The trouble at the Iowa caucuses started early yesterday when volunteers said they were “struggling” to download or use the app just a few hours before the voting started
’s 2012 White House campaign had its own brush with disaster when an app called Orca, which it used for turning out voters, broke down on Election Day in November, his former chief digital strategist Zac Moffatt recalled Tuesday.
Moffatt, who was in Iowa on Monday as a caucus observer, had this take on what went wrong this time: “I’m assuming there was a combination of bad tech, bad adoption, bad education, and then people on social media showing [the app’s] vulnerabilities.”The Iowa Democratic Party has refused to release any details, though on Tuesday it blamed the problems on an unspecified “coding error.” But the trouble at the caucus started early on Monday,, when volunteers said they were “struggling” to download or use the app just a few hours before the voting started. Many precinct volunteers tried to use the party’s telephone hotline to call in the results instead — only to face hours of waiting on hold. Those reports stunned the cyber experts, who said they bore all the signs of a rush to deploy inadequately tested software without fully training the users. “The modest sum of money paid to the app provider over a couple months, the absence of any meaningful testing and the poor system performance on caucus night shows that ‘you get what you pay for,’” said Eddie Perez, global director for technology development at the OSET Institute, which advocates for open-source election systems. Precinct captain Carl Voss, of Des Moines, Iowa, holds his iPhone that shows the Iowa Democratic Party's caucus reporting app Tuesday. | Charlie Neibergall/AP Photo “As a friend wrote, Macy's doesn't [roll] out a new cash register the day before Black Friday — you test it out in a limited market and figure out the problems without the pressure,” said Jeremy Epstein, a voting security expert who is the vice chairman of the Association for Computing Machinery's U.S. Technology Policy Committee. “Writing reliable software is very hard, and I'd say this is a case in point.” Duncan Buell, a computer science professor at the University of South Carolina, likened Monday’s caucus to previous elections in which election-related software in counties in Kansas and Indiana couldn’t handle the traffic on Election Day. “One ought not be testing for the first time the ability of the system to handle a full load in a live event,” Buell said. “That's just dumb.”Plenty of people could — Buell and other cybersecurity researchers hadin the weeks before Monday about the party’s plans to use an app installed on volunteers’ personal smartphones for such a critical task, noting that phones have often proven easy prey for hackers. They also criticized both the Democrats’ and Republicans’ refusal to identify the maker of their apps or describe how they work — saying the parties were making a classic mistake in supposing that “security through obscurity” could keep a determined attacker from exploiting holes in the software. The Iowa Democratic Party said in a statement Tuesday that “in preparation for the caucuses, our systems were tested by independent cybersecurity consultants." But that didn’t satisfy any of the doubts. “Do they name who did the testing?” asked Dan Wallach, a computer science professor at Rice University. “Can we read their report? Has anybody from the testing been quoted by the press, even? If not, it doesn't mean much.”None of the experts said they had seen any evidence that a cyberattack was to blame for the failures of the app or the telephone hotline. Neither did DHS, which said in a statement that "we have no reporting of any malicious cyber activity."At the moment, “there is no way to distinguish between an inadvertent error and a malicious attack,” said one cyber researcher, who spoke on condition of anonymity in order to offer a candid opinion. “Even if we can identify a specific coding error that can explain everything that happened, we can never be certain that the error wasn’t introduced with malicious intent. This probably was just incompetence, but there’s no way to be certain.” And regardless of whether any hacking occurred, Monday’s turmoil fuels the kinds of conspiracy theories that undermine people’s faith in the electoral process — as seen in tweets from people like Trump’s son Eric, who“Even if the app wasn’t hacked, without sufficient transparency about the app and its developer, darkness is a ripe environment for disinformation campaigns,” said Perez, from the OSET Institute. “When the public doesn’t have solid information about the tools that elections depend on, it’s that much easier to raise questions about the integrity of the democratic process. Trust is built on the combination of communication + transparency — and the state party fell short in both of those areas.” Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, echoed that warning in a statement. “As we’ve seen in the past, foreign actors like Russia and China won’t hesitate to latch onto this kind of content in order to add to the domestic discord and distrust in our elections,” he said.Several of the experts were optimistic that Monday could put the kibosh on any stabs at allowing people to cast actual votes through apps or online. They noted that at least in Iowa, the in-person caucus process should leave a paper record of how people voted — a safeguard that would be lacking in an online vote in a traditional primary.on Monday to people to vote remotely, in the name of increasing participation. But it scrapped those plans last year amid warnings about security risks. “Despite the delay, we're all going to learn what the correct results are, because the results from individual sites are on paper and will eventually be reported and cross checked,” said J. Alex Halderman, a computer science professor at the University of Michigan who has tested many voting systems. “It would have been far, far worse if this was an app-based voting system — then we might never know for sure what the results were.”
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Iowa Caucus Day: A 2020 Iowa debate timeline and how we got hereFrom the presidential announcements and fundraising reports, to the debates, conflicts and departures, here's a look at the key events that have helped define and shape the contest heading into the Iowa caucuses.
Read more »
Iowa Caucuses - Iowa Caucus Results Delayed 'Due to Quality Checks'Some initial results from the caucuses were expected to be released by now, but Iowa Democratic Party spokeswoman Mandy McClure says that's going to be delayed 'due to quality checks' IowaCaucuses
Read more »
Iowa Democratic vote-reporting meltdown hands opening to TrumpThe Democratic 2020 crusade to oust President Donald Trump could not have got off to a more disastrous and embarrassing start | Analysis by StCollinson
Read more »
The Iowa caucuses' biggest loser is the Iowa caucusesWhile we wait to see who the big winners and losers were, there can be no doubt that the Iowa caucuses themselves have suffered the most significant defeat.
Read more »
Democrats' bid to challenge Trump off to a messy start in IowaThe Democratic caucuses turned into a cliffhanger in Iowa as results were delayed for hours while party officials double-checked, what they called 'inconsistencies' in the initial count. They also said this was ‘not a hack or intrusion’
Read more »