U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Jan. 6 riot which may impact those charged in Illinois

Riot News

U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments in Jan. 6 riot which may impact those charged in Illinois
Supreme Court Of The U.S.United States CapitolJanuary 6
  • 📰 cbschicago
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 25 sec. here
  • 6 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 27%
  • Publisher: 51%

A Chicago man, Kevin Lyons​, was charged with obstruction of an official proceeding, among other charges, and sentenced to 51 months in prison.

CHICAGO — Nearly 50 Illinois residents were charged for their roles in the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.On Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that could impact some local cases.This could prompt bids for new trials or lighter sentences.CBS 2 has identified at least five cases in the Chicago area that used this federal obstruction statute that the Supreme Court is looking into.Ultimately, two of those Illinois residents were convicted.

Oral arguments took place Tuesday in the case known as Fischer v. The United States. A Chicago man, Kevin Lyons, was charged with obstruction of an official proceeding, among other charges, and sentenced to 51 months in prison.He posted a photo from outside Nancy Pelosi's office with the caption, 'WHOS HOUSE?!?!? OUR HOUSE!!'Thomas Adams of Springfield, holding a Trump 2020 flag inside the Senate Chamber, was sentenced to 14 months in prison on obstruction and other charges.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

cbschicago /  🏆 546. in US

Supreme Court Of The U.S. United States Capitol January 6 CBS 2 Investigators

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Supreme Court Hears Case That Could Impact Jan. 6 ProsecutionsSupreme Court Hears Case That Could Impact Jan. 6 ProsecutionsThe Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could affect the prosecutions of Jan. 6 participants and former President Donald Trump's criminal case. The case revolves around a federal statute used to charge Jan. 6 defendants for obstructing congressional proceedings.
Read more »

Supreme Court hears debate over charges against Trump, Jan. 6 riotersSupreme Court hears debate over charges against Trump, Jan. 6 riotersJustices will consider whether the charge of obstruction of an official proceeding can be used against those who protested Joe Biden's election win.
Read more »

Supreme Court hears challenge to law used to prosecute hundreds of Jan. 6 defendantsSupreme Court hears challenge to law used to prosecute hundreds of Jan. 6 defendantsThe case tests the statute used to prosecute hundreds of defendants charged with invading the Capitol to stop the counting of electoral ballots for president in 2020.
Read more »

Supreme Court hears challenge to law used to prosecute hundreds of Jan. 6 defendantsSupreme Court hears challenge to law used to prosecute hundreds of Jan. 6 defendantsThe case tests the statute used to prosecute hundreds of defendants charged with invading the Capitol to stop the counting of electoral ballots for president in 2020.
Read more »

Jim Nowlan: Illinois Supreme Court embarrasses itself again with Edward Burke decisionJim Nowlan: Illinois Supreme Court embarrasses itself again with Edward Burke decisionIllinois Supreme Court justices appear to recuse themselves when they shouldn’t and not recuse themselves when they should.
Read more »

Cunningham defeats Reyes in race for full-term on Illinois Supreme CourtCunningham defeats Reyes in race for full-term on Illinois Supreme CourtIncumbent Justice Joy Cunningham is in prime position to secure a full 10-year term on the Illinois Supreme Court after defeating Appellate Court Judge Jesse…
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-19 08:05:37