U.S. Supreme Court lets California ban flavored tobacco products

United States News News

U.S. Supreme Court lets California ban flavored tobacco products
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 Reuters
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 18 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 11%
  • Publisher: 97%

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday cleared the way for California to enforce a voter-approved ban in America's most-populous state on flavored tobacco products, rejecting R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's bid to block it on the grounds that the policy conflicted with federal law.

, and other plaintiffs to put on hold the ban on selling all flavored tobacco products in the state - including for vaping - that was overwhelmingly endorsed through a ballot measure on Nov. 8.

But nearly two-thirds of voters casting ballots on the measure known as Proposition 31 approved the sales ban. The law would make California the second state to ban all flavored tobacco product sales after Massachusetts in 2019. Several other states have restricted flavored vaping products and several municipalities have adopted their own bans.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Reuters /  🏆 2. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banSupreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.
Read more »

Supreme Court Won't Block California Flavored Tobacco BanSupreme Court Won't Block California Flavored Tobacco BanThe Supreme Court has refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November. R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the high court’s intervention to keep the ban from taking effect by Dec. 21. There was no additional comment from the justices Monday and no noted dissents. The ban was first passed by the state legislature two years ago but it never took effect after tobacco companies gathered enough signatures to put it on the ballot. But nearly two-thirds of voters approved of banning the sale of everything from cotton-candy vaping juice to menthol cigarettes.
Read more »

Supreme Court upholds California ban on flavored tobaccoSupreme Court upholds California ban on flavored tobaccoThe Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid from the tobacco industry to block a California ban on flavored tobacco products.
Read more »

Supreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banSupreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banCalifornia will be the second state in the nation, after Massachusetts, to enact a ban prohibiting the sale of all flavored tobacco products.
Read more »

Supreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banSupreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banThe Supreme Court has refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.
Read more »

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Michigan State's appeal in Title IX swimming caseU.S. Supreme Court rejects Michigan State's appeal in Title IX swimming caseThe U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to consider how strictly to interpret the landmark Title IX civil rights law's protections for gender equality in college sports in a lawsuit challenging Michigan State University's elimination of its women's swimming and diving team.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-24 02:24:38