The patient progress note plays a huge role in hospital medicine, and repeated studies have found them lacking. One hospital system is trying to change that.
Crafting the ideal patient progress note, at least judging from the literature, seems more easily achieved in theory than in execution. Since the late 2000s, when the electronic health record replaced pen and paper in chronicling a hospital patient’s story, from entry to exit,have struggled with house staff to make entries into the patient’s record that actually mirror the patient’s progress.
Various articles over the past 15 years have decried the condition of these notes, finding they contained unnecessary information and many inaccuracies — primarily because the note authors had, the American College of Physicians chimed in: “At present, it is far too easy to open a patient chart, read volumes of data, and find that no single person has stated what they believe is happening.”or best practice recommendations. In 2019, published a California hospitals-based study that showed the significant disconnect between the number and type of exams that a group of nine emergency department trainees recorded as having completed and the actual number and type of exams that 12 observers witnessed either via direct audiovisual observation or by a review of the recorded observation. The agreement between what was actually recorded and observed was barely 50%. The observers, however, jibed with each other 90% of the time. Contributing to the progress notes’ bloat factor is how the hospitals use them, namely for coding, billing, and quality reporting. These entries make them legal documents and therefore the justified recipient of all non-care patient information. This extra information often obfuscates the And it most likely negatively affects the person in the bed. “Poor notes negatively impact patient care,” wrote the authors of a new study conducted at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, and published in the— combining seasoned staff’s clinical experience with the nearly innate tech know-how of incoming juniors — that has continued to elude all.Refusing to accept that, Johns Hopkins’ Samuel Durso, MD, MBA, executive vice chair, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, and director, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, decided on a new tack for his study. He said in a recent interview that he had had enough of seeing poorly devised notes.The Durso team took a different path for getting seasoned hospitalists to create readable, usable patient progress notes. They created a rubric with 15 gradable items, devised an educational intervention that was used when necessary, and included a control group. The total number of hospitalist participants was 26. The participants were all about 40 years old and had worked in hospital medicine for an average of about 9 years. The study team rated 156 of the study participants’ notes, taken 6 months prior to the educational instruction and after. The creation of the rubric was based on a literature review, 100 progress notes, the team’s assessment of existing admissions notes, and peer feedback. The study results showed that progress-note quality improved if hospital physicians were guided via the rubric.Hospital physicians do not deliberately create poor progress notes, Durso said. “It’s not because people are stupid or lazy; it’s because hospital systems are set up a certain way,” he said. As for what happens next, Durso said he is thinking about ways to maintain gains from the study results by “baking” them into the actual workday. “We don’t have that answer yet,” he said. “It takes people to do this and train them.” One option could be to use Johns Hopkins’ existing artificial intelligence software to incorporate note quality. He addressed the size of his study. “We didn’t need this study to tell us we have a problem,” he said. His team wanted to see if it could design a plan that was workable in the Johns Hopkins environment “to give us an indication of whether the teaching method is effective.” The study also provided the methodology some credibility. “At least what we have shown is we can train people to improve their notes, with adjudication between observers.”Comments on Medscape are moderated and should be professional in tone and on topic. You must declare any conflicts of interest related to your comments and responses. Please see our
EHR Electronic Health Record (EHR) Hospitals Hospital Medicine Hospitalists
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Current mental health support systems often fail to meet men's needs.Current mental health support systems often fail to meet men's needs.
Read more »
Ok, How Often Should You *Really* Be Replacing These Common Kitchen Tools?A market-leader in the wellness space for over a decade, Well+Good is a digital publication and community dedicated to informing and empowering you to live a well life, inside and out.
Read more »
Trump is justifying his LA crackdown with a familiar – and often baselessA large part of President Donald Trump’s justification for the extraordinary mobilization of the National Guard and Marines in Los Angeles is the idea that violent demonstrators are “paid.”
Read more »
The body often heals much faster than the mind.Your only chance of living the life you most want to live is to be the person, partner, and parent you most want to be.
Read more »
When parenting isn’t a choice, children often carry the emotional cost.Parenthood can be a burden when chosen by expectation, not desire. Learn how this affects parents and the emotional well-being of their kids.
Read more »
This Often Overlooked Nutrient Helps Balance Hormones & Lifts MoodAre you getting enough of this hormone-friendly nutrient?
Read more »