The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a bid from the tobacco industry to block a California ban on flavored tobacco products.
The emergency plea was brought by R.J. Reynolds, a unit of British American Tobacco, and other major tobacco companies seeking to stop or delay the measure, which is set to take effect next week.In this photo illustration, packs of menthol cigarettes sits on a table in New York City.The ban, or Proposition 31, was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November and will prohibit the sale of most flavored tobacco products, including menthol cigarettes.
The law was first passed two years ago, but tobacco companies successfully funded a campaign to block its implementation and put the issue on this year's statewide ballot.R.J. Reynolds, which sells Newport menthol cigarettes, argued the ban contradicts the Tobacco Control Act of 2009, a federal law that prohibits states from blocking the sale of tobacco products.
"They can raise the minimum purchase age, restrict sales to particular times and locations, and enforce licensing regimes," lawyers for the plaintiffs wrote in their. "But one thing they cannot do is completely prohibit the sale of those products for failing to meet the state's or locality's preferred tobacco product standards."
The plaintiffs also argued that the tobacco industry will face "substantial financial losses" from the law. Menthol cigarettes make up about a third of the market in California, they told the Court.Some California cities, including Los Angeles and San Diego, have already enacted such bans on flavored tobacco products and menthol cigarettes.
Once the statewide law takes effect, California will become the second state in the nation, after Massachusetts, to enact a statewide ban.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Supreme Court won't block California flavored tobacco banWASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November.
Read more »
Supreme Court Won't Block California Flavored Tobacco BanThe Supreme Court has refused a request from tobacco companies to stop California from enforcing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly approved by voters in November. R.J. Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the high court’s intervention to keep the ban from taking effect by Dec. 21. There was no additional comment from the justices Monday and no noted dissents. The ban was first passed by the state legislature two years ago but it never took effect after tobacco companies gathered enough signatures to put it on the ballot. But nearly two-thirds of voters approved of banning the sale of everything from cotton-candy vaping juice to menthol cigarettes.
Read more »
Governor Ivey asks AL Supreme Court to modify execution lawGovernor Ivey is asking that the Department of Corrections undertake a top-to-bottom review of the state’s execution process, and how to ensure the state can successfully deliver justice going forward.
Read more »
Governor Ivey asks AL Supreme Court to modify execution lawGovernor Ivey is asking that the Department of Corrections undertake a top-to-bottom review of the state’s execution process, and how to ensure the state can successfully deliver justice going forward.
Read more »
Supreme Court to Hear Biden’s Appeal on Student Debt DecisionThe U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday it will hear arguments in a second legal challenge related to President Joe Biden’s student debt forgiveness plan.
Read more »
Ivey asks Alabama Supreme Court to change rule affecting execution protocolGov. Kay Ivey is asking the Alabama Supreme Court for more time to carry out an execution following recent issues with the state’s current execution process.
Read more »