The 4 reasons the Pa. Supreme Court picked the winning congressional map

United States News News

The 4 reasons the Pa. Supreme Court picked the winning congressional map
United States Latest News,United States Headlines
  • 📰 PennLive
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 48 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 23%
  • Publisher: 53%

The majority highlighted traditional redistricting criteria and partisan fairness as reasons why the court picked a map submitted by a group of Pennsylvanians from among more than a dozen proposals.

HARRISBURG — In February, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court announced that it had picked a new congressional map for the state — but didn’t explain why.outlining their positions, revealing differing perspectives on the judiciary’s role in redistricting and what exactly makes a fair map.

The majority opinion — written by Chief Justice Max Baer, a Democrat — outlined four reasons why the Carter map was chosen. Those criteria are compactness, contiguity, minimal splits, and equal population. The Carter map fulfilled all of them, but it didn’t score as well on some of these metrics as other maps.

The Carter map intentionally considered incumbency in order to avoid “inadvertently double-bunking sitting congressional representatives in the same district,” Jonathan Rodden, the professor who drew the map, wrote in a report to the court. To account for significant population loss in rural areas and growth in the southeast, two incumbents were paired.

To gauge if any group’s voting power had been diluted, the court considered a number of fairly new metrics including the efficiency gap, which indicates the number of “wasted votes” in each election or the number of votes that don’t contribute to a candidate’s victory.

We have summarized this news so that you can read it quickly. If you are interested in the news, you can read the full text here. Read more:

PennLive /  🏆 463. in US

United States Latest News, United States Headlines

Similar News:You can also read news stories similar to this one that we have collected from other news sources.

Pa. Supreme Court mulls decision after 3 hours of arguments over no-excuse, mail-in votingPa. Supreme Court mulls decision after 3 hours of arguments over no-excuse, mail-in votingAct 77, passed by legislators and signed by Gov. Tom Wolf in late 2019, allowed mail-in voting without requiring a specific excuse five months before the pandemic hit.
Read more »

Divided Pa. Supreme Court Explains Choice of New Congressional MapDivided Pa. Supreme Court Explains Choice of New Congressional MapThe state Supreme Court chose a map last month that had been submitted by a group of Democratic voters. It keeps much of the state's electorate in the same districts, but does alter the map in a way that will realign districts for tens of thousands of voters beginning with the May 17 primary election.
Read more »

Jury favors Pennsylvania man who sued school over First Amendment rights | Today in Pa.Jury favors Pennsylvania man who sued school over First Amendment rights | Today in Pa.Former West Mifflin superintendent to receive nearly $3M in damages. Small business owners take it from gas prices. Pittsburgh school buses consider AI tech. Cow rescued from mud after 12 hours.
Read more »

2 injured during Tuesday shootings in central Pa.2 injured during Tuesday shootings in central Pa.No arrests have been made.
Read more »

David McCormick surges past Mehmet Oz and other takeaways from a new Pa. Senate race pollDavid McCormick surges past Mehmet Oz and other takeaways from a new Pa. Senate race pollMoney in politics is a grubby, ugly business. But a new poll shows that when used effectively, it’s a major factor in any campaign.
Read more »



Render Time: 2025-02-23 15:26:07