A Helena judge has allowed the wolf hunting and trapping regulations the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted earlier this year to stand, despite flagging “serious concerns” about the state’s ability to accurately estimate Montana’s wolf population.
Ex-aide says Netanyahu tasked him with making a plan to evade responsibility for Oct. 7 attackAn American Dream at risk: What happens to a small Nebraska town when 3,200 workers lose their jobsEx-CIA director John Brennan wants 'favored' Trump judge kept away from Justice Department inquiryChiefs’ move to Kansas leaves Missouri fans heartbrokenBarry Manilow has early-stage lung cancer and will undergo surgeryAP Entertainment WireBaltimore cyclist finds joy in collecting lost hubcaps and stringing them into artSouthern California man gets an unwanted housemate: A black bear in his crawl spaceSome people tape their mouths shut at night.
Doctors wish they wouldn'tHere’s what dermatologists are saying about your skin care routine: Keep it simpleDoctor's orders? ‘Belly laugh at least two to five days a week'What's an atmospheric river? AP explains the weather phenomenonSome people tape their mouths shut at night. Doctors wish they wouldn'tIt's not too late to turn the page and start reading again in 2026Waymos blocked roads and caused chaos during San Francisco power outageAyesha Curry shares her recipe for a 'So This Is Christmas Cocktail'White House rebuffs Catholic bishops' appeal for a Christmas pause in immigration enforcementImpresionantes fotos de animales y naturaleza captadas por fotoperiodistas de la AP en 2025The killing of a general in Moscow follows a series of assassinations Russia blames on UkraineThe Afternoon WireCloudy future for bourbon has Jim Beam closing Kentucky distillery for a yearTrump warns Maduro against playing 'tough' as US escalates pressure campaign on VenezuelaSteelers WR DK Metcalf suspended 2 games following altercation with fan in DetroitSinger-songwriter Chris Rea, known for 'Driving Home for Christmas,' dies at 74Raccoon goes on drunken rampage in Virginia liquor store and passes out on bathroom floorA humpback whale briefly swallows kayaker in Chilean Patagonia — and it's all captured on cameraAn elephant family smashed pumpkins at the Oregon Zoo. But this baby just wanted to play ballIt's not too late to turn the page and start reading again in 2026You finally got a doctor's appointment. Here's how to get the most out of itDemocrats are becoming a force in traditionally conservative The VillagesUS regulators approve Wegovy pill for weight lossAddiction-stricken community struggles to keep a syringe program going after Trump's orderMontana medical board revokes cancer doctor's license after accusations of harming patientsCreating realistic deepfakes is getting easier than ever. Fighting back may take even more AIDried cherry scones are a simple treat for the post-holiday breakfast tableGaza's tiny Christian community tries to capture the holiday spirit during the ceasefireTrump anuncia planes para un nuevo"acorazado" de la Armada como parte de una"Flota Dorada"A Helena judge has allowed the wolf hunting and trapping regulations the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission adopted earlier this year to stand, despite flagging “serious concerns” about the state’s ability to accurately estimate Montana’s wolf population., District Court Judge Christopher Abbott wrote that leaving the 2025-2026 hunting and trapping regulations in place while he considers an underlying lawsuit will not “push wolf populations to an unsustainable level.”aimed at driving wolf numbers down. Earlier this year, the environmental groups added new claims to their lawsuit and asked the court to stop the 2025-2026 regulations from taking effect. The groups argued that a record-high wolf hunting and trapping quota of 458 wolves, paired with the potential for another 100 wolves to be killed for preying on livestock or otherwise getting into conflict with humans, would push the state’s wolf population “toward long-term decline and irreparable harm.” According to the state’s population estimates — figures that the environmental groups dispute — there are approximately 1,100 wolves across the state. In a Dec. 19 press release about the decision, Connie Poten with Footloose Montana described the ruling as a “severe setback,” but argued that the “resulting slaughter will only strengthen our ongoing case for the protection of this vital species.”“The fight for wolves is deep and broad, based in science, connection, humaneness and necessity. Wolves will not die in vain,” Poten said. