Dylan Southern's movie is deadeningly pretentious, even as its title character looms up like something out of a megaplex horror film.
‘The Thing with Feathers’ Review: Benedict Cumberbatch Plays a Widowed Father in a Movie That’s Overly Literal About Turning Grief into — Yes — an Oversize Crow Dylan Southern's movie is deadeningly pretentious, even as its title character looms up like something out of a megaplex horror film.
‘Ricky’ Review: Powerful Sundance Drama About a Young Man Just Out of Prison Navigating a World of Booby Traps Establishes Rashad Frett as a Born Filmmakerplays a London creator of graphic novels who, quite suddenly, finds himself a widower . In an early scene, we see him try and sustain an atmosphere of everyday normality as he puts breakfast together for his two young sons. But it’s not happening. He feels like he’s juggling four tasks at once; he burns the toast and then frantically tries to scrape off the charred part . The character, who is never named , has already shown the depths of his grief, sitting on the couch after the funeral, his tears slowly gushing forth. When Benedict Cumberbatch enacts a moment like this, you can bet that you’re not just seeing an actor cry; you’re seeing him act with every tear. Cumberbatch, in a few moments, expresses the depth of this father’s agony, the terrifying chasm of it.Italian Journalist and Podcaster Cecilia Sala Freed by Iran Following 'Intensive' Diplomatic Effort But that early-morning kitchen episode captures a different aspect of grief. It reminded me of the scene in “Kramer vs. Kramer” where Dustin Hoffman, as a newly separated father now alone with his son, tries to hold it together by making breakfast, which turns into a mini disaster. Part of the power of “Kramer vs. Kramer” is that it understands — more than other divorce movies do — that one of the miseries of a marriage ending is suddenly having to do everything you depended on your spouse for. It’s not that the loss is merely logistical; that, however, is a real part of it. At one point in “The Thing with Feathers,” Cumberbatch says that he relied on his wife for…everything. For a while, I had hopes that the movie, with a lacerating intimacy, would dramatize how insanely overwhelming the life of a widower like this one might be — emotionally, spiritually, practically.What I wasn’t counting on was the things with feathers. It starts off as a bird — a crow, to be precise, which imposes itself on the audience in closeup shock cuts of beak and wings, like something out of a horror film. It makes sense, in a way, to say that the sudden loss of a spouse could summon a primal feeling of horror. Yet in “The Thing with Feathers,” we’re a bit surprised to see this expressed through randomly staged jump scares. Why is this crow hovering around anyway?— or the herald of one. For just as Cumberbatch and his two boys, who are also never named , are contending with this intrusive, cawing, wing-shuffling feathered foe, there’s an even more majestic menace on hand: an eight-foot tall giant crow, known as…, who speaks, courtesy of the actor David Thewlis, in a voice of sinister British portent, as if he were the Scarecrow of Romney Marsh crossed with Edgar Allen Poe’s Raven saying “Nevermore!” He says things like “Good morning, English widower! Sleep well, did we?” At first, he appears to be there to harass and terrorize Cumberbatch, or maybe to act as an embodiment of his fears. And he is indeed kind of a projection: of the woe and alienation Cumberbatch is feeling. For Cumberbatch, trapped in the muck of his pain, is employing art as his way out. Seated in his home studio, he uses black ink to draw elaborate pictures that look like they came out of a gothic nightmare. They will be the illustrations of his new graphic novel. So is he dreaming all this up? Maybe, but Crow is quite literally: a menacing big bird who has come into the room to interface with Cumberbatch, to be his supernatural playmate and philosopher and tough-love therapist. This demon bird may look intimidating, but he is there to heal. There’s a bit of tony pretense involved. A Wikipedia entry informs me that Crow “is the Crow from Ted Hughes’ 1970 poetry book.” Well! It still looks like something out of a megaplex fright flick. “The Thing with Fathers” is a getting-over-grief movie that strands itself in a netherworld between psychological drama and “dark” fantasy. Written and directed by Dylan Southern, who based it on Max Porter’s 2015 novella “Grief is the Things with Feathers,” the film is quite taken with its own ambition, which