The Trump administration is pushing for the the U.S. Supreme Court to allow some restrictions on birthright citizenship even as legal battles continue over President Donald Trump’s orders to end what has long been seen as a constitutional promise.
A Houston disabled veteran claims he was swindled out of thousands of dollars by a mechanic who he said failed to complete repairs.‘Frustration is an understatement’: Veteran alleges mechanic swindled him out of $8,800 for unfinished car repairs Read full article: ‘Frustration is an understatement’: Veteran alleges mechanic swindled him out of $8,800 for unfinished car repairs NASHVILLE, TN - MARCH 13: Texas Longhorns forward Jayson Kent hooks his arm around Texas A&M Aggies guard CJ Wilcher as he drives to the basket during a second round game of the SEC Tournament between the Texas Longhorns and Texas A&M Aggies, March 13, 2025 at Bridgestone Arena in Nashville, Tennessee.
Texas knocks off rival A&M in double overtime, advances to SEC tournament quarterfinalsSee these Insider Deals for home, beauty and sports enthusiastsFILE - In this Sept. 16, 2015, photo, a woman in Sullivan City, Texas, who said she entered the country illegally, walks with her daughter who was born in the United States, but was denied a birth certificate. restrictions on birthright citizenship even as legal battles continue over President Donald Trump's orders to end what has long been seen as a constitutional promise. On Thursday, the administration filed emergency applications with the high court that would allow citizenship to be denied to people born in the U.S. after Feb. 19 if their parents are in the country illegally., Massachusetts and Washington have blocked the order, which Trump signed shortly after taking office in January. It is currently blocked nationwide. Birthright citizenship automatically makes anyone born in the United States an American citizen, including children born to mothers in the country illegally. The right was enshrined soon after the Civil War in the Trump and his supporters have argued that there should be tougher standards for becoming an American citizen, which he called “a priceless and profound gift” in his executive order. Legal scholars, though, have said its the 14th Amendment's constitutional protections would make it it extremely difficult to overturn. Here is a look at birthright citizenship, what Trump has said about it and the prospects for ending it: “It’s ridiculous. We are the only country in the world that does this with the birthright, as you know, and it’s just absolutely ridiculous,” he said in January. Dozens of countries, mostly in the Americas, have birthright citizenship. Opponents say the practice encourages people to come to the U.S. illegally so their children can have citizenship. Others argue that ending birthright citizenship Its elimination “could eventually place every single person in America in the precarious position of having to prove American citizenship,” Alex Nowrasteh, vice president for economic and social policy studies at the pro-immigration Cato Institute, wrote after Trump's order. In 2019, the Migration Policy Institute estimated that 5.5 million children under age 18 lived with at least one parent in the country illegally in 2019, representing 7% of the U.S. child population. The vast majority of those children were U.S. citizens.“All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States,” the amendment says. But it didn't always apply to everyone. It wasn't until 1924, for example, that Congress granted citizenship to all Native Americans born in the U.S. Supporters of immigration restrictions, including Trump, have argued the words “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” allow the U.S. to deny citizenship to babies born to women in the country illegally.The emergency appeal does not focus directly on whether the presidential order is legally valid. Instead, it is aimed at the broad reach of orders issued by federal judges. The Justice Department argues individual judges lack the power to make their rulings go into affect nationwide. Five of the Supreme Court's conservative justices have raised concerns in the past about these nationwide injunctions. The high court, though, has never ruled on the matter. Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.This may be the last PDF app you ever need
Alex Nowrasteh Donald Trump Race Politics Washington News U.S. News
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Trump's Firings Could Overturn Century-Old Supreme Court Precedent on Agency OfficialsPresident Donald Trump's rapid dismissals of independent agency officials are testing a nearly 100-year-old Supreme Court precedent that protects certain officials from politically motivated removals. The firings, which target individuals with legal protections against dismissal without cause, are likely to lead to a Supreme Court case challenging Humphrey's Executor v. US (1935), a ruling that allows Congress to require presidents to show justification for dismissing board members overseeing independent agencies. Overturning this precedent could grant presidents significant power to remove officials enforcing antitrust laws, labor regulations, and disclosure requirements for publicly traded companies.
Read more »
Trump Administration Faces Wave of Lawsuits, Many Expected to Reach Supreme CourtPresident Trump's agenda has been met with a surge of lawsuits since his inauguration, with legal experts predicting many will ultimately land before the Supreme Court. The lawsuits target a wide range of Trump's actions, including executive orders on birthright citizenship, immigration policies, and federal funding freezes. Critics argue these actions violate the Constitution and federal laws, while supporters maintain they are necessary to implement Trump's agenda. The article highlights several prominent cases, including a challenge to the Trump administration's freezing of federal funds and a lawsuit against the administration's attempt to redefine sex in Title IX.
Read more »
Trump Administration May Ask Supreme Court to Overturn Agency Independence PrecedentProject 2025, a watchdog group, criticized the Trump administration's potential move to challenge the 1935 Humphrey's Executor ruling, which protects the independence of federal agencies. The Justice Department, under acting solicitor general Sarah Harris, informed Congress of its intention to not defend statutory tenure protections for agencies like the FTC, NLRB, and CPSC, arguing that relying on Humphrey's Executor makes those protections unconstitutional. Harris stated the DOJ would request the Supreme Court to overturn the precedent if it stands in the way of this stance. While not a formal Supreme Court brief, the letter signals the administration's willingness to challenge this long-standing precedent, which faces scrutiny in various pending cases linked to Trump's firings of seemingly protected workers.
Read more »
Federal appeals court queues up first test of Trump’s power for Supreme CourtA federal appeals court in Washington on Saturday allowed the head of a government ethics watchdog agency whom President Donald Trump fired last week to stay on the job, a decision that will likely tee up the fight over similar dismissals for the Supreme Court.
Read more »
Trump Administration Appeals to Supreme Court to Overturn Whistleblower ProtectionsThe Trump administration has filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court seeking to reinstate a controversial dismissal of the Office of Special Counsel's leader, Hampton Dellinger. The appeal argues that Dellinger's dismissal was lawful and that a lower court's order temporarily reinstating him was based on procedural grounds.
Read more »
Trump administration wants Supreme Court to permit firing of whistleblower agency headThe Justice Department's filing asks the conservative-majority court to lift a judge's court order temporarily reinstating Hampton Dellinger as the leader of the Office of Special Counsel.
Read more »