The U.K. Supreme Court ruled that the government's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful due to the risk of ill-treatment. The plan aimed to stop migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats. The U.K. signed a deal with Rwanda to process asylum claims there.
The U.K. Supreme Court ruled that the government's plan to send asylum seekers to Rwanda was unlawful due to the risk of ill-treatment. The plan aimed to stop migrants crossing the English Channel in small boats .
The U.K. signed a deal with Rwanda to process asylum claims there.
U.K. Supreme Court Asylum Seekers Rwanda Unlawful Ill-Treatment Migrants English Channel Small Boats Deal Asylum Claims
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
UK's plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda ruled unlawful by Supreme CourtThe UK’s controversial plan to send asylum-seekers to Rwanda was ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court Wednesday, dealing a potentially fatal blow to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s flagship migration policy and sparking a furious revolt from the right wing of British politics.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court Rules Against Deportation Plan to RwandaBritain's plan to deport asylum-seekers to Rwanda has been ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, dealing a blow to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's migration policy and potentially causing a revolt within his Conservative party.
Read more »
Supreme Court to Intervene in Digital Speech ConflictsThe court’s decisions in three major cases this term could fundamentally alter how social media platforms operate.
Read more »
UK Supreme Court Rules Against Government's Asylum Seeker SchemeUK's top court ruled the Rwanda plan, under which Britain intended to send thousands of asylum seekers who arrived on its shores without permission to the East African country in a bid to deter migrants crossing the Channel from Europe, unlawful
Read more »
Democratic Lawmakers Condemn Supreme Court's Nonbinding Code of ConductDemocratic lawmakers criticize the Supreme Court for releasing a nonbinding code of conduct without any enforcement mechanism. The code provides guidelines on avoiding impropriety but lacks the ability to reprimand or determine violations. This makes Supreme Court justices the only federal judges without a binding ethics code.
Read more »
Supporters Urge Wisconsin Supreme Court to Reject Lawsuit Against School Choice ProgramsSupporters of Wisconsin’s taxpayer-funded school choice and independent charter school programs urged the state Supreme Court on Tuesday to reject a lawsuit seeking to declare the programs unconstitutional, saying such a move would create chaos for tens of thousands of families with students currently enrolled.
Read more »