it signifies visually, with a nearly square aspect ratio and images of burnished gloom. But the whole thing is oppressive and, in an odd way, not very interesting. Crow never becomes a gripping character; he’s too sternly abstract, too hectoring, too much of a visual effect in search of a personality. And his big lesson, while unassailable, is not exactly the stuff of revelation. It seems that the film wants to preach a message about the distinction between grief and despair. Grief, it suggests, is good, despair not so much. Anyone who has suffered a tragedy needs to grieve, to confront and deal with it — but there’s a difference between honest grieving and wallowing in your pain. Easier said than done, perhaps, but for a drama about grief this plays like something out of Mental Health 101. Cumberbatch, of course, has to go too far — into wallowing — or there wouldn’t be a movie. He needs to dance like a madman at midnight while drunk as a skunk on whiskey. The actor colors in many moments with honest feeling, but he has no one to play off. The film so fails to characterize the two boys that it barely distinguishes between them. And that relationship, between a father and his sons as they negotiate their new life and attempt to wriggle out of the claws of the despair demon, should have been central. Instead, we’re stuck with a solitary character locked in a ritualized interface with his ominous feathered friend. Which turns out to be a rather bird-brained idea.‘The Thing with Feathers’ Review: Benedict Cumberbatch Plays a Widowed Father in a Movie That’s Overly Literal About Turning Grief into — Yes — an Oversize CrowCNN Shakes Up TV Lineup With New Duties for Jake Tapper, Kasie Hunt, Wolf Blitzer, Audie Cornish, Rahel SolomonParamount Hit With Legal Letter to Consider Last-Minute $13.5 Billion Offer From Outside Investors Over Skydance Bid Dark Horse Comics Drops Neil Gaiman After Sexual Assault Allegations, Cancels ‘Anansi Boys’ Comic SeriesFacing Backlash Over Firing Its Meteorologists, Allen Media Group Learns an Important Lesson: Take the ‘Local’ Out of Local TV At Your Own… ‘Happy’s Place’ Casts ‘Reba’ Alum Christopher Rich, ‘One Day at a Time’ Star Justina Machado in Guest Roles… ‘Wolf Hall’ Director Says ‘Mirror and the Light’ Was Turned Down by Every Streamer: ‘We Need to Ensure’ They ‘Don’t Drive U.K.-Skewed Drama Out of… Benedict Cumberbatch Texted Kevin Feige ‘What the F—?’ Over Robert Downey Jr. as Doctor Doom; They Won’t Face Off Until ‘Secret Wars’ in… ‘A Complete Unknown’ Director James Mangold Says There’s Hostility to Movies That ‘Wear Their Heart on Their Sleeve’: We ‘Shouldn't Be Embarrassed to…. We use vendors that may also process your information to help provide our services. // This site is protected by reCAPTCHA Enterprise and the Google
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl - New Adventure Brings Back Feathers McGrawNick Park and Merlin Crossingham return with a new Wallace & Gromit adventure, 'Vengeance Most Fowl', where Wallace's latest invention, a 'smart' gnome, goes rogue. Gromit must face sinister forces to save his master and prevent Wallace from losing his inventing abilities forever.
Read more »
Interview: Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl Directors on Feathers McGraw’s Epic ReturnComingSoon's Brandon Schreur spoke to Nick Park and Merlin Crossingham about the new Wallace & Gromit: Vengeance Most Fowl movie.
Read more »
Feathers McGraw's Chase: An Unfortunate Echo or a Worthy Successor?The new Wallace and Gromit film, 'Feathers McGraw', attempts to deliver a climactic chase sequence that lives up to the legacy of its predecessor, a sequence widely considered one of the greatest ever made. The text analyzes the challenges the filmmakers faced in trying to match the brilliance of the original while finding its own unique identity.
Read more »
How Aardman Made Wallace & Gromit‘s Silent Villain WorkWhether it's 1993 or 2025, Feathers McGraw always pushes his creators to their animation limits.
Read more »
Why giving Jurassic Park's velociraptors feathers is a good thingFeedback is delighted by a YouTuber's sterling efforts to make Michael Crichton's velociraptors more accurate – but points out that they're still far too big
Read more »
‘The Thing With Feathers’ Review: A Go-for-Broke Benedict Cumberbatch Unravels in a Movie Stuck Awkwardly Between Horror and PsychodramaDylan Southern adapts the Max Porter novella, ‘Grief Is the Thing With Feathers,’ about a widowed father and the menacing giant crow that attaches itself to his sorrow.
Read more »