The Virginia Supreme Court has struck down a Democratic congressional redistricting plan that had won voter approval.
Bill to drop permitting from small building projects among 5 laws signed by Florida Gov. DeSantis.
Here’s the full listSmoky conditions possible in Duval County due to 1,400-acre wildfire in Lafayette CountyJSO says man, woman caught on surveillance in ‘suspicious incident’ on Blanding Blvd. were located safe State says Jacksonville gang war spilled into Tampa as closing arguments end in Julio Foolio murder trialJury deliberating in trial of 4 men accused in killing of Jacksonville rapper Julio FoolioMan seriously injured in Butler Beach road rage shooting describes harrowing encounter, shares warning for other drivers Read full article: Man seriously injured in Butler Beach road rage shooting describes harrowing encounter, shares warning for other driversWhy is it so smoky outside?
Jacksonville faces unhealthy air quality from wildfire more than 100 miles west Read full article: Why is it so smoky outside? Jacksonville faces unhealthy air quality from wildfire more than 100 miles westA person votes in the Virginia redistricting referendum at Lake Braddock Secondary School, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Burke, Va. An election worker tears off"I Voted" stickers during the Virginia redistricting referendum at Fairfax Government Center, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Fairfax, Va.
State Senate Minority Leader Ryan McDougle, center, speaks outside the Supreme Court of Virginia after arguments were heard in a redistricting-related case at the court in Richmond, Va. , on Monday, April 27, 2026. Attorney Matthew Seligman, representing Democratic state legislators, speaks with the media following a hearing on new congressional maps before the state Supreme Court in Richmond, Va. , on Monday, April 27, 2026.
A person votes in the Virginia redistricting referendum at Lake Braddock Secondary School, Tuesday, April 21, 2026, in Burke, Va. The Virginia Supreme Court on Friday struck down a voter-approved Democratic congressional redistricting plan, delivering another major setback to the party in a nationwide battle against Republicans for an edge in this year's midterm elections.
The court ruled that the state's Democratic-led legislature violated procedural requirements when it placed the constitutional amendment on the ballot to authorize the mid-decade redistricting. Voters“This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void,” the court said in its opinion.
Democrats had hoped to win as many as four additional U.S. House seats under Virginia's redrawn U.S. House map as part of an attempt to offset Republican Legislative voting districts typically are redrawn once a decade after each census to account for population changes. But Trump started an unusual flurry of mid-decade redistricting last year whenin Texas to redraw districts in a bid to win several additional U.S. House seats and hold on to their party's narrow majority in the midterm elections.drawn to Democrats' advantage, and Utah's top court imposed a new congressional map that also helps Democrats.
Meanwhile, Republicans stand to gain from new House districts passed in Florida, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee. They could add even more after the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the Voting Rights Act case, which has prompted Virginia currently is represented in the U.S. House by six Democrats and five Republicans who were elected from districts imposed by a court after a bipartisan redistricting commission failed to agree on a map after the 2020 census.
The new districts could have given Democrats an improved chance to win all but one of the state's 11 congressional seats. Under the Demcoratic-drawn map, five districts would have been anchored in the Democratic stronghold of northern Virginia, including one stretching out like a lobster to consume Republican-leaning rural areas. Revisions to four other districts across Richmond, southern Virginia and Hampton Roads would have diluted the voting power of conservative blocs in those areas.
And a reshaped district in parts of western Virginia would have lumped together three Democratic-leaning college towns to offset other Republican voters. The state Supreme Court’s seven justices are appointed by the state legislature, which has toggled back and forth between Democratic, Republican and split control over recent years.
Legal experts say the body doesn’t have a set ideological profile The case before the court focused not on the shape of the new districts but rather on the process the General Assembly used to authorize them. Because the state’s redistricting commission was established by a voter-approved constitutional amendment, lawmakers had to propose an amendment to redraw the districts.
That required approval of a resolution in two separate legislative sessions, with a state election sandwiched in between, to place the amendment on the ballot. The legislature’s initial approval of the amendment occurred last October — while early voting was underway but before it concluded on the day of the general election. The legislature’sfocused on whether the legislature’s initial approval of the amendment came too late, because early voting already had begun for the 2025 general election.
Attorney Matthew Seligman, who defended the legislature, argued that the “election” should be defined narrowly to mean the Tuesday of the general election. In that case, the legislature’s first vote on the redistricting amendment occurred before the election and was constitutional, he told judges. An attorney for the plaintiffs, Thomas McCarthy, argued that an “election” should be interpreted to cover the entire period during which people can cast ballots, which lasts several weeks in Virginia.
If that’s the case, he told justices, then the legislature’s initial endorsement of the redistricting amendment came too late to comply with the state constitution. In January, a judge in rural Tazewell County, in southwestern Virginia, ruled that lawmakers failed to follow their own rules for adding the redistricting amendment tolast fall.
Circuit Judge Jack Hurley Jr. also ruled that lawmakers failed to initially approve the amendment before the public began voting in last year’s general election and that the state had failed to publish the amendment three months before the election, as required by law. As a result, he said, the amendment is invalid and void. The Virginia Supreme Court placed Hurley’s order on hold and allowed the redistricting vote to proceed before hearing arguments on the case.
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission. Brantley County launches ‘one-stop’ website for residents as crews move to recovery effortsFSU, Georgia football cancel 2027, 2028 home-and-home series3:50What choices are you making as cost of living rises?
Man found dead in motel parking lot on Philips HighwayClay County Schools job fair draws hundreds of applicants for 200 open positionsJU Women's Lacrosse Headed Back to the Dance. 🥍Sun, fun & May has begun: Weekend Events You’ll Love From May 7 - 10‘Everybody needs to calm down’: Neighbor stunned after road rage shooting in Butler BeachBolles Boys Lacrosse locked in on the final 4🥍👀Nonprofit steps up to help families who lost homes in Brantley County wildfires sift through rubble
Donald Trump Jack Hurley Jr. U.S. News Washington News Politics Thomas Mccarthy Matthew Seligman
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Federal court rules against new global tariffs Trump imposed after loss at the Supreme CourtA federal court has ruled against the new global tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed after a stinging loss at the Supreme Court.
Read more »
Federal court rules against new global tariffs Trump imposed after loss at the Supreme CourtA federal court has ruled against the new global tariffs that President Donald Trump imposed after a stinging loss at the Supreme Court.
Read more »
Federal court blocks Trump’s 10% global tariffs levied after Supreme Court lossThe U.S. Court of International Trade narrowly blocked the tariffs, set to expire in July, that applied to the plaintiffs.
Read more »
Federal court rules against new global tariffs Trump imposed after loss at the Supreme CourtA federal court panel in New York ruled 2-1 finding he overstepped his legal authority.
Read more »