how Forbes produced our first-ever list of Top Hospitals. This data-driven rating system showcases hospitals across the United States focused on outcomes, value, patient safety, and more.
ccessing high-quality healthcare in the United States has become increasingly complex. While technological advances have fostered extraordinary innovation in medicine and digital record keeping, the benefits have not always trickled down to patients.
Many who seek medical services face fragmented care, confusing instructions, skyrocketing costs, excessive waits and risk of medical complications.can be exacerbated by socioeconomic disparities, rendering the system especially challenging for those with fewer resources and those at their most vulnerable, managing illnesses or battling life-threatening conditions., a new tool—curated through extensive research and analysis—that is designed to provide consumers with unbiased information to help them choose the best hospitals for their healthcare needs. This inaugural hospital rating system aims to serve the interests of patients and provide healthcare leaders with empirical benchmarks to compare quality performance against their peers.has focused the ratings on “general acute care hospitals.” These facilities offer a wide range of services for urgent and short-term medical needs, including: the management of emergencies and injuries , serious conditions , surgical care , and childbirth. Unlike specialty hospitals—which typically focus on specific clinical areas and complex, high-risk cases—general acute care hospitals usually treat a greater number of common conditions, contain an emergency department , and provide healthcare services for more people each year. So, unless it’s critical to go immediately to the closest hospital , there areForbes’ Approach To Hospital Quality Ratings Forbes Top Hospitals—formally, the Forbes Overall Hospital Quality Ratings —are based on validated and objective indicators of outcomes, best practices, value and patient experience. Our methodology was created in consultation with healthcare measurement experts and an advisory panel consisting of clinicians, scientists, health policy and healthcare management researchers, and patient advocates.: The primary quality measures evaluated in the methodology come from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Data Catalog , which are. Each quality measure assesses a key aspect of healthcare, such as health outcomes, patient perceptions, organizational structures and system processes. These publicly reported measures are then used to determine the degree to which healthcare services are delivered efficiently, effectively, safely and equitably—while providing high-quality care.chose these measures specifically because they have been developed and regularly vetted by stakeholders in the healthcare community to meet a high national standard. This consensus-driven process involves:Public comment, during which anyone can offer feedback on the measuresThe methodology has placed the most weight on clinical outcomes so that outcomes have the most impact on each hospital’s overall rating.. By adjusting for these factors in the communities surrounding each hospital, our ratings allow for a more level comparison of each hospital’s quality, despite differences between any given hospital’s location and patient population.Given that the foundation of the methodology is the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Data Catalog ,began by identifying a subset of quality measures from the CMS PDC to include in our analysis. To do this, individual quality measures from the CMS PDC were further vetted and selected based on two primary factors. First, they were chosen because the measures were reliable proxies for healthcare performance. Second, the measures were chosen so that when grouped together, they reflected a balanced representation of various types of hospital quality measures . This process resulted in the selection of 56 publicly reported hospital quality measures for inclusion in the methodology. These measures—which, as noted above, have been established as reliable and verifiable indicators of healthcare quality—include hospital metrics such as “surgical site infection after colon surgery,” “30-day readmission after discharge,” “patients who left the emergency department before being seen,” and “inpatients who reported they were given information about recovery.” Next, to determine the universe of hospitals in consideration for the Forbes Overall Hospital Quality Ratings, we began with the 5,397 general acute care hospitals listed in the CMS PDC.methodology primarily assess adult care, and these facilities do not provide acute care medical services to adults. Psychiatric hospitals. These facilities do not provide the types of acute care medical services that are assessed through the majority of quality measures included in our methodology. After eliminating the hospitals described above, the pool of eligible hospitals totaled 4,601. From this group, we considered only hospitals that publicly reported minimum thresholds of the 56 quality measures in our methodology, which narrowed the number of eligible hospitals to 2,544. Note that