Humans Can Detect Buried Objects Without Touching Them, Study Finds

United States News News

Humans Can Detect Buried Objects Without Touching Them, Study Finds
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 Gizmodo
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 120 sec. here
  • 3 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 51%
  • Publisher: 51%

We apparently have more in common with some shorebirds than we previously thought.

Recent research suggests that humans have a surprising ability—we can sometimes feel a physical object before making contact with it.published this past October in the journal IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, researchers found that, similarly to some shorebirds, we have a form of “remote touch.

” Simply put, when you move your hand through granular materials like sand, you can feel an object buried in said material before touching it directly. “It’s the first time that remote touch has been studied in humans and it changes our conception of the perceptual world in living beings, including humans,” Elisabetta Versace, co-author of the study and lead of the Prepared Minds Lab at Queen Mary University of London, said in a universityVersace and her colleagues asked 12 study participants to gently move their fingers through sand to find a hidden cube before touching it. This approach revealed that humans have remote touch comparable to that of some shorebirds, like sandpipers and plovers—even though we don’t have their specialized beak structures that allow for their sense.This is the first time researchers have documented this tactile skill in humans. So how do we do it? The team found that human hands are sensitive enough to identify buried objects by feeling tiny displacements in the sand around them. In fact, the participants were 70.7% precise within the expected detectable range. The researchers also tested the remote touchability of a robotic tactile sensor . While on average, the robot could find objects from slightly farther distances, it often yielded false positives and had only 40% overall precision. Both humans and the robot achieved close to the maximum sensitivity researchers had predicted. In other words, robots can take our jobs, but we can still find things buried in the sand with slightly more precision.Remote touch in humans is surprising but probably not a very useful skill on its own. However, “the discovery opens possibilities for designing tools and assistive technologies that extend human tactile perception,” explained Zhengqi Chen, a co-author of the study and PhD student of the Advanced Robotics Lab at Queen Mary University of London. “These insights could inform the development of advanced robots capable of delicate operations, for example locating archaeological artifacts without damage, or exploring sandy or granular terrains such as Martian soil or ocean floors,” he added. “More broadly, this research paves the way for touch-based systems that make hidden or hazardous exploration safer, smarter, and more effective.”7:00 amLeaked Amazon Plans Say Robots Will Help It Avoid Hiring 600,000 Workers

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

Gizmodo /  🏆 556. in US

 

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Missing social media influencer Stefanie Pieper found dead in forest, buried by ex: reportMissing social media influencer Stefanie Pieper found dead in forest, buried by ex: reportMissing Austrian beauty influencer Stefanie Pieper has reportedly been found dead in a Slovenian forest after her ex-boyfriend allegedly led law enforcement to where he buried her remains.
Read more »

Today's biggest science news: X-class solar flares | Chernobyl fungus | Modern humans interbred with 'hobbits'Today's biggest science news: X-class solar flares | Chernobyl fungus | Modern humans interbred with 'hobbits'Alexander McNamara is the Editor-in-Chief at Live Science, and has more than 15 years’ experience in publishing at digital titles. In 2024 he was shortlisted for Editor of the Year at the Association of British Science Writers awards for his work at Live Science. He has previously worked at New Scientist and BBC Science Focus.
Read more »

Why IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is still hiring humans in the AI eraWhy IBM CEO Arvind Krishna is still hiring humans in the AI eraIBM CEO Arvind Krishna on Watson, the AI bubble, and why he’s hiring college grads.
Read more »

From Cyber Week to Christmas: How automation and humans team up for faster deliveriesFrom Cyber Week to Christmas: How automation and humans team up for faster deliveriesDan is a graduate of Cal State Fullerton, which at the time was one of the top broadcasting programs in the country.
Read more »

Study Warns of Major Toll ‘Chronic Stress’ Could Be Taking On HumansStudy Warns of Major Toll ‘Chronic Stress’ Could Be Taking On HumansResearchers say rapid tech and environmental changes have outpaced human evolution to our mental and physical detriment.
Read more »

Done With Dashboards: Why Security Needs Outcome-Driven MetricsDone With Dashboards: Why Security Needs Outcome-Driven MetricsSuccess shouldn’t be measured by how much we detect, but by how effectively we act.
Read more »



Render Time: 2026-04-01 09:06:01