If you find it strange that I’d suggest there’s an unjust prejudice against businesspeople, surely the heightening violence against them should now be a reason to question whether you yourself have that prejudice.
The distribution center for paper-goods manufacturer Kimberly-Clark is still smoldering in Ontario, CA, on Tuesday, April 14, 2026, after a fire destroyed the facility on April 7.
Chamel Abdulkarim, of Highland, California, was charged by federal authorities with arson of a building used in interstate and foreign commerce. Abdulkarim is accused of intentionally starting multiple fires at a 1.2 million-square-foot warehouse Political assassination attempts, like the one against President Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, are rightly condemned from every political corner. So is the rising tide of political violence.
But that’s not been true of some malicious acts of domestic terrorism impacting a wider group of people. Instead of righteous indignation there’s been relative silence, or even worse, endorsement. Why? I’m speaking of the string of attacks and related threats against people who lead and work for corporations.of a 20-year-old man for throwing a Molotov cocktail at OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s home in San Francisco, and then threatening to burn down OpenAI headquarters.
The perpetrator carried a list of names and addresses of other AI company officials, and a manifesto “warning” other tech company leaders that he planned to target with violence for their support of AI technology. He was apparentlyat Altman’s house just a few days after the firebombing. A 29-year old man who burned down a Kimberly-Clark warehouse in California just days before the attack on Altman alsoto Thompson’s killer.
The July 2025 killing of four employees of Blackstone in New York City who had been mistaken for NFL executivesThe missing outrage against this trend and failure to appreciate the true nature of those who support it is a great cause for concern.on the assassination attempt against Trump in July of 2024, they had nothing to say about the killing of Brian Thompson months later, to say nothing of the recent Altman attack.by tech commentator Aaron Zamost calling the Altman attack “disturbing” and “wrong.
” But the rest of the piece focuses on rationalizing popular fear of and anger toward the tech industry, arguing that “tech has faced little to no accountability for its failures. ” Zamost suggests that violence against the tech industry is an “indictment” of the sort of failures that any fallible business suffers. Zamost’s article was titled “An Attack on Sam Altman Sends a Terrifying Message.
” Shockingly, this is what he makes of that terrifying message: “the whole thing is disturbing and jarring, but I’m hopeful it will change how some tech leaders deal with the societal consequences of their success. ” But the “whole thing” he’s referring to includes the violence. So while he says violence is the wrong way to send this message, in hoping business leaders change in response to it, he’sstillinterview by Nadja Spiegelman of Hasan Piker and Jia Tolentino.
Though the podcast was widely panned for its endorsement of shoplifting goodies from Whole Foods, few have paid attention to Piker and Tolentino’s overt endorsement of violence to terrorize corporate America into submission.looting of the 2020 George Floyd protests. Piker too says that this violence could be justified if it were part of a campaign of “organized disruption that would be infinitely more effective.
”of the Kimberly-Clark warehouse, causing nearly $500 million in damage, would have been justified if it were part of a similar collective campaign. Here’s Tolentino: “do I think some sort of fire could hypothetically be framed within a collective action that is tactically useful? Yes. ” Likewise, Tolentino expresses frustration that the Democrats didn’t immediately use the issue of Brian Thompson’s murder” to push “unified message toward universal health care.
” Piker says they are “feckless” for failing to exploit the terrorist threat for political gain. Revealingly, no one on this obscene podcast is actually willing to morally condemn the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. Instead they perversely rationalize it as a response to the “social murder” allegedly perpetrated by health insurance companies. All of this is actually much more evil than the petty pilfering that the podcast has otherwise been lampooned for advocating.
These podcasters were apologizing for and even endorsing terrorism, pure and simple. Terrorism is not just any political violence, but violence specifically directed at frightening the wider public into acquiescing into the terrorist’s political goals. The effects of Brian Thompson’s murder already show evidence of terrorism at work. After the murder, health insurance companiesby closing their headquarters and hiding the identities of their executives out of fear of such attacks.
They beefed up private security measures, not just for executives but for all their employees. And it’s not just health insurance companies. Similar security measures have been adopted by airlines, tech companies, and major retail outlets. And a third of S&P companies have Because of the abstract, hypothetical nature of their formulations, Tolentino and Piker’s statements are likely protected by the First Amendment.
That shouldn’t exempt them from our censure, and definitely not from financial consequences. If thehad any self-esteem, especially as a corporation that itself needs to be free from violence to do its business, it would fire Nadja Spiegelman for her ill-chosen podcast and foreswear any further collaboration with Piker and Tolentino. It’sdoes far more to normalize this endorsement of terrorism — and encourage more of it — than anything coming from a Twitch gamer’s channel.
As high-speed rail cost estimate soars, state lawmakers move to hide information from taxpayers But there’s also cause for soul searching here even among those who think of themselves as critics of the Marxist posturing of the Pikers of the world. Why indeed has there been so little attention to and outrage about the terrorizing of corporate America? Ben Bayer, Ph. D. in philosophy and formerly a professor, is a senior fellow at the Ayn Rand Institute.
He is the author of the forthcoming book, Breaking Free from Faith-Based Morality: The Rational Alternative to Altruism . He writes and edits for ARI’s online publication,Double murderer Betty Broderick dies at Chino hospital Judge sides with San Diego on ticketing homeless people in RVs but says city has failed to improve secure parking lot Judge sides with San Diego on ticketing homeless people in RVs but says city has failed to improve secure parking lotLas Cuatro Milpas is now ready to reopenSettlement of disputed San Diego trash fee ‘on the table,’ awaiting a decision by council, city lawyers tell judgeDecades ago, the Padres started a fun, fun, fun Mother’s Day concert tradition in Mission Valley
Please follow us on Google to support us United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Yankees aren't waiting around to refine their roster — here's whyThe Yankees are moving more urgently than they have in recent years with roster decisions, showing shorter leashes for underperforming players.
Read more »
Here's Why Each Jets Rookie Could Start, And Why They Won'tAs rookie minicamp gets underway for the Jets, it's a good time to look at why each rookie may start this season or might have to wait their turn.
Read more »
Here's Why Each Texans Rookie Could Start, And Why They Won'tThe Houston Texans' rookie class has several names who could make an intriguing bid to start in year one.
Read more »
Why Each Cleveland Browns Rookie Could Start, and Why They Won’tHere’s a breakdown of the reasons each Browns rookie from the 2026 NFL Draft has the potential to start, as well as the challenges that may hold them back.
Read more »