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks declined to comment on the order, citing the ongoing litigation. Montana Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition, nonprofit groups that backed the state’s position in the litigation, could not be reached for comment on the order by publication time Monday afternoon. The order comes more than a month after a two-hour hearing on the request for an injunction, and about three weeks after the trapping season opened across the majority of the state. The trapping season is set to close no later than March 15, 2026. During the Nov. 14 hearing at the Lewis and Clark County courthouse, Alexander Scolavino argued on behalf of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks and the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission that hunters, trappers and wildlife managers won’t come close to killing 558 wolves this season. Scolavino added that the highest number shot or trapped in a single season was 350 wolves in 2020 — well shy of the 458-wolf quota the commission, the governor-appointed board that sets hunting seasons for game species and furbearers, Abbott agreed with Scolavino’s argument, writing in his order that it’s unlikely that hunters and trappers will “achieve anything near the quota established by the commission.” To reinforce his claim, he noted that hunters and trappers have not killed 334 wolves — the quota commissioners adopted for the 2024-2025 season — in any of the past five seasons. “In short, nothing suggests that the 2025/2026 season is likely to push wolf populations to an unsustainable level or cause them irreparable injury,” he concluded. Abbott seemed to suggest that livestock-oriented conflicts are waning and that it’s unlikely that the state will authorize the killing of 100 “conflict” wolves. He noted that livestock depredations dropped from “a high of 233 in 2009 to 100 per year or less today.” On other issues — namely the Constitutional environmental rights asserted by the plaintiffs and the reliability of the state’s wolf population-estimation model — Abbott appeared to side with the plaintiffs. Those issues remain unresolved in the Abbott wrote that the plaintiffs “are likely to show that a sustainable wolf population in Montana forms part of the ‘environmental life support system’ of the state.” The environmental groups had argued in their filings that the existing wolf-management framework “will deplete and degrade Montana’s wolf population,” running afoul of the state’s duty to “preserve the right to a clean and healthful environment.” In his order, Abbott incorporated material from the plaintiffs’ filings regarding the economic and ecological benefits of wolves, including “the suppression of overabundant elk, deer and coyote populations,” “restoring vegetation that aids water quality, songbirds and insect pollinators,” and “generating income and jobs” by contributing to the wildlife-watching economy anchored by Yellowstone National Park. Abbott also expressed “serious concerns” about the way the state estimates wolf numbers — a model that relies, among other things, on wolf sightings reported by elk hunters — but ultimately concluded that the court is currently “unequipped” to referee “the palace intrigues of academia” in the wildlife population-modeling arena. In the press release about the decision, the environmental groups described these pieces of Abbott’s order as “serious and valid questions” that the court must still address., joined an outfitter from Gallatin County and the Outdoor Heritage Coalition to push the state to loosen regulations by, for example, lengthening the trapping season and expanding the tools hunters or trappers can use to pursue and kill wolves. The plaintiffs in that lawsuit argue that liberalizing the hunting and trapping season would reaffirm the “opportunity to harvest wild fish and wild game animals enshrined in the Montana Constitution,” and bring the state into alignment with a, 83 wolves have been shot or trapped as of Dec. 22. The department closed the two wolf management units closest to Yellowstone National Park to further hunting and trapping earlier this year after three wolves were killed in each of those units.
Christopher Abbott Montana Zoology Lawsuits General News Legal Proceedings Deer WY State Wire MT State Wire Wyoming Local News For Apple News Partner Alexander Scolavino U.S. News Connie Poten Paul Fielder Shannon Maness U.S. News
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
2025 FCS Playoffs Semifinal Recap: Illinois State, Montana State Advance To NashvilleWe offer our takeaways and thoughts on both semifinal games of the 2025 FCS Playoffs, which saw Illinois State and Montana State advance to Nashville for the 2026 FCS National Championship
Read more »
The Most-Read Vogue Business Stories of 2025Labubus, AI slop, exciting M&A deals and more designer debuts than ever before. Here’s what Vogue Business readers clicked on this year.
Read more »
Gold Hits Record High as 2025 Gains Exceed Bitcoin’s Total Market Cap by 7xThe precious yellow metal has hit a new all-time high while its digital equivalent still lags a long way behind.
Read more »
2025’s Biggest Surprise: The Lack of Market Impact from Economic Policy and DataMarket Analysis by covering: Gold Spot US Dollar, Silver Spot US Dollar, S&P 500. Read 's Market Analysis on Investing.com
Read more »
New Scientist changed the UK's freedom of information laws in 2025By requesting copies of the then-UK technology secretary's ChatGPT logs, New Scientist set a precedent for how freedom of information laws apply to chatbot interactions, helping to hold governments to account
Read more »
ChatGPT’s year-end recap offers a snapshot of how you used it in 2025Tech Product Reviews, How To, Best Ofs, deals and Advice
Read more »