This article argues that President Trump's actions in his second term, including his disregard for a TikTok ban, his unilateral control over federal spending, and his attempt to redefine birthright citizenship, represent a dangerous assault on the constitutional order. It highlights the lack of response from Congress and warns that these actions, if unchecked, could fundamentally reshape the balance of power in the United States.
President Donald Trump has spent the first weeks of his second term demonstrating exactly why the framers of our Constitution created a system of checks and balances . Through a series of legally dubious executive orders, Trump has effectively declared himself above the law, free to ignore Congress , and rewrite constitutional interpretation at will. His actions on TikTok, federal spending, and birthright citizenship represent nothing less than a direct assault on our constitutional order.
The media might be downplaying it, but we are now in the throes of a constitutional crisis.In the opening day of his second term, Trump chose to simply ignore a bipartisan law banning TikTok that was affirmed by a unanimous Supreme Court. The law couldn't be clearer—TikTok was to be banned unless specific divestiture conditions were met. Yet Trump, apparently swayed by wealthy donors with financial stakes in ByteDance and his own personal political calculations, has decided the law doesn't apply to him. Trump's executive order that overrode Congress' clear directive to shut down TikTok puts him squarely in what Supreme Court Justice Jackson famously called the 'lowest ebb' of presidential power, meaning that he is acting against the express will of Congress. Nevertheless, TikTok remains active, and Congress sits silently, simply allowing this unilateral usurpation of power by a president.Empowered by this legislative acquiescence, Trump has now decided to put a freeze on all federal aid that does not fit with his agenda. This is in spite of the fact that the Constitution explicitly grants Congress, not the president, the power of the purse. By unilaterally deciding which congressionally appropriated funds will actually be spent, Trump is attempting to seize a fundamental legislative power for himself. This echoes his first term's emergency declaration to fund a border wall, another instance where he tried to circumvent Congress' spending authority that was rightfully challenged in court. Perhaps most alarming is Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, which attempts to unilaterally rewrite the 14th Amendment's unambiguous guarantee that 'All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States.' The Supreme Court has consistently held this applies to children of all residents, regardless of immigration status. A president cannot override the most fundamental of constitutional rights by executive fiat, yet that's exactly what Trump is attempting to do.The common thread running through these actions is a dangerous theory of unlimited executive power. Trump appears to believe that his constitutional responsibility for national security and foreign policy grants him authority to ignore any law he finds inconvenient. This goes far beyond traditional exercises of executive discretion or even controversial signing statements. Trump is essentially claiming the power to nullify laws and constitutional provisions at will. This presents Congress with a stark choice—it can defend its constitutional prerogatives or accept a fundamental reshaping of our system of government. Republican lawmakers who thundered about executive overreach during the Obama administration now face a president explicitly claiming the power to override their legislative authority. Their response so far ranges from quiet acquiescence to active defense of Trump's actions, illustrating institutional loyalty's death at the hands of partisanship.The courts will inevitably be called upon to referee these conflicts, but by the time cases wind their way through the torpid judicial system, significant damage to our constitutional order will already be done. Every day these executive orders remain in effect is another day where the president's will supersedes the law of the land. This is precisely the kind of crisis the Founding Fathers sought to prevent through separation of powers. A president who can ignore laws passed by Congress and affirmed by courts is no longer a president, he's a monarch. Unless Congress and the courts forcefully check these unprecedented assertions of executive power, Trump's second term may permanently alter the constitutional balance that has preserved our democracy for over two centuries
TRUMP CONSTITUTION EXECUTIVE POWER CONGRESS JUDICIAL REVIEW CHECKS AND BALANCES CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump's Second Inauguration Draws Smallest TV Audience Since Obama's Second TermAn estimated 24.6 million television viewers watched President Donald Trump's second inauguration, marking the lowest viewership for the event since Barack Obama's second inauguration in 2013. This figure is down from both Joe Biden's 2021 inauguration (33.8 million) and Trump's first inauguration in 2017 (30.6 million). Nielsen attributes the decline partly to the extended coverage time, which may have led viewers to tune out as the day progressed.
Read more »
Lara Trump: Donald Trump is Surrounding Himself with Trustworthy People in Second TermLara Trump, during a Breitbart Fight Club Roundtable, highlighted key differences in her father-in-law's second term compared to his first. She emphasized the importance of surrounding himself with trustworthy individuals, acknowledging that personnel issues were a challenge during his first term.
Read more »
Republican Representative Proposes Constitutional Amendment for Trump to Seek Third TermRep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee introduced a resolution to amend the U.S. Constitution, allowing President Donald Trump to serve a third term. He argues that Trump is essential to reversing America's decline and restoring its greatness.
Read more »
GOP Congressman Proposes Constitutional Amendment for Trump's Third TermRep. Andy Ogles introduces a resolution to allow President Trump and future presidents to serve three terms, sparking debate about the 22nd Amendment and Trump's potential future in politics.
Read more »
Constitutional amendment to allow Trump third term introduced in the HousePresident Donald Trump has hinted at the possibility of somehow serving a third term in office.
Read more »
Republican Congressman Proposes Constitutional Amendment to Allow Trump a Third TermRep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee introduces a resolution to amend the U.S. Constitution, seeking to lift the two-term limit for presidents and enable Donald Trump to run for a third term. The move comes after Trump's second, non-consecutive term inauguration. Ogles argues that Trump is essential for restoring America's greatness and deserves the opportunity to continue leading. However, the proposal faces an uphill battle in the narrowly divided House and is unlikely to garner widespread Democratic support.
Read more »