A new report from Citrin Cooperman reveals that the value of older music catalogs has remained stable over the past three years, even as investment in music royalties continues to rise. The firm's music and entertainment valuation services group assessed 566 catalogs in 2025, worth nearly $13 billion, up from $10.7 billion the previous year. Notable trends include increased value in publishing catalogs and growing investor interest in Christian music.
Older music catalog multiples, a key metric in valuing copyrights, have held steady for the past three years, even as the market for investing in music royalties continues to grow, according to a new report from Citrin Cooperman.
Citrin says its music and entertainment valuation services group priced 566 catalogs that were worth nearly $13 billion combined in 2025, up from 557 catalogs valued at a total of $10.7 billion in 2024. Last year saw some star-studded deals, fromMore valuable publishing catalogs and hip-hop catalogs changed hands last year, and Christian music catalogs began to get greater investor attention, according to Citrin’s findings. “Citrin Cooperman has reached such a large volume of catalog reviews that we actually have a representative view of how the market is getting structured,”, a partner in Citrin’s music and entertainment valuation services practice, to walk us through the highlights of their 2025 work. In 2024, the average deal size for a catalog Citrin valued was around $19 million. In 2025, it rose to nearly $23 million. What accounts for the increase?It speaks to there having been some significant, valuable catalogs and publishing specific ones that transacted last year. In 2025, 41% of the total combined value of the catalogs you valued came from publishing rights only catalogs, compared to about 40% of the pie coming from catalogs that had a mix of publishing and masters rights. With more revenue coming from streaming — and master royalties benefitting more from that income stream — did more publishing rights trade hands last year because people are holding on to the masters rights?It’s likely just a function of availability. There were some outsized publishing catalogs that had transacted last year that elevated its overall share. We agree that the rise of streaming comprising a larger share of overall recorded music revenue does contribute to masters becoming more valuable. I’m not sure there was less activity among masters rights . There was a healthy amount of activity.Masters catalogs and catalogs of masters and publishing rights traded at more than a 17x multiple, and publishing right traded at around 15x multiples. However, the average multiple for younger masters catalogs was 13.7x, slightly lower than in 2024. Why is that?Multiples on younger vintage material are incredibly sensitive to how old or young that material is. Something that is three years old is very different than something that’s six and nine. Multiples tend to move up as material ages, since as the music matures, the cash flow that’s expected to decay stabilizes. five years and younger pulled it down. In 2025 compared to 2024, multiples for younger vintage masters actually declined year-over-year, and that goes back to hip-hop. We saw a lot of activity in transactions of younger vintage hip-hop catalogs. However, we saw an increase in multiples for the younger vintage publishing catalogs and younger vintage masters and publishing catalogs. That’s a function of that material being one year older. You point out that there was a lot of hip-hop catalogs transacted last year, but you also found an uptick in rock catalogs trading. What explains that increase in activity?Pop, hip-hop and rock — those are just the broadest genres that have U.S. and ex-U.S. appeal. Those genres have a lot of streaming activity, but also a lot of activity on traditional sources, like radio. They line up well with broader, generalist-types of investor strategies. Overall, we saw more activity in those broad-based, better understood, types of genres.Those formats also tend to be well-represented by business managers and lawyers. They do tend to spur the demand for that music, as well as putting it out there for market attention. Opportunistic, better educated stakeholders.It’s interesting how 2000s music performed as well as it did in the most recent year, against strong growth across all well-established release year cohorts. We found that that was an interesting development. It could just be the case that there was more virality in 2000s material than other than other . There’s been a lot ofLegal News
Music Royalties Catalog Valuation Music Industry Streaming Publishing Rights
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Shiloh Jolie Looks More Like Her Mom Than Ever Before in Her Music Video DebutShiloh Jolie makes her music video debut in Dayoung's single 'What's a Girl to Do,' ad looks just like her mom, Angelina Jolie.
Read more »
Angelina Jolie’s Daughter Shiloh, 19, Looks Just Like Famous Mom in Music Video DebutAngelina Jolie’s daughter Shiloh will make her music video debut in DAYOUNG’s ‘What's a girl to do’ music video
Read more »
Suno is a music copyright nightmareSuno makes it easy to flood streaming with AI slop covers of Beyoncé.
Read more »
Cleveland is a global stage for South Indian classical music festival, drawing thousandsPosition: Reporter
Read more »
Coachella celebrates 25 years: Take a look back at the music and memoriesFrom 1999 through 2024, the Coachella Valley Music & Arts Festival has taken place 24 times, with the 25th opening on Friday, April 11.
Read more »
Shiloh Jolie Is in Dayoung’s New Music VideoShiloh Jolie went through open auditions to get the part in Dayoung’s new music video, where it was unknown she is the daughter of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt.
Read more »