State and local voting officials from both major parties are preparing for potential interference from the Trump administration in the upcoming midterm elections, including strengthening relationships with law enforcement and anticipating various scenarios.
Less than a year from the midterm elections , state and local voting officials from both major political parties are actively preparing for the possibility of interference by the Trump administration.Less than a year from the midterm elections , state and local voting officials from both major political parties are actively preparing for the possibility of interference by a federal government helmed by President Trump.
Steve Simon, the Democratic secretary of state of Minnesota, likened it to planning for natural disasters.Carly Koppes, the Republican clerk of Weld County in Colorado, said officials in her state are shoring up their relationships with local law enforcement and county and state attorney's offices, to make sure any effort to interfere with voting is"met with a pretty good force of resistance.""We have to plan for the worst and hope we get the best," Koppes said."I think we're all kind of conditioned at this point to expect anything and everything, and our bingo cards keep getting bigger and bigger with things that we would have never have had on them."Trump, who continues to spread false claims about voting in America, issued an executive order in the spring that sought to mandateAll of that has made it clear to those in the elections community that Trump plans to have a heavy hand in their processes next year. Here are a few things voting officials are watching for.: States control their own election processes, with Congress able to set guidelines for federal races. The president has virtually no authority when it comes to voting. But Trump is testing that, and those in his circle have pushed fringe theories for how he can change how ballots are cast and counted., press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the White House is working on a new executive order that will seemingly target mail voting. Trump also said earlier this year that he wanted toThe Supreme Court will hear a challenge to grace periods for mail ballot returns Election officials agree he does not have the legal authority to do either of those things. But recently, Trump ally and attorney Cleta Mitchell, who advised Trump in 2020, broached a bolder strategy to enact election changes: declaring a national emergency. "The president's authority is limited in his role with regard to elections except where there is a threat to the national sovereignty of the United States — as I think that we can establish with the porous system that we have," Mitchell said on asay there's no legal basis for Mitchell's theory, but numerous voting officials told NPR it's something that's come up in conversations about next year. U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., who previously oversaw voting in California as secretary of state, also brought up the scenario recently on the Senate floor. "If the Trump White House tried to declare some fake national emergency to create a pretense for federal intervention, I will force a vote here in the Senate to stop it," Padilla said. U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi listens as President Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House on Oct. 15.Washington Secretary of State Steve Hobbs, a Democrat, says six months ago he wouldn't have taken the premise of federal troops at polling places seriously.bikes nakeda desire to have federal law enforcement patrol voting locations, and this year, his former adviser Steve Bannon said on hissay such intervention is clearly illegal, but until the federal government disavows such actions clearly, Simon said voting officials have to game out how to respond. "One thing that would help is if someone at the federal government would come out and categorically say, 'No, no, no, stop the presses, stop everything. You'll never have to worry about that. That's not something we would ever consider doing,'" Simon said."That would go a long way."In response to questions about forces outside polling places, and other scenarios mentioned in this story, White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson characterized them as"baseless conspiracy theories and Democrat talking points" but did not directly answer whether the White House would commit not to send agents to voting locations. She reiterated that the president is permitted to send federal personnel to localities to help quell violent crime.For the last decade, as voting officials have fought to dam up a tsunami of false information about their work, they've begged people in their communities to go to"trusted sources" for election information.who have a history of spreading false information about elections, and local officials worry their message may be drowned out by those with much bigger megaphones. One of the hires alarming voting officials interviewed by NPR works at the Department of Homeland Security. Heather Honey, who's now deputy assistant secretary for elections integrity, worked alongside Mitchell for the past few years to help"I equate this to having a moon landing conspiracy theorist and flat earther being offered a job at NASA," Hobbs said.A poll worker holds"I Voted" stickers as people cast ballots on Nov. 4 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City.2020 also has voting officials worried about what sort of actions administration officials plan to take. Already this year, DOJ has made unprecedented requests to investigatein Colorado contacted Koppes and other clerks in that state, in some cases saying he was associated with the White House and asking about accessing their voting machines."Since 2020, people in the elections world have become even more knowledgeable of the responsibilities of the different levels of government ," Koppes said. A similar push and pull is playing out with elections data. The Trump administration has quickly built what is essentially a, and is trying to entice states to run their voting records through it to root out noncitizens on voter rolls. While many Republican election officials have eagerly embraced the system, other GOP officials and their Democratic counterparts have been, as there are questions about how well it works, what happens to the voting data once it's been run through the system and, in many states, whether even using the tool is legal under state law."It's really not a red state or blue state thing," said Al Schmidt, the Republican secretary of state of Pennsylvania, in anabout the data demands."It is a — in my view, a concerning attempt, a concerning effort to consolidate and overreach at the federal level. In the United States of America, it's the states who run elections, not the federal government."Since Trump took office, the federal government has pulled back on virtually all of its work related to cybersecurity and elections. The Department of Homeland SecurityWesley Wilcox, a Republican election supervisor in Marion County, Fla., said smaller counties especially will be more vulnerable to cyberattacks due to the cuts, and Russia, China or any other U.S. adversary may see an opportunity. "That's what I would do," Wilcox said."I mean, if I were on that side of the fence, I'm like, 'OK, they're cutting this stuff out. Let's go get them.' You know, 'cause the defenses are down." Secretary Hobbs, of Washington, told NPR that two years ago he was notified by DHS about a hack in one of his counties. The state responded immediately to make sure the breach wouldn't impact the voter registration database.said he didn't even contact DHS' cyber agency after an online candidate portal was hacked this summer because he didn't have confidence in the agency's"capacity to collaborate in good faith or to prioritize national security over political theater."
Elections Voting Midterm Elections Trump Administration Election Interference
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Netflix Stock Falls After Analyst Questions Potential Warner Bros. Discovery BidMorgan Stanley’s Benjamin Swinburne argued the streaming giant may see longterm benefits, but risks a tough regulatory path and small synergy opportunities.
Read more »
Zac Taylor keeps Bengals quarterback decision uncertain as Joe Burrow ramps up for potential returnThe Bengals are continuing to ramp up Joe Burrow for his potential return to the field.
Read more »
New Poll Finds Trump Regret Surging in Crucial Voting BlocThe survey signals trouble for Trump in 2026.
Read more »
FBI investigates cruise ship death of 18-year-old as stepbrother faces potential chargesAfter an 18-year-old girl was found dead, wrapped in a blanket and stuffed under a bed aboard a Carnival Cruise Line ship earlier this month, her teenage stepbr
Read more »
Wife hopes to have husband home for Thanksgiving as hundreds of detained immigrants await potential releaseHundreds of people detained by ICE and Border Patrol agents could be released by Friday under a federal judge's order being appealed by the Trump administration. Among them is Omar Enrique Bautista Carvajal, whose family wants him home for Thanksgiving.
Read more »
Saraya Gives Major Update On Potential Pro Wrestling ReturnSaraya, also known as Paige in WWE, confirmed to the Toronto Sun when she plans to begin training for an in-ring return.
Read more »