A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to restore public access to health-related webpages and datasets that were removed following an executive order promoting the use of 'sex' instead of 'gender'. The judge ruled that the removal of these resources harms doctors and, ultimately, patients seeking care.
A federal judge on Tuesday ordered government agencies to restore public access to health-related webpages and datasets that they removed to comply with an executive order by President Donald Trump . U.S. District Judge John Bates in Washington agreed to issue a temporary restraining order requested by the Doctors for America advocacy group.
The judge instructed the government to restore access to several webpages and datasets that the group identified as missing from websites and to identify others that also were taken down “without adequate notice or reasoned explanation.” Trump signed an order his first day back in the White House for agencies to use the term “sex” and not 'gender' in federal policies and documents. In response, the Office of Personnel Management's acting director required agency heads to eliminate any programs and take down any websites that promote “gender ideology.” Doctors for America, represented by the Public Citizen Litigation Group, sued OPM, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services. The nonprofit group cited the executive order's adverse impact on two of its members: a Chicago clinic doctor who would have consulted CDC resources to address a recent chlamydia outbreak in a high school and a Yale School of Medicine doctor who relies on CDC resources about contraceptives and sexually transmitted infections. “These doctors’ time and effort are valuable, scarce resources, and being forced to spend them elsewhere makes their jobs harder and their treatment less effective,” the judge wrote. The case is among dozens of lawsuits challenging executive orders that Trump, a Republican, issued within hours of his second inauguration. The scrubbed material includes reports on HIV prevention, a CDC webpage for providing clinicians with guidance on reproductive health care and an FDA study on “sex differences in the clinical evaluation of medical products.” Removing important information from the CDC and FDA websites is delaying patient care, hampering research and hindering doctors' ability to communicate with patients, the plaintiffs' attorneys argued in a court filing. “The agencies’ actions create a dangerous gap in the scientific data available to monitor and respond to disease outbreaks, halt or hamper key health research, and deprive physicians of resources that impact clinical practice,” they wrote. During a hearing Monday, the judge asked plaintiffs' attorney Zachary Shelley if the removal of the online material harms the public. Shelley said the doctors' interests align with their patients. The judge concluded that the harm in this case ultimately trickles down to “everyday Americans” seeking doctors' care. “If those doctors cannot provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions,” Bates wrote. Doctors for America is a not-for-profit group representing more than 27,000 physicians and medical trainees. It was born from an earlier organization that pushed for health reform and supported Barack Obama, a Democrat, when he was running for president
DONALD TRUMP EXECUTIVE ORDER HEALTHCARE CDC FDA DOCTORS FOR AMERICA GENDER SEX
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal Judge Orders Trump Administration to Restore Frozen Federal FundsA federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the Trump administration improperly froze federal funds and must immediately restore them. The decision came in response to a lawsuit filed by attorneys general from 22 states and the District of Columbia. The judge cited the freeze's likely unconstitutionality and its harm to a vast portion of the country.
Read more »
Federal Judge Orders Trump Administration to Unfreeze Federal FundsA federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the Trump administration to immediately reinstate federal funding that was previously frozen. The judge ruled that the administration's actions violated a temporary restraining order and must be reversed.
Read more »
Federal Judge Orders Restoration of Health Agencies' Websites Removed Under Trump's Gender Ideology OrderA federal judge has ordered the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Food and Drug Administration to restore webpages and data that were removed in compliance with President Trump's executive order on gender ideology. The judge ruled that the agencies acted unlawfully when they stripped medical information from public-facing websites, citing the potential harm to patients, particularly underprivileged Americans, who rely on these resources for healthcare.
Read more »
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump's Order to Freeze Federal GrantsA federal judge has issued a temporary injunction against President Trump's directive to freeze federal grants, protecting funding for existing programs until at least Monday. The ruling came in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of non-profit, healthcare, and small business advocacy groups who argued the freeze order was unlawful and would harm grant recipients.
Read more »
Federal Judge Temporarily Blocks Trump's Order Freezing Federal AidA federal district judge temporarily halted President Trump's executive order freezing all federal financial assistance after the order was issued just one day prior. The order, which faced significant criticism, aimed to halt activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, including foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal. While Social Security, Medicare, and direct payments to individuals were not supposed to be affected, the vaguely worded memo caused widespread confusion and reports of people and organizations unable to access systems to receive their federal aid. The White House attempted to clarify exceptions throughout the day, but the damage was already done. Nonprofits that worked on healthcare and homelessness reported being unable to access websites to withdraw funds, and online portals to access Medicaid payments were temporarily down.
Read more »
Trump administration appeals federal judge's order to unfreeze federal fundsU.S. District Judge John McConnell issued a new motion ordering the Trump administration to unfreeze federal funds, after already doing so in January.
Read more »