A Massachusetts man has been found guilty of conspiring to unlawfully export electronic components to Iran, violating U.S. sanctions.
Iranian American defendant Mahdi Mohammad Sadeghi poses for a photo Friday, July 10, 2026, before heading into federal court in Boston. – A Massachusetts man was found guilty Monday of conspiring to unlawfully export electronic components to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions.
, who worked at the global electronics company Analog Devices, was accused of helping an Iranian business associate get around American export control laws. U.S. prosecutors say the business associate’s Tehran-based company makes navigation systems for the militaryThe second defendant, Mohammad Abedininajafabadi, called Abedini in court documents, was not on trial. He is believed to be in Iran after an apparent Sadeghi was found guilty on three of the five charges.
He showed no visible reaction to the verdict, which came early in the fourth day of jury deliberations. He and his lawyers did not comment as they left court, and he will remain free until sentencing Oct. 13“At its core, this case is straightforward. You cannot send goods, especially the goods at issue in this case, to Iran. Period.
Full stop,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Alathea Porter told the jury.
“The defendant knew that, and conspired with Mr. Abedini to do that. ” Assistant U.S. Attorney Jared Dolan, in his closing remarks, said documents, text messages and photos proved that the illegal acts were the “fruits of this relationship” between Sadeghi and Abedini.
“The evidence established that he knew what Abedini was doing because he told him in writing,” Dolan said. “He helped him anyway. ” Sadeghi's attorney, William Fick, told jurors that the scheme laid out by the prosecution “makes no sense” and was full of holes. He said Sadeghi was only offering advice to a longtime friend about how to get business with the semiconductor company, and wasn’t responsible for procuring the parts for Abedini.
Fick said there was no proof the parts ended up in Iran, and he disputed that the Swiss company was a front.
“If you look at the world through dirty glasses, everything looks dirty,” Fick said. “That is fundamentally what the prosecution is asking you to do here. ” Fick also said prosecutors hadn't shown Sadeghi gained anything from the alleged plan — although the prosecution pointed out that they didn't need to prove a motive.
“He had nothing to gain and everything to lose,” Fick said. “He has lived in the country for decades. He was a well-regarded, respected employee on his way up in the company. ”However, before the trial, defense attorneys sought to exclude any evidence related to Abedini’s role in drone manufacturing or attacks on American troops.
The judge agreed, ruling that prosecutors could only give general evidence about Abedini’s Iranian company and how its technology had potential military applications, including for drones. During a hearing in February, prosecutors acknowledged they didn’t have evidence that Sadeghi “knew anything” about the technology he was accused of exporting was allegedly used on the drone involved in the Jordan attack. Both defendants have been charged with export control violations.
Abedini is separately charged with conspiring to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization that resulted in the deaths of three service members. Abedini was arrested at an airport in Italy on a U.S. warrant in December 2024, but was released a month later and returned to Iran. Three days after his arrest, Italianwas detained while reporting in Iran. Sala, who was believed held as a bargaining chip for Abedini’s release, returned home in January 2025.
Copyright 2026 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.2 men shot during downtown Jacksonville fight over the weekendGeorgia woman faces up to 75 years in prison for TJ Maxx, Marshalls, HomeGoods fraud schemeMurray Hill residents fear someone could get hurt as porch thefts escalateVarsity 4 All-News4JAX girls lacrosse player of the year: Episcopal’s Brooke McCoyWidower whose wife was killed in Clay County home invasion shooting launches GoFundMeBills overwhelming you?
How to negotiate monthly expenses to save you moneyPerson riding scooter dies in St. Johns County crash on SR-16 at Ponce De Leon Blvd. Man making suicidal threats on livestream shot after standoff with deputies on Blanding Blvd. A stronger El Nino brings a quieter hurricane season
Please follow us on Google to support usJared Dolan Mohammad Abedininajafabadi Technology U.S. News World News William Fick
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
US Retaliates Against Iran After Strait of Hormuz Attack; Iran Closes Vital WaterwayThe United States has launched retaliatory airstrikes on Iran following a missile attack on a commercial ship in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's Revolutionary Guard has responded by closing the strategic waterway, sparking fears of a major disruption to global oil trade and further escalation.
Read more »
US Launches Fresh Strikes on Iran, Iran Retaliates Across Middle EastThe US military conducted new strikes on Iranian targets in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday, prompting Iran to attack American facilities in multiple Middle Eastern countries, escalating tensions and threatening peace negotiations.
Read more »
US Responds After Iran Expands Gulf Strikes With Multiple Civilian Casualties in IranA tit-for-tat military exchange between the U.S. and Iran has spilled into a wider regional conflict,featuring Persian Gulf tensIon spikes and official Iranian declarations disrupting key maritime trade routes. The U.S. struck back with multi-location strikes after Iran broadened retaliation beyond imediate regional opponent targets, including a civilian death in southwest Iran.
Read more »
Iran's Repeated Game Strategy Undermines Strait of Hormuz AgreementIran is employing a repeated game approach to erode the Strait of Hormuz agreement, using calibrated provocations to gain leverage without triggering decisive retaliation. The U.S. and Iran have conflicting goals: Washington seeks an open strait and de-escalation, while Tehran aims to becOme a recognized gatekeeper. Tactics include drone threats, missile warnings, maritime delays, and fee demands, making shipping expensive and uncertain. Ambiguity in the deal allows Iran to comply formally while destroying its substance,creating a permission structure for coercion. The U.S. must realize that paper agreements alone do not change behavior; without imposing costs, the pact restrains everyone yet Iran. This dynamic also pressures Israel,as American diplomacy often expects Israeli restraint during Iranian escalations, teaching adversaries that aggression is cheap. The International Maritime Organization rejects Iran's claims, yet tanker traffic has slowed and insurers warn of risks. In repeated contests, muted responses become lessons, and Iran adjusts its pressure accordingly. The strait's psychology is shifting, encouraging accommodation of Iranian demands. the agreement must alter incentives or it becomes a tool for further coercion.
Read more »