+34
Columnists Jim Alexander and Mirjam Swanson discuss some of the week’s sports issues.
Lakers Kobe Bryant, from left, Rick Fox, Lindsey Hunter and Shaquille O’Neal celebrate winning Game 4 of the NBA Finals against the New Jersey Nets on June 12, 2002, for their third consecutive NBA championship, a feat no other team in the four major pro sports has equaled.
We are a little more than a week away from the Super Bowl – or, as merchants desperately trying to latch onto arguably this country’s biggest event without running afoul of trademark restrictions will call it, the “Big Game.” And I was reminded this week of another bit of trademark business. The Kansas City Chiefs, as we all know, are going for a third straight title. But if they want to use the term “three-peat” on any official gear, they’d better make their checks and Zelle deposits and the like payable to Pat Riley. Riles trademarked the term after the Lakers’ back-to-back championships in ’87 and ’88 – he acknowledges Byron Scott came up with the term, but he was smart enough to glom onto it. And while Riley’s Lakers didn’t win three in a row, when Phil Jackson’s Chicago Bulls did so twice in the ’90s, Riles indeed got paid, approximately $300,000 in licensing and royalty fees in 1993, according to Finance Monthly,and nearly $600,000 in 1998. And when Jackson’s Lakers won three straight in 2000, ’01 and ’02, Riley profited again. I guess one question, as the Super Bowl hype machine gears up for Chiefs-Eagles next week, is whether the public will root for or against the Chiefs in their quest for a three- … um, third straight championship. I think Dodgers fans might end up sharing a bond with Chiefs supporters, groups who understand the whole hate-us-’cause-they-ain’t-us is real and what it means to be living large and rent-free in everyone’s heads. They took different routes to that destination, of course – the free-spending Dodgers get to splurge, Kansas City has to operate within the confines of the NFL’s supposed parity-inducing guidelines. One of the things they both have in common: great coaches. On the football side, Andy Reid and Patrick Mahomes are the new Bill Belichick and Tom Brady. The Dodgers got Dave Roberts and, well, Shohei and Mookie and Freddie and … yeah. I don’t know if Dodgers fans feel that connection though. They might also be tired of seeing Kansas City get out of each and every jam unscathed, as though the Chiefs are the stars’ of a predictable network procedural. Maybe they will, though, when the Dodgers are, themselves, working on earning more royalties for Riley Wouldn’t that cause heads to explode from coast to coast? Anyway, on to a peculiar NBA matter. Adam Silver went on record on the Dan Patrick radio show as saying he’s in favor of reducing games from 12-minute quarters to 10. I’m still trying to figure out where this came from. “As we get more involved in global basketball, the NBA is the only league that plays 48 minutes. And I would be – I am – a fan of four 10-minute quarters,” Silver said, then adding: “I’m not sure that many others are. Putting aside what it means for records and things like that, yeah, I think that a two-hour format for a game is more consistent with modern television habits.” Honestly, time of game is not the NBA’s problem. In fact, the ESPN story on Silver’s remarks noted that game times this year average 2:16, “nearly identical to the past 15 seasons .” Does he think fewer minutes will reduce the wear and tear on the athletes? Somehow I don’t think that’s where this idea is coming from – I’m guessing it’s more of a marketing concept. But if I’m representing one of the networks that shelled out a combined $76 billion over the next 11 years for rights to NBA games, I would think that extra eight minutes a game, and the resulting commercial time, would be pretty important in terms of defraying those costs.I’ve always thought WNBA games should be longer, because people look at them – they’re 40 minutes – and think the women don’t score much. But they’re playing eight fewer minutes, so … those Aces teams that were scoring 100-plus every game? Imagine what they’d do in 48 minutes.Of all the issues that might be facing the NBA, I hadn’t heard anyone mention length of games. That was baseball’s problem, Adam, not yours. And if it really irks him, then besides shortening the game clock – which would also suppress the market for bench players, you’d think – there are other ways to go about it. How about fewer/shorter reviews, ’cause those are a problem. Or, if you must, take away a timeout. Or shoot, do what the G League has been trying and make free throws in the first 46 minutes a free THROW, singular, but still worth two points. That would help when James Harden and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander – expert foul-bait artists – visit the line 14, 15, 16 times per game … I don’t think of that so much as a time-of-play issue, but an aesthetic one: It’s not as fun to watch players shoot free throws instead of doing anything else on the a basketball court. I also don’t think the game is broken because the volume of 3-point shooting is so high, I think that’s less a problem because the games are often still exciting and entertaining. There are so many compelling athletes and personalities playing every night. At least to me, a basketball fan. So maybe the marketing could improve – and I’m not talking about Chuck and his “Inside the NBA” hosts, whose curmudgeonly banter is delightful, which is why so many other similar shows want to copy it. But the NBA’s reputation as a load-balance-heavy league hasn’t helped it, I don’t think. The fact that ESPN turned transactions into a source of entertainment and intrigue that trumped the games always felt like a problem to me – and has manifested as one now that the league and its players have severely slowed that market with their CBA and all its stringent and punitive rules. Also, yeah, I think they likely did turn off some people in a divided audience when