A study revealed that nearly half of judges at the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) lacked any past experience as a judge before becoming ECHR justices. Additionally, two 'ad hoc' judges with no prior experience were appointed for each member country. The article also discusses concerns over the quality of ECHR judges and the court's liberal rulings, primarily in climate change and human rights cases.
Nearly half of judges at the European Court of Human Rights did not sit on the bench in their home countries before being promoted to the controversial court.
Analysis shows 19 of 44 justices had no experience of being a judge before joining the Strasbourg court full-time. Several of them were career academics and civil servants or diplomats with no experience of presiding over a case. A further two of the total 46 judges - one for each member country - who sit at the ECHR were made ‘ad hoc’ justices despite having no previous experience in their homelands.
It comes amid growing concern about the quality of judges at Europe’s top human rights court and that it often overstretches its remit, with the Tories and Reform UK pledging to leave it if they win the next election. Lord Blencathra, a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, said: ‘We complain about the quality of judges but nothing ever changes and we’re getting more and more of these people.
‘Some of these people have never tried a case in their lives and some of them would not be good enough to teach in one of our worst polytechnic universities. 'We tend to think that we must follow what the Court says because we are dealing with top class judges like our Supreme Court. We’re not.
’ The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg has a total of 46 judges, one from each member country The European Court of Human Rights , in Strasbourg, is the final arbiter of the European Convention on Human Rights Lord Blencathra, a member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, said there are growing concerns about the quality of judges at the ECHR Referring to Green party leader Zack Polanski, he added: ‘Apart from the odd aberrations, the court is exceptionally liberal with a Polanski agenda even before Polanski came along.
’ In April 2024, the Strasbourg court, which is the final arbiter of the European Convention on Human Rights, sparked a furious backlash after ruling that Switzerland had violated the human rights of its citizens by failing to take sufficient action to combat climate change. In June 2022, it also blocked the then UK Tory government’s Rwanda deportation scheme from getting off the ground by issuing an 11th-hour interim injunction to halt it - while refusing to name the judge who issued it.
It has also ruled that the UK’s blanket ban on prisoner voting was a violation of Article 3 of Protocol 1, which guarantees the right to free elections, and that whole-life sentences for violent offenders amount to ‘inhuman or degrading treatment’ under Article 3 because there was no possibility of review or release. ECHR judges are put forward by member nations and voted on by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, the umbrella organisation for the Court and Convention which is separate to the European Union and which Britain remains a member of.
It comes after Sir Keir Starmer's government today signed a 'political declaration' at a summit in Moldova aimed at limiting the European Convention on Human Rights, which the Court is the final arbiter of. It aims to curb the number of illegal migrants and foreign criminals using the ECHR to avoid deportation.
However, critics have branded it a 'waste of time' because previous similar political declarations have failed to make much difference and the treaty's text remains unchanged. A Council of Europe spokesman acknowledged that many judges previously never sat on the bench in their home countries, adding: ‘Judges at the Court may be highly specialised legal academics, who are well qualified for adjudicating on human rights issues.
‘Other international courts, such as the International Court of Justice, also include prominent academics as judges. ‘The diversity of experience among the Court’s judges, who come from all parts of Europe and reflect its different legal traditions, brings a valuable range of legal expertise and professional profiles to the Court. ’
Law Human Rights European Court Of Human Rights Judges No Prior Judge Experience Career Academics Liberal Rulings Climate Change Human Rights
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Adopted baby 'abused and murdered by teacher' had human bite mark on his body, court hearsA teacher accused of sexually abusing and murdering a baby boy he was adopting with his boyfriend told a nurse 'you’ll think we’re abusing him' when she spotted a bruise on his forehead. Preston Davey had been taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital by Jamie Varley and John McGowan-Fazakerley with an apparent fever a few weeks before his death. The nurse discussed the bruise with her colleague because the film had made her feel ‘uneasy.’ Preston Davey died after suffering abuse and was found to have 40 injuries, a jury was told.
Read more »
Adopted baby 'abused and murdered by teacher' had human bite mark on his body, court hearsA teacher accused of sexually abusing and murdering a baby boy he was adopting with his boyfriend told a nurse 'you’ll think we’re abusing him' when she spotted a bruise on his forehead. Preston Davey had been taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital by Jamie Varley and John McGowan-Fazakerley with an apparent fever a few weeks before his death. The nurse discussed the bruise with her colleague because the film had made her feel uneasy. Preston Davey died after suffering abuse and was found to have 40 injuries, a jury was told. Dr Alison Armour dismissed Varley’s claims that Preston could have had a seizure and died because he inhaled his own vomit. The expert insisted that none of the bruises and other internal injuries Preston suffered could have been caused accidentally by hospital medics when they tried to save his life.
Read more »
Britain to Send Top Legal Adviser to European Human Rights SummitSir Keir Starmer will send his top legal adviser, Attorney General Lord Hermer, to a summit in Moldova to reassure European human rights chiefs that Britain is committed to the bloc's controversial treaty. Lord Hermer will prioritize talks over the future of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and ensure Britain does not breach its 'international obligations.' The summit aims to restrict the ECHR's Article 8 and Article 3, which protect the right to family life and the ban on inhumane treatment, respectively.
Read more »
UK ministers hailed an agreement to ease deportations of illegal migrants and foreign criminals at a summit in Moldova, but critics questioned its effectiveness.The UK and other European countries agreed on a 'political declaration' at the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) summit to ease deportations. However, critics questioned its significance as the controversial ECHR's text remained unchanged and previous similar agreements have not led to practical changes. Tory and Reform UK leaders vowed to leave the ECHR if they win the next election, claiming it is the only way to take back control of Britain's borders. The agreement aims to limit ECHR Articles 8 and 3, protecting the right to family life and banning inhumane treatment, respectively. But UK judges would still review deportation impact on individuals and deportation must align with human rights law, including for national security, public safety, and economic well-being.
Read more »