The Trump administration's efforts to keep coal-fired power plants operational, including an order to keep a Colorado unit open past its planned retirement, are facing legal and practical challenges from utilities and environmental groups. The administration claims these measures are necessary to ensure grid stability and affordable energy, while critics argue the closures are part of a planned transition towards cleaner energy sources.
The Craig Station power complex in northwest Colorado has three coal-fired units. Its operators planned to retire one unit at the end of 2025, and built wind and solar farms to replace it. But the Trump administration has ordered the unit to stay open and available for now.
President Trump ran for office promising to restore a future for coal in the U.S. He now has new hardware confirming his status as a top industry ally: a trophy hailing him as the"Undisputed Champion of Beautiful Clean Coal." Trump received the statue — a bronze coal miner bearing a pickax — from an industry lobbying group earlier this month, just before signing an"We're going to be buying a lot of coal through the military now," Trump said."It's going to be less expensive and actually much more effective than what we have been using for many, many years." The order marks the Trump administration's latest move to boost the coal industry. Over the last two decades, utilities have closedof coal-fired power plants in favor of cheaper options like wind, solar and natural gas. The shift has cut U.S. But since returning to office, the administration has issued emergency orders to keep eight coal units operating past their planned retirement dates, arguing that their closure would raise power bills and threaten grid stability. Environmental groups and several states have challenged the orders, saying the retirements are part of a planned transition, not a crisis. Now, the administration is also facing pushback from two Colorado utilities, which say the federal government's order is both unnecessary and unconstitutional. "Their claim is that they had planned to retire this plant, and they had been making preparations to retire the plant for some time," says Ari Peskoe, the director of the Electricity Law Initiative at Harvard Law School."All of that is effectively commandeering the property, private property, of these entities." The dispute centers on Craig Station, a hulking three-unit power complex towering over the high deserts of northwest Colorado. Electricity from the station powers mostly rural communities across the Western U.S.that closing Craig 1, the station's oldest coal-fired unit, was the most cost-effective option to serve its customers and meet air quality requirements. Then, just a day before the scheduled closure at the end of 2025, the federal government issuedColorado's attorney general and environmental groups challenged the order in late January. The next day, the Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association and the Platte River Power Authority — co-owners of the power plant — filedThe Trump administration has taken unusual steps to support the coal industry, including ordering utilities to keep coal plants open past their planned retirement dates. At a White House event in February, the president was presented a trophy by Jim Grech, president and CEO of Peabody Energy and chair of the National Coal Council. In the request, Tri-State and Platte River say they've built sufficient solar and wind farms, and no longer need Craig 1. By forcing the power plant to stay open, the plant owners say they've been forced to buy coal and invest in maintaining the facility, unnecessary expenses that amount to an"uncompensated taking" of their property in violation of the Constitution. The U.S. Department of Energy declined an interview request for this story. In an emailed statement, Caroline Murzin, an agency spokesperson, said the U.S. needs vast amounts of additional electricity generation to support domestic manufacturing and the ongoing artificial intelligence boom. "Thanks to President Trump's leadership, the Energy Department is unleashing energy dominance to reduce energy costs for American families and strengthen the electric grid," Murzin said., Tri-State CEO Duane Highly said ratepayers will shoulder the cost of keeping Craig 1 running. Tri-State and Platte River executives declined an interview to explain their objections further.conducted for the Sierra Club by Grid Strategies, an energy consulting firm, found it could cost from $85 million to $150 million annually to keep Craig 1 operating at its average output levels. That's in addition to expenses for the new wind, solar and transmission projects. "Customers will essentially be paying twice," says Matt Gerhart, a senior attorney for the Sierra Club."They'll be paying for the resources that were intended to replace Craig 1, and now they'll also be paying for the cost to keep Craig 1 open."Before Trump returned to the White House, however, the Energy Department mainly invoked its authority during wars and extreme weather events, such as hurricanes or cold snaps, according to a In Colorado, Tri-State and Platte River contend that there's no situation to justify an emergency order. In Michigan, environmental groups have filedThat court decision is expected sometime next summer, says Peskoe, and could determine whether the Trump administration is acting within the boundaries of federal law by forcing coal plants to stay open.Mexican army kills leader of Jalisco New Generation Cartel, official saysKPBS keeps you informed with local stories you need to know about — with no paywall. Our news is free for everyone because people like you help fund it.Public Safety
Coal Energy Trump Administration Colorado Power Plants Renewable Energy
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Why the Trump administration is focused on the defense industrial baseIndustrial power wins wars. Unfortunately, America's defense industrial base is weak. The Trump administration is looking to change that.
Read more »
Jeffries: Trump Administration Is Using Taxpayer Dollars to ‘Brutalize or Kill’ AmericansSource of breaking news and analysis, insightful commentary and original reporting, curated and written specifically for the new generation of independent and conservative thinkers.
Read more »
South Africans dispute Trump's claim of genocide as administration welcomes some to U.S. as refugeesPresident Trump claims White farmers in South Africa are victims of a genocide. South Africans dispute his claim.
Read more »
Trump doubles down on trade war as administration leaves question of tariff refunds to the courtsPresident Donald Trump is doubling down on his trade war, plunging US companies, consumers and trade partners into fresh uncertainty. Follow for live updates.
Read more »
Bill would restrict Trump administration’s push for ICE detention centersThe legislation underscores qualms that lawmakers in both parties have expressed about a push to set up facilities in their states and districts.
Read more »
Whistleblower Documents Reveal Drastic Cuts to Immigration Officer Training Under Trump AdministrationDocuments obtained from whistleblowers show significant reductions in training requirements for new immigration officers during the Trump administration, including the elimination of practical exams and reduced training time. These cuts contradict official statements and raise concerns about the preparedness of officers.
Read more »