This article discusses the implications of a lawsuit filed by Utah seeking control over federal lands within the state. The author argues that the case, though seemingly about land management, is a veiled attempt to privatize public lands for corporate gain. It highlights the importance of public lands for recreation, conservation, and democratic values, emphasizing the need for continued public vigilance and advocacy to protect them from exploitation.
The next four years will be rife with attempts to take public lands out of public hands. I woke up at 7:30 a.m. on Jan. 13 to frantically refresh my internet browser. I was eager to see if the U.S. Supreme Court would dismiss Utah’s land grab lawsuit. On its face, the complaint is benign — Utah is simply asking to manage half of the federally-owned land in the state. But it’s much bigger than that.
The case is a Trojan horse that could ultimately allow Utah — and other Western states — to take public land out of public hands and sell it to corporations and developers. Thankfully, the Supreme Court refused to hear Utah’s complaint. Had the court agreed to take it, it could have spelled the end of life in the West as we know it. Utah will likely continue its legal crusade in the lower courts, wasting millions of dollars of taxpayer money in the process. And the state could also take its campaign to Congress. With a friendly president in the White House, Republicans could pass legislation to transfer federal lands to the states, which could sell them off to corporations, developers and investors. The next four years will be a perilous time for public lands. But numbers are on our side: A 2024 poll by Colorado College found that support conserving public lands over leasing them to companies for profit. Westerners of all walks of life — and across the political spectrum — understand that public lands are a force for equality and democracy. United, we will fight to protect them. To me, public lands are personal. When I moved to southeast Utah in 2019 to be a reporter, I was floored by the concept of public land. I grew up in Texas. My understanding of open land was that someone wealthy owned it — and they could shoot you for trespassing. I was shocked to learn you could drive out of town and camp just about anywhere in southern Utah. What a luxury. To sleep outside in Texas, you need access to a ranch or a reservation at a private or state-owned campground. When the pandemic hit in 2020, I was living in Bluff on the doorstep of Bears Ears National Monument. My job as a reporter, which had once involved driving long distances to attend rural county commission meetings, now consisted of making calls from my kitchen table. After long, depressing days of reporting on COVID deaths, I turned to public lands for solace. I floated down the San Juan River in the summer and scrambled up red rock ridges in the winter. This unfettered access to nature — to hike, bike, climb and camp — was threatened last August, when Utah filed its complaint with the Supreme Court, essentially seeking control of all land under the purview of the Bureau of Land Management in the state. The complaint, on its face, was about who should manage public lands. But after advocating for and reporting on public lands for five years, I knew it was about something much deeper: the very existence of public land. Public lands are some of the most valuable assets in our country, and wealthy individuals and corporations want to get their hands on them. For example, the Federal Housing Authority found that of Utah legislators profit from buying and selling real estate. Combine that with Utah’s ongoing obsession with fossil fuels, and it follows that this lawsuit was always about taking control of public lands in order to sell them to the highest bidder
PUBLIC LANDS UTAH LAWSUIT FEDERAL LANDS WESTERN STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONSERVATION CORPORATE GREED
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
Utah Public Lands Face Challenges in 2025Utah's public lands are facing numerous challenges in 2025, including record visitation, budget constraints, and the need to protect fragile resources. The article discusses how park managers are implementing strategies to manage visitation, such as timed entry systems and permit lotteries, to ensure the long-term sustainability of these treasured areas.
Read more »
Utah Governor Sues to Transfer Millions of Acres of Public LandsUtah Governor Spencer Cox is suing the federal government to transfer control of millions of acres of public lands to the state, raising concerns about the future of public lands in the West.
Read more »
Utah Gov. Cox to Meet with Trump, Discuss Energy, Public Lands and MoreUtah Governor Spencer Cox will meet with President-elect Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago to discuss energy policy, public lands management, and other priorities. Cox plans to advocate for increased energy production, particularly through nuclear power, and address concerns about housing affordability, border security, and inflation.
Read more »
Rally at Capitol protests lawsuit seeking Utah public landsMya Constantino is a multimedia journalist for FOX 13 News.
Read more »
Utah 'able and willing' to challenge public lands decision after Supreme Court denies caseUtah leaders say they remain 'able and willing' to challenge Bureau of Land Management decisions after the U.S. Supreme Court decided to not to take up the state's public lands lawsuit.
Read more »
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to hear Utah’s public lands challengeThe state in August filed a lawsuit asking the court to declare the federal Bureau of Land Management’s ownership of 18.5 million acres of land in Utah unconstitutional.
Read more »