Success shouldn’t be measured by how much we detect, but by how effectively we act.
report being overwhelmed by the "increasing volume of threats detected from a growing number of tools on an increasing number of assets." That statistic captures what I’ve seen play out across two decades of enterprise security.
We’re spending record amounts on security information and event management , observability and identity tools. Breach dwell times have barely improved. Visibility has become a comfort blanket. Teams are drowning in telemetry, yet can’t prove that any of it translates to safety. So how do we prove what we're doing works?Most security programs were built on the assumption that better visibility equals better protection. That assumption doesn't hold anymore. Every day, analysts in the average security operations center triage thousands of alerts. They chase false positives, reclassify incidents and escalate a tiny fraction for action. The rest pile up in a backlog that no one has time to touch. When real incidents hit, response teams stitch together data from dozens of systems. By the time they understand what happened, damage is done. This isn’t a tooling problem. It is a measurement issue. We’ve been measuring activity, not outcomes. Executives view graphs filled with detection events, blocked attacks and policy violations. Yet when boards ask, “Are we safer this quarter?” most CISOs can’t answer with confidence. They can show effort. They can’t show results.Why are outcomes so hard to measure? Because remediation is completely fragmented. Identity and access management , privileged access management , governance and IT service management each control part of the workflow. Connecting them takes a year and incurs a significant cost in integration projects. This fragmentation creates what I call an "integration tax.” Every hand-off between systems adds latency. Each delay gives attackers more time to exploit weaknesses. CISA’s red team exercise in 2023,Orphaned accounts multiply quietly. Stale entitlements pile up. Non-human identities proliferate often unchecked. Many detection tools surface these issues, but stop short of ownership. No one “owns” the problem when de-provisioning has to cross IAM, HR and legacy systems. This pattern repeats: we detect and discuss, but we rarely close the loop. as an approach that creates situational awareness to manage operational risk. That's exactly how security operations should evolve. An ODM connects three things: a specific observation, an automated response and a business-aligned measure of impact. Instead of counting alerts, teams measure risk reduction over time. This shifts the conversation from activity to accountability. Success shouldn’t be measured by how much we detect, but by how effectively we act. The value of an ODM approach lies in its traceability. Every detection triggers an action, every action maps to a control and every control ties to a quantifiable outcome, such as reduced financial exposure or fewer audit hours. Here's a practical example: Rather than reporting "number of privileged access violations detected," track "percentage of privileged sessions automatically revoked within five minutes." That metric tells the board something useful. It shows control, not curiosity.When evaluating new platforms, I recommend asking these five ODM-related questions:2. Can each detection tie to an automated action across IAM, ITSM or conditional access systems?4. Can you pilot a new metric end-to-end within 30 days?If you're hearing "no," you're likely buying more visibility, not better outcomes.Here's what vendors miss: CISOs aren't buying products. They're buying defensible decisions. The real calculus behind every enterprise deal is career risk. I’ve sat in those rooms. When a board asks, “Why did you approve this tool?” the CISO needs an answer that survives scrutiny. If the project fails, can they show that the decision was reasonable and data-driven? Outcome-driven metrics help provide that defensibility. They let leaders demonstrate that controls are not just deployed but effective. When I talk with peers, exhaustion from proving value is the complaint I hear most often. A measurable audit trail helps show progress instead of promises.We are entering a period where accountability will define competitive advantage. Boards, insurers and regulators all want quantifiable evidence of risk reduction. Vague claims of “AI-enhanced detection” or “360-degree visibility” no longer suffice. For identity-centric security, this means enabling teams to observe, correlate and remediate within one continuous loop—but that loop is only as strong as its foundation. Actual results can only be achieved when data is unified across all identity silos and systems within the enterprise. Without this layer, which continuously unifies, reconciles and normalizes identities, ODMs will be built on inconsistent signals and, more importantly, incomplete context. The real work now is in building systems that let ODMs run smoothly across hybrid and multicloud setups without adding operational drag. That’s where the next phase of innovation must focus.For CISOs: Stop accepting “visibility-only” narratives. Demand ODM pilots before procurement. Ask vendors to prove measurable risk reduction within 90 days. For boards: Fund programs that quantify risk removed per dollar spent rather than total alerts processed. The right questions are capable of changing culture. For vendors: Open your APIs. Expose your logic. Build extensible rule engines. If your product can’t integrate into an ODM workflow, it will become shelfware. An ODM approach can transform security from perpetual firefight to managed discipline. We owe our teams proof that what we build makes them safer.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Heisman Trophy Rankings After Rivalry Week: Has Diego Pavia Done Enough?With college football’s rivalry week in the rearview, here’s where we currently stand in the race for the Heisman Trophy.
Read more »
Gentrification is good, actuallyWhy Dallas can and must avoid New York City’s original sin.
Read more »
Everything to Know from Dolphins' Week 13 Win vs. SaintsThe Dolphins had a rough second half but got the job done.
Read more »
Uncommon Knowledge: Trump Closes Venezuelan Airspace, but Not NATO AirspaceWhy is the president talking tough with Maduro while his allies tiptoe around Putin?
Read more »
The Prada-Versace Deal Is Done. What Now?After months of awaiting regulatory approval, Prada is now the owner of Versace. Much has happened since the sale was announced in April. What can we expect?
Read more »
Driving You Crazy: When will the construction on Old Hampden in Englewood be done?Jayson Luber is a Denver7 Traffic Anchor, Reporter, and Forecaster.
Read more »