It's been 100 days since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
It follows up similar action from President Biden to safeguard reproductive rights over the summer. He signed anthat aims to help people who must travel out of state to receive abortions, ensures that healthcare providers nationwide are complying with federal law so that care isn’t delayed, and advances research and data collection regarding how the Dobbs v. Jackson ruling is affecting necessary healthcare.
At today’s conference, four physicians presented their experience over the past 100 days. Kristin Lyerly, a general OB-GYN in Green Bay, Wisconsin, discussed how a statute stemming from amakes it a felony to provide abortion care and affects rural communities. She also had a warning for the rest of the country. “Downstream, this affects all of us.
United States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
SCOTUS is back in session – is the next Dobbs on the docket?Last term, the Supreme Court unwound nearly 50 years of reproductive freedom, overturning Roe v. Wade and revoking the bodily autonomy of any American who can become pregnant. The damage of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision continues to play out every day in red states that rushed to ban abortion. But the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority is not likely finished rolling back long-held personal freedoms. The Court is back in session Monday and, over the next few months, will hear oral arguments on a slate of cases concerning voting rights, election law, discrimination, and affirmative action – any one of which could prove as harmful as Dobbs. Ali Velshi is joined by Jeffrey Rosen, president and CEO of the National Constitution Center and Fatima Goss Graves, president and CEO of the National Women’s Law Center to break down the facts of each of these crucial cases and what’s at stake.
Read more »
SCOTUS Hears a Case with Broad Implications for the Clean Water ActAs the new term begins, the Supreme Court debates what wetlands should be protected under one of the EPA’s most successful and controversial efforts
Read more »
Groups Warn SCOTUS May Gut 'Foundational' Digital Rights Law'Section 230 is a foundational and widely misunderstood law that protects human rights and free expression online,' said fightfortheftr director evan_greer after the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider a related case.
Read more »