President Donald Trump and his administration are at odds with state governments over the regulation of artificial intelligence, with the White House actively working to preempt state-level initiatives and advocating for a unified national framework.
US President Donald Trump addressed the press upon his arrival at Miami International Airport in Miami, Florida, on March 27, 2026. His appearance preceded remarks at the FII PRIORITY Summit in Miami Beach. The backdrop to Trump's statements is a growing divergence between the federal government and state legislatures regarding the regulation of artificial intelligence.
In the absence of decisive federal action, individual states have been actively crafting their own AI regulations, tackling issues ranging from child safety protocols to transparency requirements and whistleblower protections. However, these state-level initiatives, even those spearheaded by members of President Trump's own political party, are facing significant resistance from the White House. Trump and his advisors, including AI and crypto czar David Sacks, have voiced concerns that these state-specific laws could hinder innovation. The administration, advocating for a unified national framework, views the current landscape of state-specific AI regulations as a 'patchwork' that impedes the development and deployment of new technologies. A key argument from the White House, articulated by officials like Michael Kratsios, former head of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, stresses the importance of a singular national framework to provide certainty for innovators, a role they believe Congress is uniquely positioned to fulfill. \The White House's intervention in state-level AI regulation is not merely a theoretical stance. Concrete examples exist where the administration has directly influenced legislative outcomes, even when those initiatives align with principles generally supported by the president's party. One such instance involves State Rep. Doug Fiefia, R-Utah, who introduced a bill intended to enhance transparency from technology companies regarding consumer protection. Fiefia's bill, however, was blocked, allegedly due to direct intervention from the Trump administration, conveyed through a concise memo. According to Fiefia, the memo communicated the administration's opposition to the bill, considering it unfixable and incompatible with the administration's overarching AI agenda. The lack of specific justification within the memo left proponents of the state bill frustrated and unclear about the exact reasons for the federal opposition. The White House has stated it has never prohibited a state from enacting child safety measures, though it has not commented specifically on the memo sent to Fiefia. Fiefia, who has prior experience at Google, noted that the White House's stance was not surprising, given pre-existing concerns he had heard from the administration regarding his bill. He also emphasized that states have a crucial role in safeguarding their citizens, particularly concerning child safety, given the gridlock in Congress. He and other state lawmakers express frustration with the federal government's slow pace of action.\State lawmakers like Senator Tracy Pennycuick, a Pennsylvania Republican, echo similar sentiments, emphasizing the ability of states to quickly address emerging problems and adapt to rapidly changing technological landscapes. Pennycuick and others believe that the state has to continue working on AI regulations. These regulations include measures requiring AI companies to take extra precautions to prevent their chatbots from generating content encouraging self-harm or violence. Experts and lawmakers debate the balance between federal and state control of AI regulations. While there is broad support for a single set of rules, some experts find the White House framework lacking in crucial details. Riki Parikh, policy director at the Alliance for Secure AI, says that the framework is not specific enough on issues such as job displacement and accountability for tech companies. Despite expressing concern over the patchwork of regulations, others acknowledge the lack of strong federal laws. Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti sees the administration's framework as a positive step. He was concerned about a push last year for a moratorium on state AI laws. The current framework lays out principles on how the administration wants Congress to move on AI technology, including protecting children and consumers
Artificial Intelligence AI Regulation Donald Trump State Laws Federal Government Innovation Child Safety Technology
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump administration seeks Endangered Species Act exemption for oil, gas projects in GulfThe Trump administration is seeking an exemption from the Endangered Species Act for expanded oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, citing national security as it wages war on Iran.
Read more »
Trump administration seeks Endangered Species Act exemption for Gulf drillingThe Trump administration is seeking an exemption from the Endangered Species Act for expanded oil and gas drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, citing national security as it wages war on Iran. Environmental groups argue the government hasn’t followed proper procedure and they're seeking to block a meeting by the Endangered Species Committee on Tuesday.
Read more »
Appeals court sides with Trump administration on immigration detention without bondSeveral lower courts across the country have found the practice unlawful.
Read more »
U.S. appeals court sides with Trump administration on detaining immigrants without bondThe opinion from a panel of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis overturned a lower court ruling and sided with the Trump administration.
Read more »
Trump administration declines Musk's offer to pay TSA workersThe Trump administration has apparently turned down Elon Musk's offer to fund TSA workers impacted by the partial government shutdown.
Read more »
Trump administration probes race in admissions at 3 medical schoolsThe Trump administration has opened investigations into how race is considered in admissions at three medical schools, ratcheting up its pressure campaign against colleges and universities.
Read more »