A new bill in Washington state, sponsored by Rep. Mia Gregerson, seeks to legalize homeless encampments statewide by preventing cities and towns from restricting them. The bill grants special legal advantages to homeless individuals, making it nearly impossible for cities to enforce existing or future ordinances.
Washington Democrats introduced another controversial bill that prevents cities and towns from limiting or banning homeless encampments, effectively legalizing them on public property statewide. Worse, it provides special legal advantages to homeless individuals, virtually guaranteeing court victories for those who challenge encampment restrictions. Sponsored by State Rep.
Mia Gregerson (D-SeaTac), restricts cities or towns to only regulate encampments on public spaces in ways deemed by a judge to be “objectively reasonable as to time, place, and manner.” This vague and subjective standard would even apply retroactively, potentially invalidating ordinances passed before this legislation existed. Under the bill, a homeless individual could sue a city or town over an encampment restriction and seek injunctive or declaratory relief. Homeless plaintiffs are also granted an affirmative defense, arguing the restriction is not reasonable. If the city or town loses the case, taxpayers would be forced to cover the plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees. It’s clear how this vague and poorly constructed law could discourage cities or towns from implementing bans or restrictions on homeless encampments. Gregerson, who has openly argued that homeless individuals have a right to camp wherever they choose, would deem most such laws unreasonable. The legislation’s lack of clarity intentionally invites inconsistent enforcement; the same law could be interpreted differently depending on the judge presiding over the case. Even if one judge sides with a city, another judge handling a challenge to the same law by a different plaintiff could easily rule the opposite way, leaving cities in perpetual legal limbo.The bill fails to define what qualifies as “objectively reasonable,” likely because the concept itself is entirely subjective when applied to laws restricting encampments. However, it explicitly instructs courts to consider the impact of such laws on the homeless when determining their reasonableness. The bill even provides a built-in defense for the homeless, allowing them to violate so-called unreasonable ordinances if they claim it was necessary to stay warm and dry. Courts are not told to consider the ordinance’s positive impact on a community. Under these circumstances, how can a city or town realistically defend an ordinance? They can’t, and that’s likely by design. This seems to explain why Rep. Gregerson didn’t bother seeking input from the cities in her district before pushing this legislation forward, according to one local lawmaker speaking to “The Jason Rantz Show” on KTTH. Most cities and towns simply cannot afford the wave of lawsuits that would inevitably arise from challenges to their homeless ordinances. Ironically, the concept of “objective reasonableness” is inherently subjective, making it costly and burdensome to repeatedly defend even clearly constitutional and just laws. For the few cities or towns with the resources to fight back, activist organizations are incentivized to keep finding new plaintiffs to challenge the same law over and over until they land a judge who sides with them. After the radical proposal drew scrutiny from both local and national media, she quietly shelved it. But her intent was never to abandon the idea — just to reintroduce it in a less obvious form. Now, HB 1360 serves as a backdoor to passing that same homelessness bill of rights. It’s just as extreme. Instead of addressing the root causes of homelessness, Gregerson is actively making the crisis worse. And it’s intentional — almost as if she’s fulfilling some twisted fantasy of watching people suffer outdoors while tying the hands of local leaders who want to enact policies that push people indoors. Is this a “squalor voyeurism” fetish? The bill already has eight co-sponsors, a troubling sign of how far-left Washington’s lawmakers have become. But the blame doesn’t just fall on these lawmakers. Voters keep electing these radicals. Those who may complain about this disastrous bill might need to take a hard look in the mirror and recognize they’re complicit.
Homelessness Washington State Legislation Mia Gregerson Encampments Cities Legal Rights
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Washington Democrat Pushes Bill to Help Unemployed Undocumented ImmigrantsA Washington state Democrat is proposing a bill to provide unemployment assistance to undocumented immigrants who are ineligible under federal law. This comes amidst a proposed crackdown on illegal immigration by the incoming Trump administration.
Read more »
Washington Democrat Pushes Bill to Study Impact of Anesthesia on Climate ChangeA Washington Democrat state senator aims to study the environmental impact of anesthetic gases used in medical, dental, and veterinary practices. The bill calls for a study on the extent of usage, emissions, and potential reduction or elimination strategies. Critics question the necessity of such a study given the negligible contribution of anesthetic gases to global emissions.
Read more »
Homelessness Rises to Record High, But Veteran Homelessness Reaches New LowThe number of homeless individuals in the U.S. has increased by 18% since last year, reaching its highest point since 2007. However, veteran homelessness has fallen to a record low, highlighting the success of the 'Housing First' approach.
Read more »
Rantz: Washington is worst in the country for chronic homelessnessWhen it comes to chronic homelessness, Washington state is doing the poorest. Policies from Washington Democrats are to blame.
Read more »
Washington Democrat Proposes Aid for Unemployed Illegal ImmigrantsA Washington state senator is proposing a bill to provide unemployment assistance to undocumented workers who are ineligible for federal benefits. This comes amid a potential crackdown on illegal immigration by the incoming Trump administration.
Read more »
Democrat Joins GOP in Backing Bill Targeting Illegal Immigrant CrimeSenator Ruben Gallego becomes the second Democrat to co-sponsor the Laken Riley Act, which would require ICE to detain illegal immigrants who commit theft, burglary, or shoplifting.
Read more »