'Our inability, unwillingness, to put the hammer down in terms of security in the country allowed chaos to ensue, which gave rise to ISIS,' said former deputy secretary of state Richard Armitage, faulting the U.S. failure to secure Iraq.
President of the United States from 2009 to 2017WASHINGTON - From an empowered Iran and eroded U.S. influence to the cost of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq and Syria to combat Islamic State fighters, the United States still contends with the consequences of invading Iraq 20 years ago, current and former officials say.
The 2011 withdrawal of the U.S. troops from Iraq left a vacuum that Islamic State militants filled, seizing roughly a third of Iraq and Syria and fanning fears among Gulf Arab states that they could not rely on the United States. Armitage, who served under Republican Bush when the United States invaded Iraq, said the U.S. invasion "might be as big a strategic error" as Hitler's invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941, which helped bring about Germany's World War Two defeat.According to estimates published this week by the "Costs of War" project at Brown University, the U.S. price tag to date for the wars in Iraq and Syria comes to $1.
John Bolton, a war advocate who served under Bush, said even though Washington made mistakes - by failing to deploy enough troops and administering Iraq instead of quickly handing over to Iraqis - he believed removing Saddam justified the costs. In the latest example of waning U.S. influence, Iran and Saudi Arabia agreed on Friday to re-establish relations after years of hostility in a deal brokered by China.
Jim Steinberg, a deputy secretary of state under Obama, said the war raised deep questions about Washington's willingness to act unilaterally and its steadfastness as a partner.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Why US troops remain in Iraq 20 years after 'shock and awe'Twenty years ago the U.S. invaded Iraq amid blinding explosions of shock and awe
Read more »
Why US troops remain in Iraq 20 years after 'shock and awe'Twenty years ago the U.S. invaded Iraq amid blinding explosions of shock and awe.
Read more »
Why US troops remain in Iraq 20 years after 'shock and awe'Twenty years after the U.S. invaded Iraq — in blinding explosions of shock and awe — American forces remain in the country in what has become a small but consistent presence.
Read more »
Why US troops remain in Iraq 20 years after 'shock and awe'Twenty years ago the U.S. invaded Iraq amid blinding explosions of shock and awe.
Read more »
U.S. invasion of Iraq 20 years later \u2014 'Intelligence Matters'Former Acting CIA Director Michael Morell on CIA Iraq assessment: 'We were wrong on the chemical weapons judgment, we were wrong on the biological weapons judgment, and we were wrong on the nuclear weapons judgment.'
Read more »
Why US troops remain in Iraq 20 years after ‘shock and awe’Twenty years after the U.S. invaded Iraq, in blinding explosions of shock and awe, American forces remain in the country. Here’s a look at America’s evolving role in Iraq.
Read more »