A federal judge in Washington, D.C. has temporarily blocked the Bureau of Prisons from transferring three transgender women to men's facilities and terminating their hormone therapy. The judge ruled that the move would jeopardize their safety and expose them to psychological harm, siding with plaintiffs' attorneys who argued that the Trump administration's executive order violates their constitutional rights.
Moving the women to a men's prison would jeopardize their safety and expose them to psychological harm, plaintiffs' attorneys argued.A federal judge agreed Tuesday to temporarily block prison officials from transferring three incarcerated transgender women to men’s facilities and terminating their access to hormone therapy under an executive order signed byU.
S. District Judge Royce Lamberth in Washington, D.C., granted the inmates' request for a temporary restraining order. He issued a written ruling several hours after a hearing where a plaintiffs' attorney argued that Trump's order discriminates against transgender people and violates their constitutional rights.The judge is presiding over a lawsuit filed on behalf of three transgender women who were housed in women's facilities before Trump signed the order on Jan. 20, his first day back in theOn Jan. 26, a federal judge in Boston issued a restraining order in a separate challenge to the same executive order. That order was limited to one transgender woman in a woman's prison.Trump's order requires the federal Bureau of Prisons to ensure that “males are not detained in women’s prisons.” It also requires the bureau to revise its medical care policies so that federal funds aren't spent “for the purpose of conforming an inmate’s appearance to that of the opposite sex."Moving the women to a men's prison would jeopardize their safety and expose them to psychological harm, plaintiffs' attorneys argued. Trump's order would disrupt the plaintiffs' access to hormone therapy for their gender dysphoria, the distress that a person may feel because their assigned gender and gender identity don’t match. The medical condition has been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts. Lamberth noted that there are only about 16 transgender women housed in female penitentiaries, including the three plaintiffs who sued in Washington. The judge concluded that “the public interest in seeing the plaintiffs relocated immediately to male facilities is slight at best.” “Moreover, the balance of the equities and the public interest favor the plaintiffs,” wrote Lamberth, a senior judge who was nominated by then-President Ronald Reagan in 1987. The plaintiffs, who are identified by pseudonyms in court filings, are represented by attorneys from the San Francisco-based National Center for Lesbian Rights and Boston-based GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders, also known as GLAD Law. The plaintiffs were housed in women’s units for months or years until January, when they were removed from the general population of women’s prisons and segregated with other transgender women to await transfers to men’s facilities. “They were terrified at the prospect of these transfers given the serious risk of violence and sexual assault that they face in these men's facilities,” GLAD attorney Jennifer Levi told the judge. Plaintiffs' lawyers argued that Trump's order violates their clients' constitutional rights to equal protection of laws and to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. “There is no way to keep these women safe outside of a women's prison.” Levi said. “We are just asking this court to maintain the status quo.” Robinson said the plaintiffs haven't been denied any medical care since Trump signed the order. The Bureau of Prisons hasn't decided where to transfer them yet, he added.Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., asked Rep. Jasmine Crockett, D-Texas, if she "want to take this outside" during an argument while debating transgender rights in a House Oversight hearing.
TRANSGENDER RIGHTS PRISON SYSTEM EXECUTIVE ORDER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HUMAN RIGHTS
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge has issued an administrative stay, pausing the start date of the Trump administration’s federal funding freeze until Monday. The freeze was…
Read more »
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump's Order to Freeze Federal GrantsA federal judge has issued a temporary injunction against President Trump's directive to freeze federal grants, protecting funding for existing programs until at least Monday. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of non-profit, healthcare, and small business advocacy groups who argued the freeze order was unlawful and would harm grant recipients.
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked a push from President Donald Trump to pause federal funding while his administration conducts an across-the-board
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked a push from President Donald Trump to pause federal funding while his administration conducts an across-the-board
Read more »
Federal judge temporarily blocks Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loansA federal judge has temporarily blocked a Trump administration freeze on federal grants and loans that could total trillions of dollars.
Read more »
Trump’s federal funding freeze temporarily blocked by federal judge before it beganThe administrative stay pauses the freeze until Monday.
Read more »