Twenty-three state Republican attorneys general are challenging credit rating downgrades of fossil fuel companies by Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s, arguing the downgrades are based on flawed ESG metrics and potentially violate federal and state laws. They allege the agencies are biased due to pledges to incorporate ESG into their ratings and participation in groups promoting net-zero emissions, ultimately impacting fossil fuel production and gas prices.
Twenty-three state Republican attorneys general sent a letter to Fitch, S&P, and Moody’s for downgrading fossil fuel companies over what they believe are flawed environmental, social, and governance metrics.
The Republican attorneys general sent their letter as the three ratings agencies downgraded fossil fuel companies based on what they believe are “highly speculative ESG predictions and goals. ”, including the fact that all three agencies have pledged to a United Nations-backed group that they will “incorporat ESG into credit ratings and analysis in a systematic … way,” and Moody’s and.
The Ratings Agencies have used the same flawed methodologies to downgrade, or to threaten to downgrade, states and municipalities with fossil-fuel production revenues. The Ratings Agencies’ actions in creating and maintaining the Downgrades implicate federal laws related to their obligations as SEC-registered ratings organizations to follow stated methodologies and avoid conflicts, and also implicate state consumer protection laws that prohibit misrepresentations and omissions.
These failures ripple throughout the economy, reducing fossil-fuel production and contributing to the current high gas prices facing consumers. The attorneys general wrote that Moody’s and Standard and Poor’s joined the Net Zero Financial Service Providers Alliance, an organization that the attorneys general have warned would violate antitrust laws and would require drastic emissions cuts.
“Because net zero requires fossil-fuel consumption to be slashed by over 70 percent between 2022 and 2050, Moody’s and S&P were pledging to use their ratings to increase the cost of capital for fossil-fuel companies and decrease investment in those companies. Both of those effects would reduce fossil-fuel production,” the attorney general contended.
The attorneys general said that the ratings agencies have made many incorrect predictions about the state of ESG, which includes: The Ratings Agencies’ incorrect predictions include: stricter policy and regulations by governments, but governments have moved away from or not enacted net-zero policies; an accelerating “peak hydrocarbon” date leading to “stranded assets,” but the IEA now says oil and gas demand will continue to rise through 2050 and coal will remain the leading source of electricity through 2040; renewable energy taking fossil-fuel market share, but governments are reducing subsidies, and automakers have written off over $70 billion in electric vehicle investments; and increased ESG investment mandates, but net-zero alliances have collapsed, ESG funds are experiencing net outflows, and the traditional energy sector is outperforming the broader market by the biggest margin in history.
Given many of the issues they laid out in their letter to the ratings agencies, they demanded the agencies explain the reason for downgrading these energy producers, withdraw or disclose their ESG-related commitments, revise their sector-specific methodologies, eliminate or disclose ESG consulting conflicts, and certify internal controls review.
“The Ratings Agencies’ Downgrades were largely premised on far-fetched ESG goals that have not materialized. The Downgrades violated stated methodologies and reflected undisclosed material conflicts of interest, implicating SEC rules and state consumer protection laws,” they concluded in their letter.
“The Ratings Agencies also have harmed states with fossil-fuel production, including by using similarly flawed methodologies to create the State Downgrades. The combined settlements for the Ratings Agencies’ prior methodological failures exceeded $2.3 billion, and the legal theories supporting enforcement here are at least as strong.
”Will Hild, the executive director of Consumers’ Research, said in a statement to Breitbart News: Ratings agencies like Fitch, Moody’s, and S&P should be providing objective financial analysis for consumers and investors to rely on, not using their market power to push woke ideology. As the state Attorneys General expose in this letter, these ratings groups have been weaponizing their credit ratings in an effort to push a radical ESG agenda.
Instead of providing analysis through the lens of fiduciary duty and financial prosperity, these woke activists are colluding with UN-backed climate activists and using flawed methodologies to meet arbitrary net-zero and ESG goals. Thanks to leadership by the AGs, the depths of collusion by the woke cartel continues to be exposed. Consumers’ Research will continue to support elected officials who are ensuring consumers are protected from woke activists.
It is absurd that ratings agencies claim to measure environmental, social, and governance performance while awarding stronger marks to a CCP-owned company tied to an authoritarian regime with a well-documented human-rights record than to major U.S. energy firms. That contradiction becomes even more glaring when China has expanded coal capacity at a pace exceeding much of the rest of the world combined, undermining any serious claim that these scores are rooted in consistent environmental standards.
Outcomes this detached from reality underscore why the entire ESG ratings system deserves every ounce of scrutiny it gets. Jason Isaac, the CEO of the American Energy Institute, said, “The allegations confirm what many have warned for years: ESG is not about risk assessment, it is about reshaping markets through financial coercion. Credit rating agencies appear to have abandoned objective, data-driven analysis in favor of speculative, politically aligned assumptions that penalize reliable American energy while rewarding favored industries.
” He added, “That kind of distortion doesn’t just mislead investors, it raises costs for states, undermines domestic production, and ultimately hits consumers with higher prices. If these claims hold, regulators and attorneys general should treat this as a serious breach of trust and restore integrity to the ratings process. ”that 56 percent of Americans agree that “ESG is a highly subjective, politically charged idea that is forcing progressive policies on everyday Americans resulting in higher prices for nearly everything.
”Marlow: Virginia Redistricting Ballot Measure Blatantly Illegal, Must Be OverturnedBooker: Trump’s ‘Woefully Unqualified’ Cabinet Besieged by ScandalsReport: ‘Gender-Affirming Care’ at Planned Parenthood Regional Clinics Surges 40 Percent
ESG Credit Ratings Fossil Fuels Republican Attorneys General Net Zero
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Ilhan Omar not out of the woods despite financial disclosure revision, top Republican warnsFox News Channel offers its audiences in-depth news reporting, along with opinion and analysis encompassing the principles of free people, free markets and diversity of thought, as an alternative to the left-of-center offerings of the news marketplace.
Read more »
First attack ad churns Georgia's uncertain Republican Senate primaryBridget Bowman is a national political reporter for NBC News.
Read more »
Georgia 2026 voter’s guide: Republican Party ballot questionsWhen Georgia voters go to the polls on May 19 for the state’s primary, voters choosing a Republican primary ballot will see eight questions in addition to the various offices up for election.
Read more »
John Seymour dies at 88; was last Republican to represent California in the U.S. SenateHe was appointed to the Senate by then-incoming Gov. Pete Wilson in 1991, then was defeated by Dianne Feinstein a year later.
Read more »
‘DIGNIDAD’ Republican Maria Salazar Says She Welcomes Primary ChallengerSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
Exclusive — 23 Republican State Attorneys General Investigate Ratings Agencies Downgrading Energy Producers over ESG MetricsSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »