The latest clash between California and President Donald Trump over abortion and gender-affirming care could soon leave doctors caught between state and federal law.
The Afternoon WireJustin Fairfax, who nearly became Virginia governor, killed his wife and himself, police saySenate rejects effort to halt arms sales to Israel, but most Democrats vote to block themNewly crowned UFC champ Carlos Ulberg says he lost title belt while celebrating the win: reportAllbirds, a former Wall Street darling fallen on hard times, looks to AI for its futureHot dogs and steaks and bacon, oh my! Meat raffles keep a beloved Midwest tradition aliveA small but growing movement wants you to put down your phone.
But first read thisDemocrats are becoming a force in traditionally conservative The VillagesSenate Republicans send Trump resolution to lift mining ban near Boundary Waters Canoe AreaA small but growing movement wants you to put down your phone. But first read thisWhy many Americans are turning to AI for health advice, according to recent pollsAI is a gold mine for spammers and scammers, but Google is using it as a tool to fight backPlastic garden gear can add microplastics to the soil. Here are some alternativesFamilias estadounidenses impugnan ley italiana que limita ciudadanía por ascendenciaIsrael and Lebanon agree to a 10-day ceasefire to start within hours, Trump saysJury finds that Ticketmaster and Live Nation had an anticompetitive monopoly over big concert venuesJustice Jackson chides Supreme Court conservatives over 'oblivious' pro-Trump emergency ordersLionel Messi accused of breaching $7 million contract by sitting out a Florida soccer friendlyAI-rendered Val Kilmer debuts in 'As Deep as the Grave' trailerAllbirds, a former Wall Street darling fallen on hard times, looks to AI for its futureHot dogs and steaks and bacon, oh my! Meat raffles keep a beloved Midwest tradition aliveA small but growing movement wants you to put down your phone. But first read thisDemocrats are becoming a force in traditionally conservative The VillagesSenate Republicans send Trump resolution to lift mining ban near Boundary Waters Canoe AreaA small but growing movement wants you to put down your phone. But first read thisWhy many Americans are turning to AI for health advice, according to recent pollsAI is a gold mine for spammers and scammers, but Google is using it as a tool to fight backPlastic garden gear can add microplastics to the soil. Here are some alternativesFamilias estadounidenses impugnan ley italiana que limita ciudadanía por ascendenciaReddit The latest clash between California and President Donald Trump over abortion and gender-affirming care could soon leave doctors caught between state and federal law. Under a bill that may soon pass the Legislature, California medical providers and affiliated businesses could face hefty state fines if they comply with a federal subpoena seeking abortion, gender-affirming or reproductive care information without first notifying the California attorney general, patients and providers. But delaying responding to the feds could put them at risk of violating federal law, and independent constitutional scholars say the pending law might not survive a legal challenge. The bill is in response to efforts the Trump administration and conservative states have undertaken to block or criminalize abortion services and care for transgender people., any medical provider or business served with any civil, criminal or regulatory inquiry, investigation, subpoena or summons seeking “legally protected health care activity” “shall not comply” unless the provider notifies the state attorney general as well as others involved in the care.of Los Angeles, said the impetus for the bill, in part, was a federal subpoena from the Trump administration to Children’s Hospital Los Angeles seeking medical records for youth transgender patients.“No one should have to fear that seeking lawful medical care in the state of California could put their privacy and their safety at risk,”AB 1930 at its first legislative hearing last week, despite the legal complexities and consequences for California’s patients, doctors, hospitals, insurers, tech companies and others. It passed on a party-line vote, according to the CalMatters The Los Angeles hospital was one of 20 medical providers that offered gender-affirming care for minors that received federal subpoenas seeking patients’ medical records. At the time, the U.S. Justice Department said the subpoenas were part of an investigation into “health care fraud” and “false statements.” Some of the families sued to fight the subpoenas. In January, Rady Children’s Hospital, which operates facilities in San Diego, Orange and Imperial counties, told CalMatters earlier this year that the U.S. Health and Human Services inspector general was investigating the hospital. The investigation preceded Rady’s decision toThe measure says that in order for a business or provider to release records, the entity making the legal demand must include an affidavit declaring that the investigation is not related to punishing providers for performing abortions, transgender care or other services protected under California law or that the investigation involves a possible California crime or is an inquiry into “professional discipline.” The recipient would be required to inform the attorney general’s office within seven days of receiving the legal demand. The attorney general would have an additional 30 days to review the matter before the recipient could comply with the order., would also mandate that the provider notify patients and providers whose records are being sought. Those who break the rules would face civil penalties of up to $15,000 per violation.California lawmakers have, in recent years, enacted more than a dozen laws designed to shield medical professionals from conservative states and the federal government on abortion and transgender health