After four movies together (and a slew of awards attention), Emma Stone still has more room to grow in Yorgos Lanthimos' wide-angled frames.
, Jesse Hassenger looks at actors and directors who have worked together on at least three films, analyzing the nature of their collaborations. Certain types of roles are seen as easier pathways to Academy Award nominations.
Playing real people, whether celebrated or more obscure, is a big leg up. Alcoholics in various forms remain popular. Among women, wives in crisis come up a lot. In this field, aliens are less of a go-to. Yes, Jeff Bridges was nominated for, but the prevalence of visual effects, a view of science fiction as less serious than realistic drama, and the lack of easy comparison standards for how a human actor might play an alien has meant that there’s not much awards market for such otherworldly characters.screams Academy Awards, either; it nonetheless emerged from this year’s nominations with four, including one for Emma Stone, playing a high-powered CEO who also…well, suffice to say that the more you learn about Michelle Fuller, a pharmaceutical executive kidnapped by a pair of troubled, conspiracy-addled men, the less Oscar-friendly she will seem. Even so, Stone’s nomination was not seen as a particular surprise. After all, her record with filmmaker Yorgos Lanthimos has been pretty strong:is their fourth feature together, and three of those four movies have netted her Oscar nominations . Lanthimos films also represent the majority of Stone’s prodigious five acting nominations overall, and he’s yet to score a Best Picture nomination without her. Films endure or don’t based on their own merits and the many flukes of history, which may include awards as part of some complex, unknowable calculus, one just as likely to include supposed snubs as actual nominations or wins as part of a broader narrative. The degree to which the Stone/Lanthimos combination has proven particularly irresistible to Academy voters is notable. Though the awards body has diversified over the past decade, it’s strange to consider that Stone has helped sell Lanthimos to them in a way that even star-friendly and sometimes-awarded figures like At first, it seemed more like Lanthimos was helping to repackage Stone than the other way around. Both of Stone’s nominations beforeoffer distinct points of view and wildly different characters for Stone to inhabit. Good as Stone is in these movies—and if anything, her open-hearted mix of classic-romance vivacity and aching vulnerability inhas been undervalued over time, swept up into the generalization that the Oscars like to award female ingenues but prefer men to accumulate some middle-aged gravitas—their Hollywood stories also tip her scales away from the more sui generis aspect of her persona., Stone established her appeal with a mix of girl-next-door guilelessness and child-actor poise . That continued as Stone performed the then-standard dance between high school, college, and twentysomething roles over the next decade: She obviously had comic chops, but she could use them to play convincingly gawky, too, even selling whoppers like her character being socially invisible at the outset of, her second of three collaborations with Ryan Gosling. She looks the part of an Old Hollywood dame, but can’t quite get the part out of the quotation marks that surround everyone in the movie. Compare that misadventure with her peer Jennifer Lawrence, who came up around the same time; she had so much credibility that David O. Russell could repeatedly cast her beyond her age range and only receive further Oscar attention. While Lawrence was playing troubled housewives in her early twenties, even Stone’s grittiest role, the recovering addict inThis is why the Stone-Lanthimos partnership doesn’t feel like a simple case of an Oscar-darling actress helping to legitimize a mischievous scamp-provocateur in the eyes of Hollywood. Lanthimos’s Greek film, a bleak drama discomfiting enough to qualify as horror-adjacent, was nominated for the 2010 Best Foreign Language Film Oscar. His alternate-world parable of love and lonelinessreceived a Best Original Screenplay nomination a few years later. Both of these movies seem too out-there for awards attention, and yet there they were. The disturbing premise of, where a couple’s adult children are kept in a state of highly controlled, sheltered, and perverse childhood, could almost read as a parody of the type of forever-ingenue roles that actresses like Stone are pressed to play well into their twenties, sometimes even thirties. Stone convincingly embodied other adults before playing Abigail Hill, the usurping cousin of Sarah Churchill , secret lover of Queen Anne in 18th-century England, for Yorgos Lanthimos in. But costume drama, even with a bawdy black-comic streak, was not seen as her forte. As it turns out, though, Stone wears costumes well: As Abigail rises in status from scullery maid to replacement for Sarah, she looks increasingly resplendent in her own presumed security, until she’s wielding her body not just to pleasure Queen Anne, but to half-crush one of Anne’s beloved pet rabbits beneath her heel. Much has been made of how Lanthimos uses fish-eye lenses in many scenes of, but just as crucial is the camera’s positioning at a low angle, so the characters constantly look like a combination of towering, distorted, and lonely in the elaborately art-directed frames. This is on a spectrum with Lanthimos’ other visual strategies, like how the camera