This article discusses the transfer of wealth in America from younger, less affluent generations (Millennials and Gen Z) to older, wealthier generations, primarily through Social Security and Medicare. It highlights the growing disparity in net worth between these groups and argues that the current system is unsustainable and jeopardizes the social safety net.
For years, pointing out the obvious was considered impolite: America’s biggest, most distortionary transfer of wealth does not flow from elites to the working class. Nor does it show up as corporate welfare.
It flows from the relatively young and poor to the relatively old and wealthy. It’s the defining injustice of our fiscal regime, the largest driver of our government debt and the quiet engine behind the malaise of Millennials and Gen Z. More than a decade ago, Nick Gillespie and I wrote a piece in Reason arguing that Social Security and Medicare had together become the great cause of America’s generational inequity. We noted that senior households were wealthier than ever while young households still working to make ends meet had to prop them up further. We also warned of the threat to a genuine social safety net. Treating every elderly person, no matter how well-off, as a member of a protected class entitled to increasingly unaffordable benefits will eventually destroy a system that progressives in particular cherish. Around that time, “Occupy Wall Street” protesters were railing against “the 1%.” I offered the tongue-in-cheek suggestion that they also consider occupying AARP, the most powerful lobby defending the largest intergenerational wealth grab in American history. As such, I greatly appreciated seeing Russ Greene, managing director of the Prime Mover Institute, join the fight and coin the term “Total Boomer Luxury Communism” in an important article over at the American Mind. The name sounds like a joke, but the math is sound. American heads of households younger than 35 now have a median net worth of about $39,000 and an average net worth of more than $183,000. Those over 75 have a median net worth of roughly $335,000 and an average net worth exceeding $1.6 million. As a group, today’s seniors are the wealthiest we’ve ever had. Many own their homes outright in markets younger families cannot afford to enter. Seniors enjoy higher rates of stock ownership and have benefited enormously from decades of rising asset values. Meanwhile, younger Americans face soaring housing costs, student-loan debt, delayed family formation and a labor market shaped by slower growth and higher federal indebtedness. Some of this reflects natural wealth accumulation over time, and there is nothing wrong with that. But why does the modern welfare state magnify the disparity? As Greene explains, “retired millionaires have become the greatest recipients of government aid,” as Social Security can redistribute up to $60,000 a year to an individual and $117,000 to a household. “Meanwhile,” Greene notes, “Medicare programs are paying for golf balls, greens fees, social club memberships, horseback riding lessons, and pet food.” Younger Americans are also on the hook for about $73 trillion in unfunded obligations projected over the next 75 years, making now the time to act. Some defenders of the status quo argue that higher taxes will fix the problem, but it would again fall on younger earners to continue redistributing benefits to the same affluent seniors, worsening the generational imbalance. The problem is not a lack of revenue; it’s a benefit structure that ignores modern demographics, modern wealth patterns and basic fairness. Paying less to seniors who don’t need the money is the only fair reform to this dilemma. Every time someone points these facts out, defenders respond reflexively: “But seniors paid in. They earned it.”We’ve known for decades that the system is wildly unbalanced. As Andrew Biggs of the American Enterprise Institute points out, a typical average-wage retiree in the 2030s will receive 37% more in Social Security benefits than they paid in taxes. Medicare is even more lopsided: Seniors routinely receive three to five times the amount they contributed. Some older Americans who oppose reducing benefits will respond that we need to preserve the same system for younger generations. I’m sorry, but avoiding destitution in old age does not require a 25-year-old to fund the most regressive wealth transfer scheme in the developed world — especially when certain seniors use it to enjoy 25 years of vacations.Heading into 2026, Democrats are on the brink of success – and self-sabotageOn the legal front, things are not what people think. As the Supreme Court made clear in the 1960 Flemming vs. Nestor case, Congress has a legal right to amend Social Security benefits. The government can change the formula tomorrow. Social insurance programs are compatible with a basic safety net, but what we have now is a slow-motion generational fleecing. Politicians continue to treat seniors as an overwhelmingly fragile and impoverished group in order to oppose reforming the system. Thankfully, Americans across ideological lines are beginning to recognize the structure for what it is: one that requires punishing younger generations through taxes and debt so that their grandparents can receive far more in benefits than they ever contributed or were originally promised. Veronique de Rugy is the George Gibbs Chair in Political Economy and a senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.After housing nearly 300 people, Los Angeles officials to expand San Fernando Valley’s RV-to-Home project citywideSources: Rams fire special teams coordinator Chase BlackburnAlleged killer of ‘American Idol’ exec and husband in Encino to be sent to state hospitalAnalysis: Kings did right to trade Phillip Danault, but issues loom
Generational Wealth Transfer Social Security Medicare Wealth Inequality Government Debt
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Glendale Physician Indicted for Alleged Medicare Fraud Involving Botox InjectionsDr. Violetta Mailyan, a Glendale physician, has been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly defrauding Medicare through false claims for Botox injections. The charges include wire fraud and obstruction of a criminal investigation. The Justice Department alleges the injections were either unnecessary or never provided, with claims filed during times when Mailyan was traveling or patients were incarcerated. If convicted, Mailyan faces significant prison time.
Read more »
Proposed Rule Threatens Medicaid and Medicare Funding for Hospitals Providing Gender-Affirming Care to YouthA proposed rule would cut off Medicaid and Medicare funding for hospitals offering gender-affirming care to transgender individuals under 18. This has sparked strong reactions from medical professionals and advocacy groups, who condemn the ban, citing scientific evidence and concerns about the well-being of vulnerable youth.
Read more »
Critique of Mitt Romney's Social Security and Medicare Reform ProposalsAn analysis of Mitt Romney's proposed reforms to Social Security and Medicare, arguing that the suggested measures, including means-testing and raising the retirement age, are flawed and may be detrimental to the American people. The author contrasts Romney's ideas with a vision for a different approach.
Read more »
Larry Wilson: Trump’s sick take on a National Security StrategySimple surrender to the new czarists.
Read more »
Egypt's el-Sissi urges UN Security Council reform for Africa's roleEgypt’s President Abdel-Fattah el-Sissi has called for changes in the U.N. Security Council to give Africa a bigger role in global decisions. He made the plea at the Russia-Africa partnership conference held in Cairo on Saturday. El-Sissi emphasized Africa's significant human, economic and political influence.
Read more »
NYC municipal retirees betrayed by their own unions on Medicare benefitsWe introduced a state bill to help all municipal retirees from being forced into Medicare Advantage but the AFL-CIO NYS Regional Director, Mario Cilento,
Read more »