A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against President Donald Trump's administration's plan to pause federal funding while conducting a broad ideological review of programs. The decision, made in response to concerns about the legality and potential chaos caused by the funding freeze, applies to existing programs and lasts until Monday afternoon.
A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked President Donald Trump's administration's attempt to pause federal funding while conducting a sweeping ideological review to dismantle progressive initiatives. The Trump administration's plan triggered panic and confusion across the U.S. government, setting the stage for a constitutional showdown over the control of taxpayer money. The order from U.S. District Judge Loren L. AliKhan came minutes before the funding freeze was set to take effect.
It remains in place until Monday afternoon and applies only to existing programs. Administration officials defended the decision to halt loans and grants, a crucial lifeline for local governments, schools, and nonprofit organizations nationwide, stating it was necessary to ensure spending aligned with Trump's recent flurry of executive orders. These orders encompass goals like boosting fossil fuel production, rolling back protections for transgender individuals, and ending diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. However, the administration's vaguely worded memo from the Office of Management and Budget, coupled with incomplete answers from the White House throughout the day, left lawmakers, public officials, and ordinary Americans struggling to comprehend which programs would be affected by the pause. Even temporary funding interruptions could result in layoffs or delays in vital public services. 'This sort of came out of the blue,' said David Smith, spokesperson for the Shawnee Mission School District in Kansas, one of countless districts relying on federal funding. Now, they're grappling to understand its implications 'based on zero information.' Trump administration officials asserted that programs directly assisting Americans, such as Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, student loans, and food stamps, would not be impacted. They further justified the funding pause, claiming Trump was fulfilling his pledge to shake up Washington if re-elected for a second term. Yet, the repercussions were being felt far beyond the nation's capital. Organizations like Meals on Wheels, which receives federal funding to deliver meals to the elderly, expressed concerns about potential disruptions. 'The lack of clarity and uncertainty right now is creating chaos,' said spokeswoman Jenny Young, adding that 'seniors may panic not knowing where their next meals will come from.' The National Science Foundation postponed grant application review panels scheduled for this week. Officials in Prichard, Alabama, feared they would lose infrastructure funding needed to repair their leaking drinking water system. Even Republican leaders in Louisiana sought 'clarity' to ensure nothing jeopardized the state's financial stability. 'Trump's actions would wreak havoc in red and blue communities everywhere,' stated Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee. 'We are talking about our small towns, our cities, our school districts.' The full scope of the administration's review was laid out in a 51-page spreadsheet sent to federal agencies and viewed by The Associated Press. Each entry represented a distinct government initiative, ranging from pool safety to tribal workforce development to special education. Officials were instructed to answer a series of yes or no questions for every item, including 'does this program promote gender ideology?' or 'does this program promote or support in any way abortion?' Responses were due by February 7th. Trillions of dollars are potentially under scrutiny. Grants that have been awarded but not yet spent are also expected to be halted if they might violate one of Trump's executive orders. 'The use of Federal resources to advance Marxist equity, transgenderism, and green new deal social engineering policies is a waste of taxpayer dollars that does not improve the day-to-day lives of those we serve,' wrote Matthew Vaeth, the acting director of the Office of Management and Budget, in a memo distributed Monday. Vaeth asserted that 'each agency must complete a comprehensive analysis of all of their Federal financial assistance programs to identify programs, projects, and activities that may be implicated by any of the President's executive orders.' He also stated that the pause should be implemented 'to the extent permissible under applicable law.' The pause on grants and loans was scheduled to take effect at 5 p.m. ET, just one day after agencies received notification of the decision. Democrats condemned the Trump administration's decision, labeling it capricious and illegal. They argued that the president lacked the authority to unilaterally halt spending approved by Congress. New York Attorney General Letitia James planned to petition a Manhattan federal court to block the funding pause. 'There is no question this policy is reckless, dangerous, illegal and unconstitutional,' she declared. Separately, a coalition of nonprofit organizations filed a lawsuit in Washington, contending that the funding pause lacks any legal basis or even a minimal justification
Trump Administration Federal Funding Ideological Review Constitutional Clash Grants Loans Nonprofit Organizations Congress
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge has issued an administrative stay, pausing the start date of the Trump administration’s federal funding freeze until Monday. The freeze was…
Read more »
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump's Order to Freeze Federal GrantsA federal judge has issued a temporary injunction against President Trump's directive to freeze federal grants, protecting funding for existing programs until at least Monday. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of non-profit, healthcare, and small business advocacy groups who argued the freeze order was unlawful and would harm grant recipients.
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked a push from President Donald Trump to pause federal funding while his administration conducts an across-the-board
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked a push from President Donald Trump to pause federal funding while his administration conducts an across-the-board
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge has temporarily blocked a Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loans that could total trillions of dollars.
Read more »
Trump’s federal funding freeze temporarily blocked by federal judge before it beganThe administrative stay pauses the freeze until Monday.
Read more »