frequently faux-misframes the characters in, letting them extend past its field of vision, making them look particularly overgrown and ill-fitting in these constricted, constructed kidult roles. But what’s actually seen in the frame represents a major departure from Stone’s earlier girl-next-door vibes, where even her iconic looks inlooks more superficially ready for the Oscars, and the Academy followed suit. For Stone specifically, however, these Lanthimos films offer an appropriately weird hybrid. The go-for-broke physical presence she has as Abigail and especially Bella Baxter, the dead woman revived and reborn through mad science in, she gleefully played Gilda Radner’s Roseanne Roseannadanna on the show’s 40th anniversary special, and she’s married torevel in ribald slapstick, with Bella peeing and smashing and stabbing before she graduates to verbal bluntness. As easy as it is to admire the toddling physicality of Bella’s early days, and as much work as it probably represented for Stone, it’s also shtick—albeit high-minded shtick accompanied by a carnality that, even given the disturbing couplings of, comes from their deadpan stillness and strange dialogue, where the characters talk with a hushed, banal formality like, well, aliens disguised as humans, rendering their relationships particularly remote and unsexy. It’s no wonder, then, that the alien-among-us paranoia of. The idea of imprecisely sourced foreignness is intrinsic to Lanthimos’ reputation in the U.S., with unspoken questions of: What’s this guy’s deal? Is he some kind of weirdo pervert running a theater of cruelty, or is he just European? As much as his awards success feels like a foothold from a more international-skewing Academy membership, it’s also markedly increased as he’s moved into English-language productions.. In the middle section of that film, Stone plays Liz, a woman who returns after being presumed lost and likely dead at sea, greeted by a husband who simply refuses to believe it’s her. Convinced she’s an imposter, he demands increasingly gruesome acts of devotion, and she complies, nonetheless failing to win his acceptance. As in, albeit more obtusely, the story ends with the suggestion that Plemons was right all along. After Liz dies while performing one of her husband’s impossible, mutilating gestures, another, identical Liz appears at his doorstep and embraces him. Somehow this feels more like a sick joke than the species-annihilating finale of, where Michelle eventually reveals that she is, in fact, an alien put on Earth to observe the planet before deciding that human life is not worth saving. There’s an undeniable boldness and brashness in repeatedly using Emma Stone, a sparkling movie-star presence, as a tool of fantastical deception. It’s a clever trick, rooting audience sympathy in the idea that Stone must be who she says she is while exploiting the idea that we’re prone to “believe” movie stars even as they explicitly play pretend for a living. “You got a real human response out of me there, which is impressive, given your cellular composition and all,” the Plemons character fromtells Michelle early in his kidnapping. He could be describing the inherent fakeness of any acting. Bella represents, among other things, a Frankensteinian synthesis of Stone’s early-career arcs as well as the director’s observations about the wobbly transition from childhood to adulthood. Somehow, this riff on a famous horror story is his only movie that ends with an unambiguous sense of contentment.—that could easily pass for moments from the broad comedies she mostly avoids these days. But these moments pop in part because she submits so thoroughly to the mood of the film at hand, something that carried over so thoroughly to the rigors of Ari Aster’sthat she intentionally recedes from the movie as she acts in it. The quality of Lanthimos and Stone’s work together hasn’t flagged over the past eight years, and the idea that it was these movies, of all things, that have made Stone an Oscar darling is both gratifying and hilarious. But their collaboration still leaves more room for Stone to grow up within her favorite director’s wide-angle frame.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Emma Stone’s New Best Actress Nomination Officially Makes Oscars History With 7 NodsEmma Stone has broken an Oscars record with her seven nominations as a producer and actor over the years, having won two Lead Actress awards.
Read more »
Timothée Chalamet, Emma Stone, & More Break Oscars Records With 2026 NomsSeveral actors and creatives, including Timothée Chalamet and Emma Stone, broke records with the 2026 Oscar nominations.
Read more »
‘Sinners,’ Timothee Chalamet, and Emma Stone Just Set 2026 Oscar Nomination RecordsThere may be no new EGOT winners following the ceremony—but there are still plenty of records to potentially break.
Read more »
Emma Stone Just Broke Oscar Nominations Records With Her ‘Bugonia’ NodsStone was nominated in the best actress and best picture categories, the latter for her producer role on the film.
Read more »
Emma Stone broke this Oscar record held by Meryl Streep with 'Bugonia' nodsReady the red carpet. The 2026 Oscar nominations were announced on Thursday morning, kicking off the final stretch of Hollywood’s long award season.
Read more »
Yorgos Lanthimos and Emma Stone somehow made each other Oscar darlingsAfter four movies together (and a slew of awards attention), Emma Stone still has more room to grow in Yorgos Lanthimos' wide-angled frames.
Read more »