Personal Perspective: Holding companies liable for patterns of engagement and behavior outcomes is a slippery slope.
The judgment holding Google and Meta liable for social media addiction isn't based on true medical diagnosis.The verdict delivered on March 25, 2026, holding Meta and Google responsible for purposefully designing social media platforms to be addictive, and knowing it can be harmful, is flawed at multiple levels.
is not a one-dimensional construct that is contributed to by a single factor. The ruling ignores extensive medical research showing that a multitude of factors increase or decrease the risk of addictive behaviors. Genetic proclivity, co-existence of other mental health conditions, lack of adequate parental oversight, isolation, andAs a psychiatrist, I wholeheartedly agree that millions of people engage with social media at times in an unhealthy way. However, in order to effectively mitigate harmful effects that can occur, we must understand the root causes. Simply blaming Meta and Google is a massive oversimplification and will likely reinforce the problem by both ignoring certain important causes as well as creating a financial incentive for proving harmful effects.diagnoses, does not consider social media addiction to be a legitimate diagnosis. According to the American Psychiatric Association , there is insufficient scientific evidence that social media use results in clinically significant impairment or distress to a degree that classifies it inas an addictive disorder . It is actively being investigated as an area of concern, but the APA’s current position is that “social media is not inherently beneficial or harmful to young people” . This is based on studies conducted with thousands of adolescents using standardized assessments. The legal argument is therefore based on a medical diagnosis that does not exist.Holding companies responsible for patterns of engagement and individual behavioral outcomes is a dangerous, slippery slope. What is the role of personal agency in The business model for social media, of course, is designed to attract users as is customary for businesses in general. We have not held companies such as Starbucks or Dunkin' Donuts responsible for causing an obesity epidemic. These companies knowingly promote food and drinks containing processed sugars, which contribute to weight gain and food addictions. They do this to earn a profit. The personal and societal toll related to serious medical problems resulting from obesity is well documented. Are these companies next in line to be held legally liable?sales in this country? Alcohol is legal for individuals over age 20, yet underage drinking among high school and college students is rampant. The brain is still developing until the age of about 26. For those who become addicted, should companies such as Anheuser-Busch or Heineken be held responsible for the negative consequences caused by alcohol consumption? If a 21-year-old intoxicated driver harms someone in a crash, should the law hold Anheuser-Busch responsible? Should an individual who chooses to drive drunk be rewarded with a financial settlement from Anheuser-Busch? Cannabis is legal in 24 states in the U.S. as of 2026 and is widely available. It is available for those over age 20 but is commonly used by adolescents as early as junior high school. A growing body of scientific literature shows that cannabis can decreasebreaks. Yet when these bad outcomes occur, the cannabis industry is not held accountable. The industry makes billions of dollars in profits each year, despite clear evidence of toxicity to the brain and increased risk of addiction, often due to extremely high THC content. Should casinos be required to pay the gambling debts for those who become addicted? Are casinos somehow supposed to screen out those patrons who may not know when to stop gambling or when something enjoyable becomes harmful? What about credit card companies? If someone gets into debt from excessive shopping, should American Express or Discover be legally responsible to pay these debts? Could an argument be made that credit card companies are to blame because they extended credit to those who were harmed by a shopping addiction? Did their actions directly lead to an individual’s overspending using credit? To hold social media companies responsible for creating addictive behaviors in adolescents is a one-dimensional perspective that, at best, is grossly oversimplified and inaccurate, and at worst, sets a dangerous precedent about personal responsibility.Lori Plutchik, M.D.,Self Tests are all about you. Are you outgoing or introverted? Are you a narcissist? Does perfectionism hold you back? Find out the answers to these questions and more with Psychology Today.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
How Everyone Lost the DHS Shutdown ShowdownPerspective: There is little to celebrate for Republicans, Democrats and, most importantly of all, American voters.
Read more »
The band behind the basket: tournament game days from the perspective of The Pride of ArizonaAlex discovered her passion for journalism at a second-hand bookstore, spending hours sitting cross-legged in the magazine section.Email alex.dowdkgun9.com or find her on Instagram/X thisisalexdowd.
Read more »
Personal Perspective: How might we find time to slow down and actually think?Personal Perspective: Why we should all find time for a walk in the woods.
Read more »
Who packs for family trips, and why is it always the mom?Massachusetts mom and mental load expert Paige Connell put packing in perspective on social media.
Read more »
Personal Perspective: A lesson in gardening and parenting.Parents and gardening are similar in how people learn to balance between providing support and instilling self-reliance.
Read more »
Personal Perspective: For emotional well-being, identity must be broad and deep.When we reduce ourselves to labels—race, gender, profession, nationality, ideology, success, failure—we mistake the labels for the essence of who we are.
Read more »