the league took a political stance around 2020, but that was to be expected so I respect it. The basketball, though? The basketball is fun! More fun than in some eras of the past, when it really was iso-driven, or when it was just a low-scoring defensive slugfest. If you’ve been turned off and tuned out for whatever reason, I implore you: Try it, you’ll like it.My suggestion? Eliminate back-to-backs, even if it means reducing the schedule by a few games or so. I know, heresy. But if you want teams and players at their best every game, reducing the schedule from 82 games to 76 makes more sense than playing eight minutes less.We’ve all been talking for weeks about what the Lakers need to do, or need to acquire, to compete for a championship. But what about the Clippers? How close are they to legit championship contention, and is there a deal out there that they can make before next Thursday’s deadline that could make a difference?, I’m wondering if the team they have right now, healthy and with a fully functional Kawhi Leonard, might be enough to make a serious playoff run. It’s always wise to hedge with a statement like that, true, just because of the franchise’s history of bad breaks and untimely injuries. But I like the way this team is playing, I like the balance on the roster, and I am willing to admit that Harden is a better fit on this team. I was dubious when they first got him, and maybe some of that evolution is because of changes on the roster between then and now. This roster just seems more in sync. When they reached the conference finals in 2021 it almost felt like there was a smoke-and-mirrors element to it, especially with Kawhi having just gotten hurt again . This would be a more monumental climb given the beastly nature of the Western Conference.Harden really has it going, Norman Powell and Ivica Zubac are much better than anyone ever gave them credit for – shoot, they both would deserve it if they were added to the All-Star roster this year. Amir Coffey has been crazy efficient. Derrick Jones Jr. and Kris Dunn have been everything Clippers fans could’ve dreamed of. And, oh yeah, it’s Tyronn Lue running the show.But they absolutely would need Kawhi to get really deep into the postseason. And, after his ailing knee sidelined him early in the postseason each of the past two years, I would have to see Kawhi’s body stand up to an intense playoff pounding to believe it. And I want to see it, don’t get me wrong. But I wouldn’t go to FanDuel or whatever and put money on it.That’s not to say they can’t improve this roster. Zubac has been a monster this season, the 7-footer is averaging 15 points and 13 rebounds this season, and he isn’t even keen on taking games off, whether he’s hurt or could use rest. Still, he could use some dependable backup. And the Clippers’ current backup post presences – Mo Bamba and Kai Jones – ain’t it.And like the Lakers, if the Clippers’ stars are healthy I don’t think a real run is out of the question. Will we see it? From either team? Anything is possible with the right matchup and good health and a little bit of magic. But all the same, I’m not holding my breath.LA County wildfires create fierce competition for homes in Newport Beach, South BayLos Angeles Mayor Karen Bass pushes the limits of partisanshipLAPD debunks viral ‘help’ messages written in downtown Los Angeles lotMidair collision kills 67 people in the deadliest US air disaster in almost a quarter centuryIs the air, water safe in LA County after Palisades, Eaton fires? Here’s what you need to know Gabriel Fernandez, 8, was tortured to death. His mother didn’t like her life sentence. This is what a judge had to say. Gabriel Fernandez, 8, was tortured to death. His mother didn’t like her life sentence. This is what a judge had to say.Halted research, disciplined doctors: internal audit finds Kaiser ignored patient protections in Northern California study‘Why him?’ Undocumented father gets swept up, turned over to ICE during operation targeting someone else
Scratch the next story
Please follow us on Google to support usUnited States Latest News, United States Headlines
Similar News: You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.
NBA Postpones Lakers, Clippers Games Amid Southern California WildfiresThe NBA has postponed Saturday's home games for both the Los Angeles Lakers and Los Angeles Clippers due to the wildfires affecting Southern California. The league is prioritizing the safety of its community and fans, and working with local officials to ensure no resources are diverted from wildfire response efforts. Some Lakers and Clippers personnel have been directly impacted by the fires, including Lakers coach JJ Redick, whose family lost belongings in the blaze. The NBA and NBPA have also donated $1 million for immediate relief to organizations supporting those affected by the disaster.
Read more »
NBA postpones Saturday’s Lakers-Spurs, Clippers-Hornets games due to firesThe league made the announcement Friday night, adding that the dates for the rescheduled games will be announced at a later time. The Lakers also had their Thursday game against Charlotte postponed…
Read more »
NBA Makes Big Lakers, Clippers Decision Amid Los Angeles FiresThe NBA has decided to postpone both the LA Clippers and Los Angeles Lakers games
Read more »
NBA postpones Saturday's Lakers-Spurs, Clippers-Hornets games in Southern California due to wildfiresThe NBA announced that Saturday's home games for both the Los Angeles Lakers and Los Angeles Clippers have been postponed as the wildfires sweep through Southern California.
Read more »
Clippers vs. Lakers: Can LA Clippers Extend Home Winning Streak?The Los Angeles Clippers aim to extend their five-game home winning streak as they take on the Los Angeles Lakers. Both teams are strong contenders in the Western Conference, with the Clippers boasting a strong defense and the Lakers excelling in scoring inside the paint. This matchup promises to be a thrilling clash between two LA rivals.
Read more »