Coronavirus: Have UK experts over-egged deaths?
The drastic measures taken in the UK to tackle coronavirus have been justified because of the need to save lives. Modelling by Imperial College London - used to inform government - suggests 500,000 could die if we do nothing.
Even the government's previous strategy to slow the spread was likely to lead to 250,000 deaths, the research showed. The warnings prompted ministers to announce on Monday the most draconian crackdown on freedom in peacetime with the public told not to go to pubs, clubs or theatres, and to work from home if possible. The move has hit the economy, putting jobs at risk and prompting schools to be closed and exams cancelled.Professor Neil Ferguson, one of the lead academics involved in the modelling, told the BBC's Today Programme this week there was"no option" if 250,000 lives were not to be risked. Sir Patrick Vallance, the government's chief scientific adviser, said in an appearance before the Health Select Committee, that the hope was to keep the death toll below 20,000 by suppressing the virus.He said limiting deaths to 20,000 would be"horrible" but still represented a"good outcome" given where we are.The figures for coronavirus are eye-watering. But what is not clear - because the modellers did not map this - is to what extent the deaths would have happened without coronavirus. Of course, this will never truly be known until the pandemic is over, which is why modelling is very difficult and needs caveats.Every year more than 500,000 people die in England and Wales: factor in Scotland and Northern Ireland, and the figure tops 600,000. The coronavirus deaths will not be on top of this. Many would be within this"normal" number of expected deaths. In short, they would have died anyway. It was a point conceded by Sir Patrick at a press conference on Thursday when he said there would be"some overlap" between coronavirus deaths and expected deaths - he just did not know how much of an overlap.In contrast, the figure he gave for flu deaths to MPs - 8,000 - is different. It is actually the number of deaths over and above what you would expect to happen in any given year. Many more die with flu, but the figure gives you an indication of how many more die because of flu, whereas the 20,000, 250,000 and 500,000 figures for coronavirus are simply the number of deaths linked to coronavirus. The testing which has been done in many countries means we know when a patient dies with the virus inside their body. What it does not tell us is to what extent coronavirus contributed to the death.There are, of course, other factors at play here. Left unchecked, the deaths would come very quickly.This in itself would overwhelm the health service - if they were right - putting even more lives at risk, because care would not be available for others. But there is certainly evidence to suggest the modellers have underestimated the ability of the NHS to increase intensive care capacity.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Italy reports 427 new coronavirus deaths, overtakes China's death tollThe death toll from an outbreak of coronavirus in Italy rose in the last 24 hour...
Read more »
California coronavirus deaths rise to 19: Here is what you need to knowCoronavirus: Deaths rise to 19 in California as testing increases along with new cases.
Read more »
Cole Swindell Reschedules Tour Due to Coronavirus: 'It's Been a Crazy Scary Time Here Lately'Cole Swindell Reschedules Tour Due to Coronavirus Concerns: 'It's Been a Crazy Scary Time Here Lately'
Read more »