the majority of specialty hospitals and all VA hospitals did not meet the minimum thresholds set for the 56 quality measures identified in our methodology. Therefore, the final group of 2,544 hospitals eligible for evaluation in’ hospital ratings does not include most specialty hospitals and does not include VA hospitals.. Each pillar was then assigned a weight based on a variety of factors that ultimately determined each pillar’s impact on a hospital’s overall rating. The pillar weights are: Outcomes , Best Practices , Value and Patient Experience . In order to compare ratings reported in different ways , each measure’s rating received a z-score that reflected its deviation from the overall mean. This allowed comparisons across measures and facilities. Because the measure results included some extreme outliers with highly irregular ratings—which could reflect errors in the data—the statistical technique of Winsorization was used to reduce their influence. Outcome measures were then adjusted for social drivers of health among the population living near the hospital based on each measure’s statistical relationship with these drivers. As noted above, societal and environmental factors—such as income and access to transportation—have been shown to impact health. For instance, a person without access to transportation is less likely to go to the doctor to get regular preventative medical care, which tends to lead to poorer health. Conversely, a person with sufficient resources who owns a car is more likely to have easy access to a doctor and to stay on top of preventative care, which tends to lead to better health. Adjusting outcome measures based on SDOH in a hospital’s geographical area is designed to level the playing field so that a hospital’s quality is evaluated in such a way that it factors in its location and the health of its patient population. The Outcomes pillar was also adjusted based on how each hospital performed in specific measures compared to the national average. Hospitals that frequently scored significantly higher than the national average received an upward adjustment to the Outcomes pillar.These pillar z-scores were normalized and weighted to produce an overall score for each facility on a scale of 0 to 1. This overall score for each facility was assigned an initial star rating on a scale of 1 to 5 stars, with 1 star representing lower performance and 5 stars representing higher performance. The stars represented the following percentiles:These initial star ratings were then tested—via a chi-square test—to ascertain any bias in the results based on hospital size . After stratifying the hospitals into four peer groups , this testing showed there was a statistically significant correlation between hospital size and star ratings. Therefore, peer grouping was conducted to ensure more level comparisons between differently sized hospitals. Finally, percentiles within each peer group were calculated, and in turn used to calculate the final Forbes Overall Hospital Quality Ratings.253 hospitals earned an overall rating of 5 starsVery Large HospitalsHow To Use Forbes Top Hospitals Ratings Forbes Top Hospitals ratings are not medical advice. They can assist people in learning about different providers, but the ultimate choice for care should be made by the patient or their loved ones in consultation with their medical provider. In any emergency, call 911. This rating system can also provide hospital leaders with a transparent and verifiable method through which they can compare their hospital’s performance to the performance of other facilities. To make these ratings as useful as possible to both patients and hospital leaders, Forbes welcomes your feedback. For any comments or questions about Forbes Overall Hospital Quality Ratings, please email: TopHospitals forbes.com.
Top Hospitals In America Top-Quality Hospitals Healthcare Quality Inovalon Top Hospitals In The United States Patient Safety Social Drivers Of Health Centers For Medicaid & Medicare CMS
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
30 Under 30 Finance 2026: From Fintech’s Top Founders To Wall Street’s Best DealmakersThese entrepreneurs, traders and investors are making an outsized impact in fintech, crypto and traditional financial services.
Read more »
By The Numbers: Meet The Forbes Under 30 Class Of 2026A look behind the statistics of the 2026 Under 30 List—from $3.8 billion in funding to 200 million fans online.
Read more »
Explore The Forbes 30 Under 30 2026Meet The Class Of 2026: 600 Go-getters Across 20 Industries-and A Sneak Peek Into Things To Come.
Read more »
Texas football 2026 recruiting hub: See Longhorns' 2026 classA look at Texas’ current recruiting class and where it stands. This article will be updated as players sign with schools.
Read more »
Texas Tech football 2026 recruiting hub: See Red Raiders' 2026 classFollow live updates of the Red Raiders during the first day of the early signing period
Read more »
Forbes Top Hospitals 2026Introducing our inaugural Forbes Top Hospitals list. Developed with measurement experts, clinicians, health policy researchers and patient advocates, the ratings showcase hospitals offering top-quality care.
Read more »