Research reveals that while corporate executives often use war metaphors to project strength, these aggressive terms can provoke negative reactions from financial analysts who perceive them as signs of excessive risk.
Corporate executives often use war metaphors like “declaring war on the competition” to project strength and confidence in their strategies. Research reveals that these aggressive metaphors may provoke negative reactions from a critical audience: financial analysts. After analyzing nearly 1,000 acquisition announcements, the authors find that war-related language tends to trigger negative reactions from analysts, who see it as a sign of excessive risk.
In 2006, then-CEO of the McClatchy Company, Gary Pruitt,, “The stakes have never been higher … and we dare not go into battle with anything less than the best.” In a 2015 conference call with analysts, executives at Infinera Corporation were “armed with an end-to-end offering.” In a 2013 call, Veeco Instruments described the mobile market as a “battleground,” and in 2009 First Solar described their acquisition move as an “offensive” aimed at overtaking competitors.
CORPORATE COMMUNICATION FINANCIAL ANALYSTS RISK ASSESSMENT METAPHORS BUSINESS STRATEGY
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
War Metaphors in Corporate Communication Trigger Negative Reactions from Financial AnalystsResearch reveals that corporate executives' frequent use of war metaphors to describe business strategies can backfire, particularly when communicating with financial analysts. War-related language tends to be perceived as a sign of excessive risk by analysts, leading to negative reactions, especially when analysts believe avoiding direct competition is in the company's best interest.
Read more »
War Metaphors in Corporate Communication Backfire with Financial AnalystsResearch shows that using war metaphors in business communication, while intended to project strength, can actually trigger negative reactions from financial analysts. These analysts view such language as a sign of excessive risk, especially when the company's best interest lies in avoiding direct competition.
Read more »
War Metaphors in Corporate Communication Backfire with AnalystsResearch shows that aggressive war metaphors used by corporate executives in announcements can trigger negative reactions from financial analysts. Analysts perceive such language as a sign of excessive risk, especially when avoiding direct competition is deemed beneficial. The study emphasizes the importance of carefully chosen language for companies as it significantly influences how their actions are perceived.
Read more »
War Metaphors in Corporate Communication: Triggering Negative Reactions from Financial AnalystsResearch reveals that aggressive war metaphors used by corporate executives in communication, particularly in acquisition announcements, can provoke negative reactions from financial analysts. Analysts perceive such language as a sign of excessive risk and a deviation from strategic prudence.
Read more »
War Metaphors in Business: A Risky Strategy?Research suggests that corporate executives' use of war metaphors in strategic communication, while intended to project strength, may backfire with financial analysts. The study, analyzing over 1,000 acquisition announcements, found that war-related language often triggers negative reactions from analysts who perceive it as a sign of excessive risk, particularly when analysts believe avoiding direct competition is in the company's best interest. The findings highlight the importance of carefully choosing metaphors in corporate communication as they significantly influence how audiences perceive actions.
Read more »
Research: When CEOs Use War Metaphors, Analysts WorryCorporate executives often use war metaphors like “declaring war on the competition” to project strength and confidence in their strategies. Research reveals that these aggressive metaphors may provoke negative reactions from a critical audience: financial analysts.
Read more »