CalMatters is a nonpartisan and nonprofit news organization dedicated to serving the state of California.
A voter fills their ballot at a voting center at Powers-Ginsburg Elementary School in Fresno on March 5, 2024. Residents all over California are participating in the primary elections throughout the state.
This story is free to read because readers choose to support LAist. If you find value in independent local reporting,The case centered on the boundaries of a Louisiana congressional district. The court found by a 6-3 majority that Louisiana had relied too heavily on race to decide the borders.
“One may lament partisan gerrymandering, but … partisan gerrymandering claims are not justiciable in federal court,” wrote Justice Samuel Alito for the majority. “And in a racial gerrymandering case like the one before us, race and politics must be disentangled. ” The ruling scales back Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which prohibits voting practices that discriminate against people based on their race. If you're enjoying this article, you'll love our daily newsletter, The LA Report.
Each weekday, catch up on the 5 most pressing stories to start your morning in 3 minutes or less. A new study from UC Irvine finds using a tablet or TV to distract children can lead to more behavior problems down the line. Why LA college students are ditching $30 Ubers for the Metro Free passes, safer stations, rising gas prices and expanding lines are inspiring a new generation to ditch cars and ride transit.
But when it comes to House majority math in the U.S. Congress and which party clinches a majority in the November election, the curtailing of Section 2 could make Democrats’ Prop. 50 gains moot. Gov. Gavin Newsom put forward the measure after Texas Republicans redrew congressional boundaries to favor the GOP. Prop. 50 was meant to help Democrats pick up five additional California seats.
After the new ruling, several southern states in particular could redraw their maps to eliminate “majority-minority” districts that were drawn to magnify the power of nonwhite voters. Such a move could oust as many as 12 Democrats,, and shift the long-term balance of power in the House toward Republicans. The GOP could then control Congress’s lower chamber even if the party loses the popular vote by a wide margin. Newsom called the new ruling “outrageous.
” Attorney General Rob Bonta, also a Democrat, said in a statement that while it’s unclear what impacts the changes will have on California, the ruling overall endangers minority voters in other states.
“While the full impact of this ruling is still uncertain, we know from past experience that decisions striking down, or effectively gutting, provisions of the Voting Rights Act are often followed by new state laws that restrict access to the ballot for voters of color,” Bonta said in a statement. Kristin Nimmers, policy and campaigns manager of the Black Power Network, said in a statement that the decision rolls back “generations of progress.
” “The ability of voters to challenge discriminatory districts manipulated to drown out people’s voices based on race is a critical safeguard against being silenced,” Nimmers said. , a federal judge cited Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in declaring the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors had unconstitutionally gerrymandered their districts to exclude Latino voters. Section 2 required that redrawn district maps must be “equally open to participation” from protected groups — including racial minorities.
The Supreme Court decision on Wednesday left Section 2 intact, but significantly curtailed how it could be applied byThe high court’s three-justice liberal minority argued that the changes to Section 2 effectively dismantled the Voting Rights Act. The conservative majority on the courtChris Kieser, senior attorney with the Pacific Legal Foundation, said the ruling was a victory long hoped for by California conservatives who had argued that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act improperly used race in redistricting.
“The very idea of a majority-minority district and having a candidate of their choice is kind of antithetical to democracy,” Kieser said. “Voting is an individual right, it’s not a group right. ” The Voting Rights Act has been primarily used to help the state’s growing Latino population achieve political representation from the 1960s to the 1990s.
Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, said the ruling is unlikely to have much immediate impact in California. The ruling won’t affect California’s recent redistricting effort, he said, nor will it affect the independent state redistricting commission’s decisions. But Rosalind Gold, chief public policy officer of the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund, said the ruling has dire long-term implications for Latino representation in California.
“By eviscerating the Voting Rights Act, this could open the door to counties and localities looking at how they used Section 2 to draw their maps and challenging those maps,” Gold said. You come to LAist because you want independent reporting and trustworthy local information. Our newsroom doesn’t answer to shareholders looking to turn a profit. Instead, we answer to you and our connected community.
We are free to tell the full truth, to hold power to account without fear or favor, and to follow facts wherever they lead . Our only loyalty is to our audiences and our mission: to inform, engage, and strengthen our community. Right now, LAist has lost $1.7M in annual funding due to Congress clawing back money already approved.
The support we receive from readers like you will determine how fully our newsroom can continue informing, serving, and strengthening Southern California.
Drawing Districts Redistricting Redrawn Districts Scotus Supreme Court Voting Rights Act
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Democrats dealt blow by Virginia Supreme Court after redistricting winVirginia’s high court lets injunction stand, leaving Democrats’ voter‑approved redistricting amendment in jeopardy.
Read more »
Supreme Court rules on key Voting Rights Act rule as Republicans and Democrats wage redistricting warFox News Channel offers its audiences in-depth news reporting, along with opinion and analysis encompassing the principles of free people, free markets and diversity of thought, as an alternative to the left-of-center offerings of the news marketplace.
Read more »
Supreme Court limits Voting Rights Act in setback for Black DemocratsThe Supreme Court retreats from 1986 rules that called for electing Blacks and Latinos to Congress and state and local boards.
Read more »
California Democrats freak out after bombshell Supreme Court ruling on Louisiana redistrictingToday's Video Headlines: 04/29/26
Read more »
Supreme Court ruling on voting won’t change California districts, but could hurt DemocratsA new U.S. Supreme Court ruling narrowing the Voting Rights Act likely won't alter California political districts, but it could set back Democrats in Congress.
Read more »
Supreme Court ruling on voting won’t change California districts, but could hurt DemocratsThe U.S. Supreme Court has narrowed the Voting Rights Act over the past decade. The law in California was primarily used to help Latinos gain political representation.
Read more »