The Supreme Court has ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way his tattoos were interpreted.
woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way his tattoos were interpreted.
In a dissent joined by her liberal colleagues, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that denying citizens the right to seek specific reasons about why their spouses are denied entry, “gravely undervalues the right to marriage in the immigration context.” But once there, the consular officer denied his application and cited a law denying entry to people who could participate in unlawful activity.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
The Supreme Court rules against California woman whose husband was denied entry to USThe Supreme Court has ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way his tattoos were interpreted.
Read more »
The Supreme Court rules against California woman whose husband was denied entry to USThe Supreme Court has ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way his tattoos were interpreted.
Read more »
The Supreme Court rules against California woman whose husband was denied entry to USThe Supreme Court has ruled against a California woman who said her rights were violated after federal officials refused to allow her husband into the country, in part, because of the way his tattoos were interpreted.
Read more »
Supreme Court upholds California woman's drug smuggling conviction that leaned on expert's opinionThe Supreme Court on Thursday upheld a California woman's drug smuggling conviction that was based in part on an expert's testimony that criminal gangs rarely use 'blind mules' to move drugs across the southern border.
Read more »
Supreme Court upholds meth conviction of California woman who claimed she was a ‘blind mule’Defense attorneys argued that a Homeland Security agent’s testimony broke a rule of evidence that expert witnesses cannot give opinions on a defendant’s mental state. The court did not agree.
Read more »
UC Berkeley can build student housing at historic People's Park, California Supreme Court rulesUC Berkeley can build student housing at historic People's Park, California Supreme Court rules
Read more »