Dr Neil Skolnik hits the highlights of the Endocrine Society's new guidance on who needs a vitamin D supplement (and who doesn't) and why testing isn't recommended.
Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia; Associate Director, Department of Family Medicine, Abington Jefferson Health, Abington, Pennsylvania Serve on the advisory board for: AstraZeneca; Teva; Eli Lilly and Company; Boehringer Ingelheim; Sanofi; Sanofi Pasteur; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; Bayer Serve as a speaker or a member of a speakers bureau for: AstraZeneca; Boehringer Ingelheim; Eli Lilly and Company; GlaxoSmithKline Received income in an amount equal to or greater than $250 from: AstraZeneca; Teva; Eli Lilly and Company; Boehringer Ingelheim; Sanofi; Sanofi Pasteur; GlaxoSmithKline; Merck; Bayer .
The question of who and when to test for vitamin D, and when to prescribe vitamin D, comes up frequently. There have been a lot of studies, and many people I know have opinions about this, but I haven't seen a lot of clear, evidence-based guidance. This much-needed guideline provides guidance, though I'm not sure that everyone is going to be happy with the recommendations. That said, the Society did conduct a comprehensive assessment and systematic review of the evidence that was impressive and well done. For our discussion today, I will focus on the recommendations for nonpregnant adults. The assumption for all of the recommendations is that these are for individuals who are already getting the Institute of Medicine's recommended amount of vitamin D, which is 600 IU daily for those 50-70 years of age and 800 IU daily for those above 80 years. For adults aged 18-74 years, who do not have prediabetes, the guidelines suggest against routinely testing for vitamin D deficiency and recommend against routine supplementation. For the older part of this cohort, adults aged 50-74 years, there is abundant randomized trial evidence showing little to no significant differences with vitamin D supplementation on outcomes of fracture, cancer, cardiovascular disease,, or mortality. While supplementation is safe, there does not appear to be any benefit to routine supplementation or testing. It is important to note that the trials were done in populations that were meeting the daily recommended intake of vitamin D and who did not have low vitamin D levels at baseline, so individuals who may not be meeting the recommended daily intake though their diet or through sun exposure may consider vitamin D supplementation. For adults with prediabetes, vitamin D supplementation is recommended to reduce the risk for progression from prediabetes to diabetes. This is about 1 in 3 adults in the United States. A number of trials have looked at vitamin D supplementation for adults with prediabetes in addition to lifestyle modification . Vitamin D decreases the risk for progression from prediabetes to diabetes by approximately 10%-15%. The effect may be greater in those who are over age 60 and who have lower initial vitamin D levels. Vitamin D in older adults has a separate recommendation. In this age group, low vitamin D levels are common, with up to 20% of older adults having low vitamin D levels. The guidelines suggest against testing vitamin D in adults aged 75 or over and recommend empiric vitamin D supplementation for all adults aged 75 or older. While observational studies have shown a relationship between low vitamin D levels in this age group and adverse outcomes, including falls, fractures, and, evidence from randomized placebo-controlled trials of vitamin D supplementation have been inconsistent in regard to benefit. That said, a meta-analysis has shown that vitamin D supplementation lowers mortality compared with placebo, with a relative risk of 0.96 . There was no difference in effect according to setting , vitamin D dosage, or baseline vitamin D level. There appeared to be a benefit of low-dose vitamin D supplementation on fall risk, with possibly greater fall risk when high-dose supplementation was used. No significant effect on fracture rate was seen with vitamin D supplementation alone, although there was a decrease in fractures when vitamin D was combined with calcium. In these studies, the median dose of calcium was 1000 mg per day. Based on the probability of a"slight decrease in all-cause mortality" and its safety, as well as possible benefit to decrease falls, the recommendation is for supplementation for all adults aged 75 or older. Since there was not a consistent difference by vitamin D level, testing is not necessary. Let's now discuss dosage. The guidelines recommend daily lower-dose vitamin D over nondaily higher-dose vitamin D. Unfortunately, the guideline does not specify a specific dose of vitamin D. The supplementation dose used in trials of adults aged 75 or older ranged from 400 to 3333 IU daily, with an average dose of 900 IU daily, so it seems to me that a dose of 1000-2000 IU daily is a reasonable choice for older adults. In the prediabetes trials, a higher average dose was used, with a mean of 3500 IU daily, so a higher dose might make sense in this group. I know that this is an area where a lot of clinicians have a lot of experience and opinions. I'm interested in yours, how you approach this, and what you think is correct. Please leave your thoughts in the comments section. Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of WebMD or Medscape.
Borderline Diabetes Vitamins Osteoporosis Osteoporotic Diagnostics And Medical Device Diagnostics And Medical Devices Biomedical Devices Diagnostic Devices Prognosis Vitamin D Deficiency Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Type Ii Type 2 Diabetes Type 2 DM T2DM T2D Elderly/Concerns Of Older Adults Elderly Fractures Pennsylvania Fellowship Fellows Residency
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Vitamin B6: New compound could delay degradationA low vitamin B6 level has negative effects on brain performance. A research team from Würzburg University Medicine has now found a way to delay the degradation of the vitamin.
Read more »
Vitamin May Extend Lifespan, New Research SuggestsVitamin D extended the lifespan of killifish, a recent study found, suggesting the vitamin could have similar effects in humans.
Read more »
Vitamin B6: New compound delays degradationA low vitamin B6 level has negative effects on brain performance. A research team has now found a way to delay the degradation of the vitamin.
Read more »
The 10 Best Vitamin C Serums, According to Testing and DermatologistsOur writer tested the best vitamin C serums, including SkinCeuticals and CeraVe, and asked experts for their top picks for sensitive, oily, and acne-prone skin.
Read more »
New Study Links Parkinson's Disease to Certain Vitamin DeficienciesDigital destination for sophisticated men & women. Live your best life with expert tips and news on health, food, sex, relationships, fashion and lifestyle.
Read more »
Recommendations for Verifying HDR Subjective Testing Workflows: HDR Subjective Testing WorkflowIn this paper, researchers present a set of recommendations for conformance testing of High Dynamic Range displays and content.
Read more »