care. Democrats passed the laws after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade and other states began banning or criminalizing abortion.Legislative efforts to protect clinicians and patient medical records have expanded as the Trump administration has increasingly politicized other services like gender-affirming care for minors. California laws prohibit state law enforcement from extraditing medical professionals who may have violated another state’s laws on abortion or gender-affirming care. They also prohibit medical facilities from sharing patient information about those services with out-of-state law enforcement.the measure builds “on California’s existing protections to ensure that patients can access health care without fear that their personal information will be weaponized against them.” Various groups that oppose gender-affirming care are against the measure, as is the California Chamber of Commerce. In a letter to lawmakers, representatives for the state’s influential business lobby said CalChamber’s members appreciate lawmakers wanting to “help defend businesses facing subpoenas,” and they don’t oppose the bill out of “support for misuse of subpoena powers.” “However, we are concerned that AB 1930 will compel businesses to violate federal law in order to comply with state law,” they wrote.over the gender-reassignment surgery she received as a teen, said the bill would protect doctors from investigations into negligent care and make it harder for patients like her to subpoena for medical records. “This bill shields providers so they can keep chopping up bodies,”. “It wraps the doctors, the clinics, the gender industry in a legal blanket and says, ‘You are protected from accountability no matter who you harmed.’ There is no blanket for me.”Bill Essayli, a former Republican state lawmaker who oversees the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Los Angeles, said in a statement that Zbur’s measure would be unconstitutional. “Any effort by California to restrict the federal government’s lawful use of, or compliance with, subpoenas is unlawful and unenforceable under the Supremacy Clause,” Essayli said. Three independent constitutional scholars who CalMatters asked to review the bill suggested Essayli may have a point. Under that provision of the U.S. Constitution, states cannot pass laws that run counter to the federal government’s legal authority. “If there’s a conflict between federal law on the one hand, and state or local on the other, federal law wins out,” said Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of UC Berkeley School of Law. Chemerinsky and the other scholars said the measure is unlikely to run into the same legal problems that caused aCalifornia’s attempt to ban federal agents from wearing masks. The judge in the mask case ruled that the state had discriminated against the federal government since it exempted state police from the ban. This proposed measure doesn’t single out the federal government; the bill applies to any entity issuing subpoenas. Still, the scholars said forcing private health care providers and businesses not to respond to a subpoena on a federal deadline could be legally problematic. “It looks like the federal government could say you’re impeding their law enforcement,” said Leslie Gielow Jacobs, a law professor at University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law. “Is this impeding federal … objectives?” said Vikram David Amar, a law professor at the UC Davis School of Law. “If so, it would be invalid under Supremacy.” The California Attorney General’s Office responded to an interview request for Bonta with an unsigned written statement. “Bills aren’t final when they’re introduced and can change throughout the legislative process,” it read. “Our office will continue to have conversations with stakeholders regarding AB 1930 and will address concerns as appropriate and needed.”
Donald Trump Erwin Chemerinsky Gender Subpoenas Abortion General News LGBTQ United States Government United States Vikram David Amar Health Care Industry Politics Layla Jane Law Enforcement Rob Bonta Craig Pulsipher Leslie Gielow Jacobs U.S. News Constitutional Law Bill Essayli Health U.S. News
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump Renews Threats to Fire Fed Chair Powell Amidst Renovation ProbePresident Trump has once again threatened to dismiss Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell and continue a criminal investigation into the central bank. This comes as the Justice Department investigates cost overruns on a renovation project at the Fed's headquarters, a project Trump himself toured. The investigation and Trump's actions are creating complications for the potential confirmation of Trump's nominee to replace Powell, with one key senator vowing to block confirmation until the probe is resolved. A federal judge has previously questioned the Justice Department's motives, suggesting the investigation may be intended to harass Powell.
Read more »
Trump’s posting even more AI-generated Trump-Jesus fan artPlus: what Werner Herzog thinks of the Trump penguin meme.
Read more »
Donald Trump Jr.’s Fiancee Bettina Details ‘Beautiful’ Bridal Shower With Ivanka Trump, More FamilyDonald Trump Jr.’s fiancee, Bettina Anderson, celebrated her bridal shower on Sunday, April 12
Read more »
Franklin Graham defends Trump, saying the Trump didn't knowingly depict himself as JesusFranklin Graham defended President Donald Trump, saying he didn’t think he meant to post a picture portraying himself as Jesus Christ.
Read more »
Franklin Graham defends Trump, saying that Trump didn't knowingly depict himself as JesusFranklin Graham defended President Donald Trump, saying he didn’t think he meant to post a picture portraying himself as Jesus Christ.
Read more »
Hormuz Patrol: European Powers To Stick It To Trump by Doing Exactly What Trump AskedSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »